Jump to content

Talk:Technocracy (Mage: The Ascension)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) at 00:25, 5 February 2024 (Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Capitalization

[edit]

I reverted your page movement so as to comply with Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Titles - article title should not contain excess capitalization. -- Forseti 08:50, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)

1While true, we are (in this case) talking about a propper noun. By virtue of its being a title and subtitle (as opposed to a mere descriptive adjective), "The" should be capitalized, just as it is on every other World of Darkness product line is. More to the point however, since 90% of all WoD product references are capitalized, these few which fail to follow propper capitalization rules for titles make the general family of WoD articles inconsistent. --Belarius 19:23, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Introduction

[edit]

I edited the introductory paragraph to bring it more in line with the intent of the authors who wrote the actual fiction on which the article is based. It had previously displayed a bias. I should probably add a "controversy" section into the article itself covering this topic, as the Technocracy's status vis-a-vis antagonism is something the fanbase spends a lot of time arguing about. --Stephenls 1:42, 28 Oct 2006 (UTC)

Merge discussion

[edit]

I know that this is important to Mage: The Ascension, but notability is not inherited after all and this article does not show any individual notability outside of Mage: The Ascension. Thus, I think this should be merged either into the main article or some sort of list. Also, before anyone mentions the other WoD articles, remember that other stuff exists and just because they have an article doesn't mean this deserves one (or, indeed, that the other articles deserve to exist). – Harry Blue5 (talkcontribs) 23:18, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]