Jump to content

Peter van Inwagen: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
Alter: url. | You can use this bot yourself. Report bugs here. | Activated by AManWithNoPlan | via #UCB_webform
Personal life: citation, added detail
 
(46 intermediate revisions by 34 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Use mdy dates|date=April 2020}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=April 2020}}
{{short description|American philosopher}}
{{Short description|American philosopher (born 1942)}}
{{Infobox philosopher
{{Infobox philosopher
| name = Peter van Inwagen
| name = Peter van Inwagen
| image =
| image =
| caption =
| caption =
| birth_name =
| birth_name =
Line 13: Line 13:
| school_tradition = [[Analytic philosophy]]
| school_tradition = [[Analytic philosophy]]
| doctoral_advisor = [[Richard Taylor (philosopher)|Richard Taylor]]
| doctoral_advisor = [[Richard Taylor (philosopher)|Richard Taylor]]
| main_interests = [[Metaphysics]]<br>[[Philosophy of religion]]<br>[[Philosophy of action]]
| main_interests = [[Metaphysics]]<br />[[Philosophy of religion]]<br />[[Philosophy of action]]
| notable_ideas = [[Incompatibilism]]<br> [[Consequence argument]]<ref name="Vihvelin">{{cite web |last1=Vihvelin |first1=Kadri |title=Arguments for Incompatibilism |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/incompatibilism-arguments/ |website=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |accessdate=April 13, 2020 |date=September 18, 2017}}</ref><br>[[Meta-ontology]]
| notable_ideas = [[Mereology#Special composition question (SCQ)|Special composition question]]<br/>[[Incompatibilism]]<br /> [[Consequence argument]]<ref name="Vihvelin">{{cite web |last1=Vihvelin |first1=Kadri |title=Arguments for Incompatibilism |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/incompatibilism-arguments/ |website=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=April 13, 2020 |date=September 18, 2017 |archive-date=September 21, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180921003053/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/incompatibilism-arguments/ |url-status=live }}</ref><br />[[Meta-ontology]]<br>Mind argument
| influences = [[Alvin Plantinga]]
| influenced =
}}
}}
'''Peter van Inwagen''' ({{IPAc-en|v|æ|n|_|ɪ|n|ˈ|w|ɑː|g|ən}}; born September 21, 1942) is an American [[analytic philosophy|analytic philosopher]] and the John Cardinal O'Hara Professor of Philosophy at the [[University of Notre Dame]]. He is also a Research Professor of Philosophy at [[Duke University]] each Spring.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://philosophy.duke.edu/people?Gurl=&Uil=17877&subpage=profile |title=Faculty &#124; Department of Philosophy |accessdate=July 2, 2015 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20150305230242/http://philosophy.duke.edu/people?Gurl=&Uil=17877&subpage=profile |archivedate=March 5, 2015 }} </ref> He previously taught at [[Syracuse University]] and earned his PhD from the [[University of Rochester]] in 1969<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.faraday.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk/Biography.php?ID=285 |title=Prof. Peter van Inwagen|work=faraday.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk |accessdate=October 3, 2015 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20151003235800/https://www.faraday.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk/Biography.php?ID=285 |archivedate=October 3, 2015 }} </ref> under the direction of [[Richard Taylor (philosopher)|Richard Taylor]].<ref>{{cite web |first1=Steve |last1=Holmes |url=http://www.giffordlectures.org/lecturers/peter-van-inwagen|title=Peter van Inwagen|website=The Gifford Lectures|accessdate=November 17, 2017|date=August 18, 2014}}</ref> Van Inwagen is one of the leading figures in contemporary [[metaphysics]], [[philosophy of religion]], and [[philosophy of action]]. He was the president of the [[Society of Christian Philosophers]] from 2010 to 2013.<ref name="societyofchristianphilosophers.com">{{cite web |url=http://www.societyofchristianphilosophers.com/?page_id=293 |title=SCP Officers and Committees|publisher=Society of Christian Philosophers |accessdate=October 3, 2015 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120802034346/http://www.societyofchristianphilosophers.com/?page_id=293 |archivedate=August 2, 2012 }} </ref>


'''Peter van Inwagen''' ({{IPAc-en|v|æ|n|_|ɪ|n|ˈ|w|ɑː|g|ən}}; born September 21, 1942) is an [[Americans|American]] [[analytic philosophy|analytic]] [[philosopher]] and the John Cardinal O'Hara Professor of Philosophy at the [[University of Notre Dame]]. He is also a research professor of philosophy at [[Duke University]] each spring.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://philosophy.duke.edu/people?Gurl=&Uil=17877&subpage=profile |title=Faculty &#124; Department of Philosophy |access-date=July 2, 2015 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150305230242/http://philosophy.duke.edu/people?Gurl=&Uil=17877&subpage=profile |archive-date=March 5, 2015}}</ref> He previously taught at [[Syracuse University]], earning his PhD from the [[University of Rochester]] in 1969<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.faraday.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk/Biography.php?ID=285 |title=Prof. Peter van Inwagen |work=faraday.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk |access-date=October 3, 2015 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151003235800/https://www.faraday.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk/Biography.php?ID=285 |archive-date=October 3, 2015}}</ref> under the direction of [[Richard Taylor (philosopher)|Richard Taylor]].<ref>{{cite web |first1=Steve |last1=Holmes |url=http://www.giffordlectures.org/lecturers/peter-van-inwagen |title=Peter van Inwagen |website=The Gifford Lectures |access-date=November 17, 2017 |date=August 18, 2014}}</ref> Van Inwagen is one of the leading figures in contemporary [[metaphysics]], [[philosophy of religion]], and [[philosophy of action]]. He was the president of the [[Society of Christian Philosophers]] from 2010 to 2013.<ref name="societyofchristianphilosophers.com">{{cite web |url=http://www.societyofchristianphilosophers.com/?page_id=293 |title=SCP Officers and Committees |publisher=Society of Christian Philosophers |access-date=October 3, 2015 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120802034346/http://www.societyofchristianphilosophers.com/?page_id=293 |archive-date=August 2, 2012}}</ref>
==Career==
His 1983 monograph ''An Essay on Free Will''{{sfn|van Inwagen|1983}} played an important role in rehabilitating libertarianism with respect to [[free will]] in mainstream [[analytical philosophy]].{{sfn|Kane|2005|p=23}} In the book, Van Inwagen introduces the term [[incompatibilism]] about free will and [[determinism]], to stand in contrast to [[compatibilism]] - the view that free will is compatible with determinism.{{refn|group=note|Indeed, some philosophers suggest free will must be compatible with determinism, otherwise we could not be responsible for our actions.<ref name="HOBART">{{cite journal |last1=HOBART |first1=R. E. |title=I.—Free Will as Involving Determination and Inconceivable Without It |journal=Mind |date=1934 |volume=XLIII |issue=169 |pages=1–27 |doi=10.1093/mind/XLIII.169.1 }}</ref>}}


== Career ==
Van Inwagen's central argument (the ''[[consequence argument]]'') for this view says that "If determinism is true, then our acts are the consequences of the laws of nature and events in the remote past. But it is not up to us what went on before we were born, and neither is it up to us what the laws of nature are. Therefore, the consequences of those things (including our present acts]) are not up to us."<ref>''Essay'', v</ref>
Van Inwagen's 1983 [[monograph]] ''An Essay on Free Will''{{sfn|van Inwagen|1983}} played an important role in rehabilitating [[Libertarianism (metaphysics)|libertarianism]] with respect to [[free will]] in mainstream [[analytical philosophy]].{{sfn|Kane|2005|p=23}} In the book, he introduces the term [[incompatibilism]] about free will and [[determinism]], to stand in contrast to [[compatibilism]]—the view that free will is compatible with determinism.{{refn|group=note|Indeed, some philosophers suggest free will must be compatible with determinism, otherwise we could not be responsible for our actions.<ref name="HOBART">{{cite journal |last1=Hobart|first1=R. E. |title=I. Free Will as Involving Determination and Inconceivable Without It |journal=Mind |year=1934 |volume=XLIII |issue=169 |pages=1–27 |doi=10.1093/mind/XLIII.169.1}}</ref>}}


Van Inwagen's central argument (the ''[[consequence argument]]'') for this view is that "If determinism is true, then our acts are the consequences of the laws of nature and events in the remote past. But it is not up to us what went on before we were born, and neither is it up to us what the laws of nature are. Therefore, the consequences of those things (including our present acts) are not up to us."<ref>''Essay'', v</ref>
Van Inwagen also added what he called the ''[[Mind Argument]]'' (after the philosophical journal ''[[Mind (journal)|Mind]]'' where such arguments often appeared). "The ''Mind'' argument proceeds by identifying indeterminism with chance and by arguing that an act that occurs by chance, if an event that occurs by chance can be called an act, cannot be under the control of its alleged agent and hence cannot have been performed freely. Proponents of [this argument] conclude, therefore, that free will is not only compatible with determinism but entails determinism."<ref>''Essay'', 16</ref>


Van Inwagen also added what he called the ''Mind Argument'' (after the philosophical journal ''[[Mind (journal)|Mind]]'', where such arguments often appeared). "The ''Mind'' argument proceeds by identifying indeterminism with [[Indeterminism#Philosophy|chance]] and by arguing that an act that occurs by chance, if an event that occurs by chance can be called an act, cannot be under the control of its alleged agent and hence cannot have been performed freely. Proponents of [this argument] conclude, therefore, that free will is not only compatible with determinism but entails determinism."<ref>''Essay'', 16</ref>
The ''Consequence Argument'' and the ''Mind Argument'' are the two horns in the classic dilemma and standard argument ''against'' free will.{{fact|date=April 2020}} If determinism is true, our actions are not free. If indeterminism is true, our actions are random and our will can not be [[Moral responsibility|morally responsible]] for them.<ref name="Smart">{{cite journal |last1=Smart |first1=J. J. C. |title=Free-Will, Praise and Blame |journal=Mind |date=1961 |volume=70 |issue=279 |pages=291–306 |doi=10.1093/mind/LXX.279.291 |jstor=2251619 |issn=0026-4423}}</ref>


The ''Consequence Argument'' and the ''Mind Argument'' are the two horns in the classic dilemma and standard argument ''against'' free will.{{fact|date=April 2020}} If determinism is true, our actions are not free. If indeterminism is true, our actions are influenced by randomness and our [[Will (philosophy)|will]] cannot be [[Moral responsibility|morally responsible]] for them.<ref name="Smart">{{cite journal |last1=Smart |first1=J. J. C. |title=Free-Will, Praise and Blame |journal=Mind |year=1961 |volume=70 |issue=279 |pages=291–306 |doi=10.1093/mind/LXX.279.291 |jstor=2251619 |issn=0026-4423}}</ref>
Van Inwagen concludes that "Free Will Remains a Mystery."{{sfn|van Inwagen|2000|p=14}} In an article written in the third person called "Van Inwagen on Free Will,"{{sfn|van Inwagen|2004|loc=Chapter 10}} he describes the problem with his incompatibilist free will if random ''chance directly causes our actions''.<ref>{{cite web |title=Chance NOT the Direct Cause of Human Action |url=http://www.informationphilosopher.com/freedom/chance_direct_cause.html |website=Information Philosopher |accessdate=April 13, 2020}}</ref> He imagines that God causes the universe to revert a thousand times to ''exactly the same circumstances''<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.informationphilosopher.com/freedom/same_circumstances.html|title=Exactly The Same Circumstances|website=Informationphilosopher.com|accessdate=November 17, 2017}}</ref> that it was in at some earlier time and we could observe all the "replays." If the agent's actions are random, she sometimes "would have agent-caused the crucial brain event and sometimes (in seventy percent of the replays, let us say) she would not have... I conclude that even if an episode of agent causation is among the causal antecedents of every voluntary human action, these episodes do nothing to undermine the prima facie impossibility of an undetermined free act."{{sfn|van Inwagen|2017|p=227}}


Van Inwagen concludes that "Free Will Remains a Mystery."{{sfn|van Inwagen|2000|p=14}} In an article written in the third person called "Van Inwagen on Free Will,"{{sfn|van Inwagen|2004|loc=Chapter 10}} he describes the problem with his incompatibilist free will if random ''chance directly causes our actions''.<ref>{{cite web |title=Chance NOT the Direct Cause of Human Action |url=http://www.informationphilosopher.com/freedom/chance_direct_cause.html |website=Information Philosopher |access-date=April 13, 2020 |archive-date=April 20, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200420110136/http://www.informationphilosopher.com/freedom/chance_direct_cause.html |url-status=live }}</ref> He imagines the universe reverting a thousand times to ''exactly the same circumstances''<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.informationphilosopher.com/freedom/same_circumstances.html |title=Exactly The Same Circumstances |website=Informationphilosopher.com |access-date=November 17, 2017 |archive-date=November 22, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171122185655/http://www.informationphilosopher.com/freedom/same_circumstances.html |url-status=live }}</ref> it was in at some earlier time and observing all the "replays." If the agent's actions are random, she sometimes "would have agent-caused the crucial brain event and sometimes (in seventy percent of the replays, let us say) she would not have... I conclude that even if an episode of agent causation is among the causal antecedents of every voluntary human action, these episodes do nothing to undermine the prima facie impossibility of an undetermined free act."{{sfn|van Inwagen|2017|p=227}}
In a paper submitted to ''[[The Journal of Ethics]]'' entitled "How to Think about the Problem of Free Will," Van Inwagen worries that the concept "free will" may be incoherent. He says "There are seemingly unanswerable arguments that (if they are indeed unanswerable) demonstrate that free will is incompatible with determinism. And there are seemingly unanswerable arguments that ... demonstrate that free will is incompatible with indeterminism. But if free will is incompatible both with determinism and indeterminism, the concept 'free will' is incoherent, and the thing free will does not exist."<ref name=Inwagen>{{cite journal |title=How to think about the problem of free will |author=Peter van Inwagen |year=2008 |journal=The Journal of Ethics |volume=12 |issue=3–4 |pages=327–341 |doi=10.1007/s10892-008-9038-7 |url=http://www.andrewmbailey.com/pvi/How_to_Think_About_Free_Will.pdf}}</ref>


In his book ''Material Beings'',<ref>(Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1995)</ref> Van Inwagen argues that all material objects are either elementary particles or living organisms. Every composite material object is made up of elementary particles, and the only such composite objects are living organisms. A consequence of this view is that everyday objects such as tables, chairs, cars, buildings, and clouds do not exist. While there seem to be such things, this is only because there are elementary particles arranged in specific ways. For example, where it seems that there is a chair, Van Inwagen says that there are only ''elementary particles arranged chairwise.'' These particles do not compose an object, any more than a swarm of bees composes an object. Like a swarm of bees, the particles we call a chair maintain a more or less stable arrangement for a while, which gives the impression of a single object. An individual bee, by contrast, has parts that are unified in the right way to constitute a single object (namely, a bee).
In his book ''Material Beings'',<ref>Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1995</ref> Van Inwagen argues that all material objects are either elementary particles or living organisms. Every composite material object is made up of elementary particles, and the only such composite objects are living organisms. A consequence of this view is that everyday objects such as tables, chairs, cars, buildings, and clouds do not exist. While there seem to be such things, this is only because there are elementary particles arranged in specific ways. For example, where it seems that there is a chair, Van Inwagen says that there are only ''elementary particles arranged chairwise.'' These particles do not compose an object, any more than a swarm of bees composes an object. Like a swarm of bees, the particles we call a chair maintain a more or less stable arrangement for a while, which gives the impression of a single object. An individual bee, by contrast, has parts that are unified in the right way to constitute a single object (namely, a bee).


Van Inwagen gave the 2003 [[Gifford Lectures]]; the lectures are published in his ''The Problem of Evil''.<ref>(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006)</ref> There Van Inwagen argues that the [[Problem of evil]] is a philosophical argument and, like most philosophical arguments, it fails.
Van Inwagen gave the 2003 [[Gifford Lectures]]; they are published in his ''The Problem of Evil''.<ref>Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006</ref> There Van Inwagen argues that the [[problem of evil]] is a philosophical argument and, like most philosophical arguments, fails.


In recent years, Van Inwagen has shown an interest in the afterlife debate, particularly in relation to resurrection of the body. In his unpublished article, "I Look for the Resurrection of the Dead and the Life of the World to Come," Van Inwagen concludes that Christians must account for some sort of physical continuity in their account of existence of the same person after death. In particular, Van Inwagen notes, this is a problem for the Christian materialist, one who believes that human beings are physical substances.
Van Inwagen has shown an interest in the [[afterlife]] debate, particularly in relation to [[Resurrection|resurrection of the body]]. In his article "I Look for the Resurrection of the Dead and the Life of the World to Come", he concludes that Christians must account for some sort of physical continuity in their account of existence of the same person after death. In particular, Van Inwagen notes, this is a problem for the [[Christian materialism|Christian materialist]], one who believes that human beings are physical substances.


==Awards and honors==
== Awards and honors ==
He was elected to the [[American Academy of Arts and Sciences]] in 2005,<ref name="Dame">{{cite web |last1=Dame |first1=Marketing Communications: Web // University of Notre |title=Philosopher elected to American Academy of Arts and Sciences |url=https://news.nd.edu/news/philosopher-elected-to-american-academy-of-arts-and-sciences/ |website=Notre Dame News |accessdate=April 13, 2020 |language=en}}</ref> and was President of the Central Division of the [[American Philosophical Association]] in 2008/09. He was the President of the [[Society of Christian Philosophers]] from 2010 to 2013.<ref name="societyofchristianphilosophers.com"/>
He was elected to the [[American Academy of Arts and Sciences]] in 2005,<ref name="Dame">{{cite web |last1=Dame |first1=Marketing Communications: Web // University of Notre |title=Philosopher elected to American Academy of Arts and Sciences |url=https://news.nd.edu/news/philosopher-elected-to-american-academy-of-arts-and-sciences/ |website=Notre Dame News |date=April 26, 2005 |access-date=April 13, 2020 |language=en |archive-date=April 13, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200413024251/https://news.nd.edu/news/philosopher-elected-to-american-academy-of-arts-and-sciences/ |url-status=live }}</ref> and was President of the Central Division of the [[American Philosophical Association]] in 2008/09. He was the President of the [[Society of Christian Philosophers]] from 2010 to 2013.<ref name="societyofchristianphilosophers.com" />


He has delivered lectures including:
He has delivered lectures including:
Line 50: Line 47:
* The Münster Lectures in Philosophy, including a student colloquium at the University of Münster, November 2015
* The Münster Lectures in Philosophy, including a student colloquium at the University of Münster, November 2015


In May 2011 it was announced that he is to receive an [[honorary doctorate]] from the [[University of St Andrews]], [[Scotland]].<ref name="Cook">{{cite web |last1=Cook |first1=Gayle |title=St Andrews to honour David Attenborough |url=https://news.st-andrews.ac.uk/archive/st-andrews-to-honour-david-attenborough |website=St Andrews |accessdate=April 13, 2020 |date=May 20, 2011}}</ref>
In May 2011 it was announced that he is to receive an [[honorary doctorate]] from the [[University of St Andrews]], [[Scotland]].<ref name="Cook">{{cite web |last1=Cook |first1=Gayle |title=St Andrews to honour David Attenborough |url=https://news.st-andrews.ac.uk/archive/st-andrews-to-honour-david-attenborough |website=St Andrews |access-date=April 13, 2020 |date=May 20, 2011 |archive-date=April 13, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200413015934/https://news.st-andrews.ac.uk/archive/st-andrews-to-honour-david-attenborough |url-status=live }}</ref>


==Books==
== Books ==
* {{cite book |title=Thinking about Free Will |year=2017 |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] |location=Cambridge |isbn=978-1-107-16650-9 |url=}}
* {{cite book |title=Thinking about Free Will |year=2017 |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] |location=Cambridge |isbn=978-1-107-16650-9 }}
* {{cite book |title=Existence: Essays in Ontology |year=2014 |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] |location=Cambridge |isbn=978-1-1076-2526-6 |url=}}
* {{cite book |title=Existence: Essays in Ontology |year=2014 |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] |location=Cambridge |isbn=978-1-107-62526-6 }}
* {{cite book |title=The Problem of Evil |year=2006 |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |location=Oxford |isbn=978-0-19-924560-4 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iQhUrE8BYFIC}}
* {{cite book |title=The Problem of Evil |year=2006 |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |location=Oxford |isbn=978-0-19-924560-4 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iQhUrE8BYFIC}}
* {{cite book |title=Ontology, Identity, and Modality: Essays in Metaphysics |year=2002 |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] |location=Cambridge |isbn= 978-0-521-79164-9 }}
* {{cite book |title=Ontology, Identity, and Modality: Essays in Metaphysics |year=2002 |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] |location=Cambridge |isbn=978-0-521-79164-9}}
* {{cite book |title=The Possibility of Resurrection and Other Essays in Christian Apologetics |year=1998 |publisher=[[Westview Press]] |location=Boulder, CO |isbn= 978-0-8133-2731-0 }}
* {{cite book |title=The Possibility of Resurrection and Other Essays in Christian Apologetics |year=1998 |publisher=[[Westview Press]] |location=Boulder, CO |isbn=978-0-8133-2731-0}}
* {{cite book |title=God, Knowledge and Mystery: Essays in Philosophical Theology |year=1995 |publisher=[[Cornell University Press]] |location=Ithaca |isbn= 978-0-8014-8186-4 }}
* {{cite book |title=God, Knowledge and Mystery: Essays in Philosophical Theology |year=1995 |publisher=[[Cornell University Press]] |location=Ithaca |isbn=978-0-8014-8186-4}}
* {{cite book |title=Metaphysics |year=2002 |publisher=Westview Press |location=Boulder, CO |isbn= 978-0-8133-9055-0 }}
* {{cite book |title=Metaphysics |year=2002 |publisher=Westview Press |location=Boulder, CO |isbn=978-0-8133-9055-0}}
* {{cite book |title=Material Beings |url=https://archive.org/details/materialbeings00vani |url-access=registration |year=1990 |publisher=Cornell University Press |location=Ithaca |isbn= 978-0-8014-8306-6 }}
* {{cite book |title=Material Beings |url=https://archive.org/details/materialbeings00vani |url-access=registration |year=1990 |publisher=Cornell University Press |location=Ithaca |isbn=978-0-8014-8306-6}}
* {{cite book |title=An Essay on Free Will |year=1983 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford |isbn= 978-0-19-824924-5}}
* {{cite book |title=An Essay on Free Will |year=1983 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford |isbn=978-0-19-824924-5}}


==Personal life==
== Personal life ==
Van Inwagen lives in [[Granger, Indiana|Granger]], Indiana, with his wife Elisabeth. Van Inwagen converted to [[Christianity]] in 1980.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Kim |first=Jaekwon |url=https://www.google.al/books/edition/A_Companion_to_Metaphysics/lQ2xDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22van+inwagen%22+%22christianity%22+%221980%22&pg=PA619&printsec=frontcover |title=A Companion to Metaphysics |last2=Sosa |first2=Ernest |last3=Rosenkrantz |first3=Gary S. |date=2009-04-13 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |isbn=978-1-4051-5298-3 |pages=619 |language=en}}</ref> In May 1983, he was [[Baptism|baptized]] and received his [[First Communion]].<ref>{{Cite web |date=1987-04-17 |title=Suddenly, Respect |url=https://www.christianitytoday.com/1987/04/current-religious-thought-suddenly-respect/ |access-date=2024-10-18 |website=[[Christianity Today]] |language=en-US}}</ref>
Van Inwagen lives in [[Granger, Indiana|Granger]], Indiana, with his wife Elisabeth. Van Inwagen converted to [[Christianity]] in 1980.{{fact|date=April 2020}}


==See also==
== See also ==
*[[Mereological nihilism]]
* [[American philosophy]]
*[[American philosophy]]
* [[List of American philosophers]]
* [[Mereological nihilism]]
*[[List of American philosophers]]


==Notes==
== Notes ==
{{reflist|group=note}}
{{reflist|group=note}}


==References==
== References ==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}


==Works cited==
== Works cited ==
* {{cite book |last1=Kane |first1=Robert |title=A Contemporary Introduction to Free Will |date=2005 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-514970-8 |url=https://www.google.com/books/edition/A_Contemporary_Introduction_to_Free_Will/9BRiQgAACAAJ?hl=en |accessdate=April 13, 2020 |ref=harv}}
* {{cite book |last1=Kane |first1=Robert |title=A Contemporary Introduction to Free Will |date=2005 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-514970-8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9BRiQgAACAAJ |access-date=April 13, 2020 }}
* {{cite book |first1=Peter |last1=van Inwagen |title=An Essay on Free Will |year=1983 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford |isbn= 978-0-19-824924-5 |ref=harv}}
* {{cite book |first1=Peter |last1=van Inwagen |title=An Essay on Free Will |year=1983 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford |isbn=978-0-19-824924-5 }}
* {{cite journal |last1=van Inwagen |first1=Peter |title=Free Will Remains a Mystery: The Eighth Philosophical Perspectives Lecture Free Will Remains a Mystery: The Eighth Philosophical Perspectives Lecture |journal=Philosophical Perspectives |date=2000 |volume=14 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/i326123 |accessdate=April 13, 2020 |publisher=Ridgeview Publishing Company |ref=harv}}
* {{cite journal |last1=van Inwagen |first1=Peter |title=Free Will Remains a Mystery: The Eighth Philosophical Perspectives Lecture Free Will Remains a Mystery: The Eighth Philosophical Perspectives Lecture |journal=Philosophical Perspectives |year=2000 |volume=14 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/i326123 |access-date=April 13, 2020 |publisher=Ridgeview Publishing Company }}
* {{cite book |last1=van Inwagen |first1=Peter |editor1-last=Campbell |editor1-first=Joseph Keim |editor2-last=O'Rourke |editor2-first=Michael |editor3-last=Shier |editor3-first=David |title=Freedom and Determinism |date=2004 |publisher=MIT Press |isbn=978-0-262-53257-0 |pages=213–230 |url=https://www.google.com/books/edition/Freedom_and_Determinism/zydkUGosAJcC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=Freedom%20and%20Determinism%2C%20ed.%20Joseph%20Keim%20Campbell&pg=PA213&printsec=frontcover |accessdate=April 13, 2020 |ref=harv}}
* {{cite book |last1=van Inwagen |first1=Peter |editor1-last=Campbell |editor1-first=Joseph Keim |editor2-last=O'Rourke |editor2-first=Michael |editor3-last=Shier |editor3-first=David |title=Freedom and Determinism |date=2004 |publisher=MIT Press |isbn=978-0-262-53257-0 |pages=213–230 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zydkUGosAJcC&dq=Freedom%20and%20Determinism%2C%20ed.%20Joseph%20Keim%20Campbell&pg=PA213 |access-date=April 13, 2020 }}
* {{cite book |last1=van Inwagen |first1=Peter |title=Thinking about Free Will |date=2017 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-107-16650-9 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=49ocDgAAQBAJ&dq=I+conclude+that+even+if+an+episode+of+agent+causation+is+among+the+causal+antecedents+of+every+voluntary+human+action,+these+episodes+do+nothing+to+undermine+the+prima+facie+impossibility+of+an+undetermined+free+act |accessdate=April 13, 2020 |ref=harv}}
* {{cite book |last1=van Inwagen |first1=Peter |title=Thinking about Free Will |date=2017 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-107-16650-9 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=49ocDgAAQBAJ&q=I+conclude+that+even+if+an+episode+of+agent+causation+is+among+the+causal+antecedents+of+every+voluntary+human+action,+these+episodes+do+nothing+to+undermine+the+prima+facie+impossibility+of+an+undetermined+free+act |access-date=April 13, 2020 }}


==Sources==
== Sources ==
* {{cite book |last1=Zimmerman |first1=Dean |editor1-last=Sosa |editor1-first=Ernest |editor2-last=Rosenkrantz |editor2-first=Gary |editor3-last=Kim |editor3-first=Jaegwon |editor1-link=Ernest Sosa |editor2-link=Gary Rosenkrantz |editor3-link=Jaegwon Kim |title=A Companion to Metaphysics |date=2009 |publisher=Blackwell |location=Malden, Massachusetts |pages=619–621 |edition=2nd}}
* {{cite book |last1=Zimmerman |first1=Dean |editor1-last=Sosa |editor1-first=Ernest |editor2-last=Rosenkrantz |editor2-first=Gary |editor3-last=Kim |editor3-first=Jaegwon |editor1-link=Ernest Sosa |editor2-link=Gary Rosenkrantz |editor3-link=Jaegwon Kim |title=A Companion to Metaphysics |date=2009 |publisher=Blackwell |location=Malden, Massachusetts |pages=619–621 |edition=2nd}}


==External links==
== External links ==
* [http://philosophy.nd.edu/people/faculty/peter-van-inwagen/ Official Page] at the University of Notre Dame
* [http://philosophy.nd.edu/people/faculty/peter-van-inwagen/ Official Page] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131017202936/http://philosophy.nd.edu/people/faculty/peter-van-inwagen/ |date=October 17, 2013 }} at the University of Notre Dame
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20080417014630/http://www.giffordlectures.org/Browse.asp?PubID=TPTPOE&Cover=TRUE ''The Problem of Evil''], Oxford University Press, 2006. (Gifford Lectures 2002)
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20080417014630/http://www.giffordlectures.org/Browse.asp?PubID=TPTPOE&Cover=TRUE ''The Problem of Evil''], Oxford University Press, 2006. (Gifford Lectures 2002)
* [http://andrewmbailey.com/pvi/ Papers] by van Inwagen
* [http://andrewmbailey.com/pvi/ Papers] by van Inwagen
* [http://www.informationphilosopher.com/solutions/philosophers/vaninwagen Van Inwagen] (Brief professional overview)
* [http://www.informationphilosopher.com/solutions/philosophers/vaninwagen Van Inwagen] (Brief professional overview)
Line 95: Line 92:
* [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/metaphysics/ "Metaphysics"] (Entry in the [[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy]])
* [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/metaphysics/ "Metaphysics"] (Entry in the [[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy]])
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20100708171604/http://www.closertotruth.com/participant/Peter-van-Inwagen/114 Interviews] from the PBS program [[Closer to Truth]]
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20100708171604/http://www.closertotruth.com/participant/Peter-van-Inwagen/114 Interviews] from the PBS program [[Closer to Truth]]
* {{worldcat id|lccn-n79-151632}}


{{Analytic philosophy}}
{{Analytic philosophy}}
Line 102: Line 98:
{{Authority control}}
{{Authority control}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Inwagen, Peter Van}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Inwagen, Peter Van}}

[[Category:1942 births]]
[[Category:1942 births]]
[[Category:20th-century American essayists]]
[[Category:20th-century American male writers]]
[[Category:20th-century American philosophers]]
[[Category:20th-century American theologians]]
[[Category:21st-century American essayists]]
[[Category:21st-century American male writers]]
[[Category:21st-century American philosophers]]
[[Category:Action theorists]]
[[Category:American Episcopalians]]
[[Category:American Episcopalians]]
[[Category:American male essayists]]
[[Category:American male non-fiction writers]]
[[Category:American philosophy academics]]
[[Category:Analytic philosophers]]
[[Category:Analytic philosophers]]
[[Category:Action theorists]]
[[Category:Analytic theologians]]
[[Category:Anglican philosophers]]
[[Category:Anglican philosophers]]
[[Category:Christian philosophers]]
[[Category:Duke University faculty]]
[[Category:Living people]]
[[Category:Living people]]
[[Category:Ontologists]]
[[Category:American metaphysicians]]
[[Category:Philosophers of religion]]
[[Category:Metaphysics writers]]
[[Category:People from Granger, Indiana]]
[[Category:American philosophers of mind]]
[[Category:American philosophers of religion]]
[[Category:American philosophers of science]]
[[Category:Presidents of the American Philosophical Association]]
[[Category:Presidents of the Society of Christian Philosophers]]
[[Category:Syracuse University faculty]]
[[Category:Syracuse University faculty]]
[[Category:University of Notre Dame faculty]]
[[Category:University of Notre Dame faculty]]
[[Category:University of Rochester alumni]]
[[Category:University of Rochester alumni]]
[[Category:21st-century American philosophers]]
[[Category:Writers about religion and science]]
[[Category:20th-century American philosophers]]
[[Category:American people of Dutch descent]]
[[Category:Metaphysicians]]
[[Category:Moral philosophers]]
[[Category:20th-century theologians]]
[[Category:21st-century theologians]]
[[Category:People from Granger, Indiana]]
[[Category:Duke University faculty]]
[[Category:Critics of atheism]]
[[Category:Presidents of the American Philosophical Association]]

Latest revision as of 17:35, 18 October 2024

Peter van Inwagen
Born (1942-09-21) September 21, 1942 (age 82)
Alma mater
Era20th-/21st-century philosophy
RegionWestern philosophy
SchoolAnalytic philosophy
Doctoral advisorRichard Taylor
Main interests
Metaphysics
Philosophy of religion
Philosophy of action
Notable ideas
Special composition question
Incompatibilism
Consequence argument[1]
Meta-ontology
Mind argument

Peter van Inwagen (/væn ɪnˈwɑːɡən/; born September 21, 1942) is an American analytic philosopher and the John Cardinal O'Hara Professor of Philosophy at the University of Notre Dame. He is also a research professor of philosophy at Duke University each spring.[2] He previously taught at Syracuse University, earning his PhD from the University of Rochester in 1969[3] under the direction of Richard Taylor.[4] Van Inwagen is one of the leading figures in contemporary metaphysics, philosophy of religion, and philosophy of action. He was the president of the Society of Christian Philosophers from 2010 to 2013.[5]

Career

[edit]

Van Inwagen's 1983 monograph An Essay on Free Will[6] played an important role in rehabilitating libertarianism with respect to free will in mainstream analytical philosophy.[7] In the book, he introduces the term incompatibilism about free will and determinism, to stand in contrast to compatibilism—the view that free will is compatible with determinism.[note 1]

Van Inwagen's central argument (the consequence argument) for this view is that "If determinism is true, then our acts are the consequences of the laws of nature and events in the remote past. But it is not up to us what went on before we were born, and neither is it up to us what the laws of nature are. Therefore, the consequences of those things (including our present acts) are not up to us."[9]

Van Inwagen also added what he called the Mind Argument (after the philosophical journal Mind, where such arguments often appeared). "The Mind argument proceeds by identifying indeterminism with chance and by arguing that an act that occurs by chance, if an event that occurs by chance can be called an act, cannot be under the control of its alleged agent and hence cannot have been performed freely. Proponents of [this argument] conclude, therefore, that free will is not only compatible with determinism but entails determinism."[10]

The Consequence Argument and the Mind Argument are the two horns in the classic dilemma and standard argument against free will.[citation needed] If determinism is true, our actions are not free. If indeterminism is true, our actions are influenced by randomness and our will cannot be morally responsible for them.[11]

Van Inwagen concludes that "Free Will Remains a Mystery."[12] In an article written in the third person called "Van Inwagen on Free Will,"[13] he describes the problem with his incompatibilist free will if random chance directly causes our actions.[14] He imagines the universe reverting a thousand times to exactly the same circumstances[15] it was in at some earlier time and observing all the "replays." If the agent's actions are random, she sometimes "would have agent-caused the crucial brain event and sometimes (in seventy percent of the replays, let us say) she would not have... I conclude that even if an episode of agent causation is among the causal antecedents of every voluntary human action, these episodes do nothing to undermine the prima facie impossibility of an undetermined free act."[16]

In his book Material Beings,[17] Van Inwagen argues that all material objects are either elementary particles or living organisms. Every composite material object is made up of elementary particles, and the only such composite objects are living organisms. A consequence of this view is that everyday objects such as tables, chairs, cars, buildings, and clouds do not exist. While there seem to be such things, this is only because there are elementary particles arranged in specific ways. For example, where it seems that there is a chair, Van Inwagen says that there are only elementary particles arranged chairwise. These particles do not compose an object, any more than a swarm of bees composes an object. Like a swarm of bees, the particles we call a chair maintain a more or less stable arrangement for a while, which gives the impression of a single object. An individual bee, by contrast, has parts that are unified in the right way to constitute a single object (namely, a bee).

Van Inwagen gave the 2003 Gifford Lectures; they are published in his The Problem of Evil.[18] There Van Inwagen argues that the problem of evil is a philosophical argument and, like most philosophical arguments, fails.

Van Inwagen has shown an interest in the afterlife debate, particularly in relation to resurrection of the body. In his article "I Look for the Resurrection of the Dead and the Life of the World to Come", he concludes that Christians must account for some sort of physical continuity in their account of existence of the same person after death. In particular, Van Inwagen notes, this is a problem for the Christian materialist, one who believes that human beings are physical substances.

Awards and honors

[edit]

He was elected to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2005,[19] and was President of the Central Division of the American Philosophical Association in 2008/09. He was the President of the Society of Christian Philosophers from 2010 to 2013.[5]

He has delivered lectures including:

  • The F.D. Maurice Lectures, three lectures delivered at the University of London in March 1999
  • The Wilde Lectures on Natural Religion, eight lectures delivered at Oxford University in Trinity Term, 2000
  • The Stewart Lectures: three lectures delivered at Princeton University, October 2002
  • The Gifford Lectures, eight lectures delivered at the University of St. Andrews, May 2003
  • The Jellema Lectures: two lectures delivered at Calvin College, March 2004
  • The Münster Lectures in Philosophy, including a student colloquium at the University of Münster, November 2015

In May 2011 it was announced that he is to receive an honorary doctorate from the University of St Andrews, Scotland.[20]

Books

[edit]
  • Thinking about Free Will. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2017. ISBN 978-1-107-16650-9.
  • Existence: Essays in Ontology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2014. ISBN 978-1-107-62526-6.
  • The Problem of Evil. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2006. ISBN 978-0-19-924560-4.
  • Ontology, Identity, and Modality: Essays in Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2002. ISBN 978-0-521-79164-9.
  • The Possibility of Resurrection and Other Essays in Christian Apologetics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. 1998. ISBN 978-0-8133-2731-0.
  • God, Knowledge and Mystery: Essays in Philosophical Theology. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 1995. ISBN 978-0-8014-8186-4.
  • Metaphysics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. 2002. ISBN 978-0-8133-9055-0.
  • Material Beings. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 1990. ISBN 978-0-8014-8306-6.
  • An Essay on Free Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1983. ISBN 978-0-19-824924-5.

Personal life

[edit]

Van Inwagen lives in Granger, Indiana, with his wife Elisabeth. Van Inwagen converted to Christianity in 1980.[21] In May 1983, he was baptized and received his First Communion.[22]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ Indeed, some philosophers suggest free will must be compatible with determinism, otherwise we could not be responsible for our actions.[8]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Vihvelin, Kadri (September 18, 2017). "Arguments for Incompatibilism". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Archived from the original on September 21, 2018. Retrieved April 13, 2020.
  2. ^ "Faculty | Department of Philosophy". Archived from the original on March 5, 2015. Retrieved July 2, 2015.
  3. ^ "Prof. Peter van Inwagen". faraday.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk. Archived from the original on October 3, 2015. Retrieved October 3, 2015.
  4. ^ Holmes, Steve (August 18, 2014). "Peter van Inwagen". The Gifford Lectures. Retrieved November 17, 2017.
  5. ^ a b "SCP Officers and Committees". Society of Christian Philosophers. Archived from the original on August 2, 2012. Retrieved October 3, 2015.
  6. ^ van Inwagen 1983.
  7. ^ Kane 2005, p. 23.
  8. ^ Hobart, R. E. (1934). "I. Free Will as Involving Determination and Inconceivable Without It". Mind. XLIII (169): 1–27. doi:10.1093/mind/XLIII.169.1.
  9. ^ Essay, v
  10. ^ Essay, 16
  11. ^ Smart, J. J. C. (1961). "Free-Will, Praise and Blame". Mind. 70 (279): 291–306. doi:10.1093/mind/LXX.279.291. ISSN 0026-4423. JSTOR 2251619.
  12. ^ van Inwagen 2000, p. 14.
  13. ^ van Inwagen 2004, Chapter 10.
  14. ^ "Chance NOT the Direct Cause of Human Action". Information Philosopher. Archived from the original on April 20, 2020. Retrieved April 13, 2020.
  15. ^ "Exactly The Same Circumstances". Informationphilosopher.com. Archived from the original on November 22, 2017. Retrieved November 17, 2017.
  16. ^ van Inwagen 2017, p. 227.
  17. ^ Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1995
  18. ^ Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006
  19. ^ Dame, Marketing Communications: Web // University of Notre (April 26, 2005). "Philosopher elected to American Academy of Arts and Sciences". Notre Dame News. Archived from the original on April 13, 2020. Retrieved April 13, 2020.
  20. ^ Cook, Gayle (May 20, 2011). "St Andrews to honour David Attenborough". St Andrews. Archived from the original on April 13, 2020. Retrieved April 13, 2020.
  21. ^ Kim, Jaekwon; Sosa, Ernest; Rosenkrantz, Gary S. (April 13, 2009). A Companion to Metaphysics. John Wiley & Sons. p. 619. ISBN 978-1-4051-5298-3.
  22. ^ "Suddenly, Respect". Christianity Today. April 17, 1987. Retrieved October 18, 2024.

Works cited

[edit]

Sources

[edit]
[edit]