Talk:mynedadwy

RFV discussion: February 2018–October 2020

This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.

---

mynedadwy

Moved from WT:RFDN.__Gamren (talk) 08:45, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

This isn't a word. I think it's been autogenerated in the mynd conjugation table and then someone has made it into an entry.Llusiduonbach (talk) 19:47, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

mynededig

Moved from WT:RFDN.__Gamren (talk) 08:45, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

This isn't a word. I think it's been autogenerated in the mynd conjugation table and then someone has made it into an entry. Llusiduonbach (talk) 19:48, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

If you doubt that the word exists, WT:RFVN is the correct place to bring it. —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 20:20, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

• Wait, I see that @Mahagaja created them. Maybe he can resolve it. —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 20:20, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
  • I got them from Kathryn Klingebiel's 234 Welsh Verbs: Standard Literary Forms (→ISBN), but it's true they aren't listed in {{R:cy:GPC}}. BGC shows them both being listed in various 19th-century Welsh grammars and dictionaries, but actual use in running text is quite rare. I did find this for mutated fynedadwy and this for mutated fynededig. Since Welsh is an LDL, I think even those two uses should be sufficient to keep them. —Mahāgaja (formerly Angr) · talk 21:26, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Delete. The forms are not used anymore, apparently. HeliosX (talk) 17:31, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

• I reiterate my "keep" vote for both forms on the basis of the attestations I found back in February 2018. "Not used anymore, apparently" is a reason to apply a label like {{lb|cy|obsolete}} or {{lb|cy|archaic}}, maybe merely {{lb|cy|rare}}, but not a reason to delete. —Mahāgaja · talk 11:48, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

I removed the RFD tags as this is an RFV matter. And as Mahagaja has found citations (linked above, though it would be better if they were moved into the entries), this seems to meet LDL CFI. Strictly speaking, even mentions (mentioned above) would count, if they were from reputable/trustworthy grammars. So, kept. - -sche (discuss) 21:19, 11 October 2020 (UTC)