User talk:76.20.88.33

May 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to The Taking of Pelham 123 (2009 film) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: The Taking of Pelham 123 (2009 film) was changed by 76.20.88.33 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.948877 on 2016-05-04T05:56:44+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:56, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Besides Wikipedia, what other Websites are Appropriate for Questions about any Movie?}}(76.20.88.33 (talk) 21:06, 7 May 2016 (UTC)).

You could try IMDb or Rotten Tomatoes. JohnCD (talk) 22:23, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

June 2016

Please refrain from making changes to plot summaries/synopses that conflict with the plot summary edit guides, as you did at I Know What You Did Last Summer. You may wish to review the specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. Excessive detail and high word counts should be avoided. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 13:20, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at I Know What You Did Last Summer.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Please review WP:FILMPLOT as I noted above. Your edits are increasing the length of the plot beyond the guideline. You need to discuss this at the article's talk page and obtain a consensus for doing so. Thank you for your understanding. DonIago (talk) 13:21, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at The Taking of Pelham 123 (2009 film).

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Opencooper (talk) 00:47, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Recent edit to 22 Jump Street

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Ueutyi (talk) 04:51, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use talk pages for inappropriate discussions. Jac16888 ^Talk 18:49, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2016

Hello, I'm Mdann52. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Batman: Mask of the Phantasm— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mdann52 (talk) 17:14, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jac16888 ^Talk 20:00, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

76.20.88.33 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

It is True that the Cloaked Figure is a Good Person automatically in Batman Mask of Phantasm, so why did I get blocked? (76.20.88.33 (talk) 22:35, 13 July 2016 (UTC))

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Optimist on the run (talk) 23:09, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Help Me

For Disturbia 2007 Film, is it okay to say that the Guy was Talking on a Cellphone in the Beginning?(76.20.88.33 (talk) 18:55, 16 July 2016 (UTC)).

Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. So no, unless it really had an impact on the plot it would not be okay to say that. --Majora (talk) 19:06, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

For Batman Mask of Phantasm, is it okay to say that the cloaked figure is a good person for killing Chuckie because Chuckie was a bad man? (76.20.88.33 (talk) 19:10, 16 July 2016 (UTC)).

That would be a matter of personal opinion, so no, that's not appropriate. I think we have been at this for literally years, and I'm not sure writing plot summaries is quite your thing. You may want to find something else to do on Wikipedia when this block runs out. Also, if you continue with this line of questioning while blocked, talk page access may be revoked. You should focus on the block. Huon (talk) 19:12, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

It is automatically true that the cloaked figure is a good person. Why would that be an Opinion!!!!!!!!!!(76.20.88.33 (talk) 23:17, 16 July 2016 (UTC)).

July 2016

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jac16888 ^Talk 23:09, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

76.20.88.33 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am sorry. Next time before I post something, I ask you if my edit will be Appropriate?

Decline reason:

Yes, using the talk page to discuss edits beforehand is a good idea if you are not sure if they are appropriate. When your block expires, I suggest doing that. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:05, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

76.20.88.33 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please unblock me now, then I will ask permission if my edits are appropriate? (76.20.88.33 (talk) 19:07, 21 July 2016 (UTC))

Decline reason:

I don't see a rationale for unblocking here. You explicitly state that you want to express an unsubstantiated opinion without referring to verifiable and reliable sources, and cannot seem to understand why this isn't acceptable. We have policies and guidelines around this, in particular WP:NPOV, WP:RS, and WP:V. If you can describe your understanding of those documents, and describe your understanding of why you got blocked, convince us that you can edit within policies and guidelines, then the block length can be reduced. But unless that happens, no administrator will consider unblocking you. Please don't waste our time with further 1-liner unblock requests. They will not be granted. You need to do more than that if you want this block lifted. ~Amatulić (talk) 05:24, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

August 2016

Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Caught in the Crossfire have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 18:33, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Caught in the Crossfire. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 16:59, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Law & Order: Special Victims Unit (season 4).

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Davejohnsan (talk) 17:21, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jac16888 ^Talk 21:34, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

September 2016

Hello, I'm Justin15w. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to The Marine have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Justin15w (talk) 00:57, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jac16888 ^Talk 17:23, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

76.20.88.33 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please unblock me. I mistakenly believed that my edits were valid for Marine film. If you unblock me, then I will use the helpme template before editing.(76.20.88.33 (talk) 22:28, 8 October 2016 (UTC)).

Decline reason:

You still don't understand how Wikipedia works. I suggest you read WP:V, WP:NPOV, and WP:RS. Otherwise, the comments by Amatulic above still apply. PhilKnight (talk) 00:05, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

January 2017

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to The Departed. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 01:34, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Plots

Please see MOS:PLOT limit the length. You can retrieve your edit from the wp:edit history. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 06:03, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jac16888 ^Talk 23:03, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

August 2017

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  only (talk) 02:29, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

76.20.88.33 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Come on I only saw "You will soon be blocked" but Nobody said "Definitely Blocked" so Please unblock Me?

Decline reason:

No. We are not obliged to inform you before blocking your access. Yunshui ^雲_水 08:08, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

seriously?

I did Not know It was Wrong for Me to Ask questions about Films on Entertainment Desk. I was Given permission along Time ago. Although the Discusion was Closed, it Did not Make sense Why?(76.20.88.33 (talk) 06:50, 15 August 2017 (UTC)).