Jump to content

Talk:Women in science: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

29 February 2024

25 March 2023

15 April 2022

1 March 2022

17 January 2022

5 October 2021

9 August 2021

19 December 2020

18 December 2020

17 December 2020

15 December 2020

14 December 2020

8 December 2020

7 December 2020

25 November 2020

18 November 2020

6 November 2020

12 August 2020

22 July 2020

18 May 2020

8 March 2019

27 February 2019

22 September 2018

14 August 2018

31 October 2017

1 October 2017

5 June 2017

30 March 2017

1 January 2017

8 December 2016

1 December 2016

21 November 2016

28 October 2016

14 March 2016

29 February 2016

13 January 2016

24 November 2015

  • curprev 01:5001:50, 24 November 2015 SineBot talk contribs m 45,611 bytes +282 Signing comment by 129.174.182.5 - "Seriously, I honestly can't imagine in what world the argument that men lost to history invalidates the action of unearthing women lost to history. You have fucking Einstein, P... undo
  • curprev 01:4801:48, 24 November 2015 129.174.182.5 talk 45,329 bytes +85 Seriously, I honestly can't imagine in what world the argument that men lost to history invalidates the action of unearthing women lost to history. You have fucking Einstein, Planck, Newton, Feynman, the list goes on and on and on what more do you want? undo
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)