Jump to content

User talk:Kfc1864

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kfc1864 (talk | contribs) at 00:58, 28 October 2007 (ok). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Thanks

Thanks for the Wikichevrons :) Parsecboy 12:30, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed it. You forgot the little | after the WikiChevrons bit. Thanks again :) Parsecboy 12:36, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A warning

User:Winky Bill (who is likely the permanently banned user User:Jetwave Dave; yeah, he apparently has a thing for me :) ) has recently copied the award you gave me this morning to his own user page, complete with your signature. I don't know what you want to do about it, but I thought you might want to know. Parsecboy 22:13, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thx

Thx a lot my friend. I will fix that later.

Loves

Kızılsungur 05:42, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XVIII (August 2007)

The August 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 09:43, 5 September 2007 (UTC) [reply]


Hello, I read your statement you made on the South Korean hostage article's discussion and I was wondering if you would not mind weighing in on the current murder vs kill terminology used to describe the acts that were committed against the South Koreans. Being how wiki is about presenting an unbiased truth, I thought that the criminal act of homicide that was committed should be recorded and presented to the general public. However, others believe that murder has too much bias attributed to it and think that it should be killed so as to not say that the terrorists were unjust in taking the lives of their victims. While I agree that I was overboard with saying "murdered in cold blood," I do feel that murdered is truth and not in any way a form of bias. Would you mind weighing in on the article's discussion board?

74.243.81.189 19:36, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much :)

For your comment and inquiry [1]. I've reviewed your userpage, and some of your edit history, and I would be a proud to be adopted by you.

I would eventually like a decent user-page that reflects my vision of Wikipedia and the contributions I intend to make, however I have very little direction and seem to be quickly drawn into vandal fighting (it is non-stop!). So I apologize for my userpage's rather blank look. It would be an honor if you adopt me and help develop my contribution skills. I'll await your reply! DigitalNinja 02:24, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is this kind of [2] diff the kind of thing you want to see? DigitalNinja 03:08, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe this too? [3] :) DigitalNinja 05:08, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RFA Thanks

Not particularly, no. But thanks for the note :)  — Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 09:35, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please, explain

Why is my Wikipedia "My talk" page scheduled for demolition. My family history is on it. Please, don't elete it without first explaining to me what is going on -- Thank you -- BTW, I can't sign here until I get home. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Migdiachinea (talkcontribs) 17:18, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

__________________________________________________________________________________

Hi -- sir or madam: I thought this was my talk page -- how is it a bulletin board? Please, explain. Mig 13:29, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Dead Body With Clear Face in the Article Korea War

Hi Kfc1864, thanks for the message, I found the previous discusion. I still feel very upset about this bloody picture with clear face as the soldier's identity. I wish you understand. Dongwenliang 15:28, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

please

May I ask you to please limit your comments at Goguryeo:Talk to editing-related issues. After all, as per the policies of Wikimedia, article talk pages are not a forum to discuss related ideas -- article talk pages are strictly for discussions related to editing only. Comments like yours are not necessaruily bad BUT they tend to stir the pot -- as you can see some misinformed editor has left an equally off-topic comment. I hope you may see my point and help us to keep the article and the talk page on topic. Regards, 70.53.130.220 12:08, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XIX (September 2007)

The September 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 09:50, 8 October 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Hi there, the article has been changed substantially since your vote so you might want to have another look at the new version. All the best Tim Vickers 16:05, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]