Jump to content

Talk:Explosive belt

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.


Untitled discussion

The article looks good, though naturally there are always places for improvement. I see a few things that could use some expanding--they're good right now, but with more information they would be great: 1. More info on the use of anticoagulants or other unusual items in suicide vests. This is the first I've ever heard of that. 2. More info on security responses to suicide bombers. 3. Clarify how common these vests are. Do most, or even many suicide bombers wear them?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.178.101.32 (talk • contribs) 21:57, 6 June 2006


"Today such devices are used mainly by Palestinian groups, such as Hamas and Islamic Jihad, against civilians in Israel and military personnel in the Palestinian Territories [citation needed]" - from Wikipedia, the well-sourced encyclopedia

83.209.10.168 (talk) 22:28, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Where do they get their explosives

Please add this info. -- 77.7.129.249 (talk) 12:52, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Muslims are by far the most prolific users of this device

The article fails to mention the words Muslim or Islam, why do you censor the fact that these devises are used almost exclusively by Muslims? Please answer the question posted without dening the facts 88.109.12.205 (talk) 22:53, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I believe other agencies throughout history have combined explosives with the will to die.
  • The Viet Cong used explosive vests, usually satchel charges strapped to their chests. This is portrayed in the 1986 movie Platoon.
  • European Petards sometimes died with their explosive charges.
But, if you have a reliable source with statistics or observations that are not in the article, feel free to edit. Boneyard90 (talk) 22:12, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. While explosive vests have been used by many groups in modern history, their frequent and devestating use in the Middle-east is particularly significant, and the article's failure to address that with even an oblique reference seems to be an application of political correctness. If not, the it's just a very incomplete and poor article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.250.115.92 (talk) 01:04, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also agree. Boneyard90 (talk) 04:14, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]


I disagree. This article is about the device, not the strategy or history of suicide terrorism. In fact the references to the arrests by the Palestinian Authority (which are cited as a reason for the reduction in use of C4 in the Middle East, with the implication that all or the vast majority of suicide attacks take place in Israel/Palestine - this ignores the much more frequent attacks in Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria...) should also be removed. The politics are too complex to broach in this article, and would be best addressed in an article on suicide terrorism. On the other hand, regional/factional differences in explosive vest design and construction would be interesting. [No idea how to sign off - Mike, 17/10/2013] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.28.213.126 (talk) 13:00, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


History section

The History section, all three sentences of it, is completely useless. It needs to be re-written, objectively. Boneyard90 (talk) 22:18, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Boneyard90I think you would agree it's become much better by today: [1] Ken K. Smith (a.k.a. User:Thin Smek) (talk) 09:41, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Explosive belt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:35, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Explosive belt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:46, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Explosive belt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:30, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 9 September 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved (non-admin closure) Bada Kaji (talk • श्रीमान् गम्भीर) 10:15, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Explosive belt → Suicide vest – Most common term used according to Google Search Trends and Google Ngram Viewer – Anne drew 19:12, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose. In my opinion, an "explosive belt" is more self-describing than a "suicide vest". Especially, if you aren't familiar with the second one. The second term also has a negative connotation. Another reason is that a "suicide" vest is misleading in some cases ("Body-packed bombs can be detonated remotely by terrorists who have duped an agent into wearing a vest" The Globe and Mail).--Russian Rocky (talk) 11:41, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Explosive_belt&oldid=1207266605"