This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot(talk | contribs) at 06:03, 11 February 2024(Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Israel}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 06:03, 11 February 2024 by Cewbot(talk | contribs)(Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Israel}}.)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
"thus both dodging the anti-sanction proceedings being brought against them." This is the last sentence in the body of the article, just after the author mentioned that the brothers DIED. I do not think that the brothers intentionally died specifically to dodge a lawsuit. Attributing a reason for their deaths is both unjustified and crass. I did not edit the page because I'm not going to take the time to fully research the matter - I came to this page for info on the ownership of ZIM Integrated Shipping, not to find out when and why the Ofer brothers died. However, I would suggest that this article be revisited, and in particular the language of the last paragraph be changed to respect the dead. Redlion145 (talk) 22:11, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I very much agree-- the way it's written now ("...both dodging...") is not right. It is not impartial, neutral language. Not sure what it should be, however, or whether the phrase should just go entirely. Thoughts? Hutchie6 (talk) 23:15, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The Ofer Brothers Group is one of the richest and most influential familes in Israel and have possesion of international companies. They definatly deserve their own article. Acidburn24m (talk) 14:23, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
