Jump to content

User talk:Poliocretes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

.

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Good luck, and have fun. FWIW, Bzuk (talk) 19:43, 28 May 2009 (UTC).[reply]

IAF's "Records and highlights"

[edit]

Agree. 11:42, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Battle of Karameh

[edit]

Hi. I just saw you added info on the IAF participation in the battle. Can you add references for that? cheers, Nudve (talk) 05:49, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nudve, all the info is from the IAF official page already referenced inside the table (next to the "Air Force(elements)" title). Besides formating the squadron names a little, the two helicopter squadrons I added are already described on the IAF page but were missing from the table, and the reference to 113 as a helicopter squadron is anachronistic. Poliocretes (talk) 06:28, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
OK. thanks. -- Nudve (talk) 08:57, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Pic

[edit]

Hi, What you said is right, but according to the israeli law this pic is not a public domain and according to the egyptian law it`s a public domain. So what do you think ?? (answer in my talk page) --Mohamed Salim talk 11:51, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't be surprised too, you are welcome :)--Mohamed Salim talk 15:11, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bir Gifgafa

[edit]

Hi Poliocretes! Cheers for creating an excellent article. One comment though—in Egyptian Arabic, there is generally no J sound, and ج is pronounced G (e.g. Gamal Abd al-Nasser, Muhammad Naguib, etc.). All English-language sources I know of spell it Bir Gifgafa. Are there any sources that spell it with a J? I will move the article if you don't object. —Ynhockey (Talk) 00:06, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ynhockey, thanks for the compliments. I actually started out with the name Bir Gifgafa, but then found a number of references using the J variant. I assumed the G variant was a westernized version of the Arab name and therefore went with what I thought was closer to the original. Feel free to make any changes you think necessary. Poliocretes (talk) 06:33, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It appears that all of the online English-language sources in the article use the Gifgafa spelling. I will move the article to that title. Thanks again for creating it, and I hope you create more! You might want to look at Tel Nof Airbase and Nevatim Airbase, both in very bad condition. Cheers, Ynhockey (Talk) 23:01, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ptolemaic Baris

[edit]

Just saw this when patrolling new pages - have you considered submitting it to Did You Know? It gets featured on the main page, and I find passers-by are normally kind enough to give articles there a free copyedit. Ironholds (talk) 09:13, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Ironholds, I'll look into how one goes about submitting an article. Poliocretes (talk) 09:28, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP Israel

[edit]
You are invited to join WikiProject Israel, an attempt to build and maintain an extensive and neutral database of Israel related articles on Wikipedia. To join, simply add your name to the members section of WikiProject Israel.

—Ynhockey (Talk) 13:15, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Arrow (missile)

[edit]

May I ask for your help with it, in case you are interested with the subject? Some native speakers say the article desperately needs a good copyedit, and unfortunately my English isn't good enough. Thanks in advance. Flayer (talk) 16:06, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks! The most important thing is the referenced content. Grammar isn't my strong skill. Flayer (talk) 19:27, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The Cleanup Barnstar
I, Flayer, hereby award you the the Cleanup Barnstar for your effort on cleaning the Arrow (missile) article. Keep up the good work! Flayer (talk) 20:20, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you speak Swedish?

[edit]

If you do, read the article you want to have as a source, it does not say what you claim it does. If you don't, what's the point of adding material that you do not understand? Whatever the case, the source does not support the claim of antisemitism and cannot be used to support a claim it never makes. I don't like Aftonbladet myself, but we try to respect sources here.Jeppiz (talk) 22:48, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just to make myself clear, I do not have objections at all to a section being critical of Aftonbladet and I'll be glad to help. That's not the problem. That section needs to have proper sources, though, and the claims have to based on the sources, not on our personal interpretations of them.Jeppiz (talk) 22:51, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again

[edit]

First of all, sorry for sounding rude the last time. I was in a hurry and wrote in a haste, and it came out sounding more abrubt that than I wanted. With hindsight, I should just have waited as the world would hardly have come to an end with the passage being there for two more hours :-) Now, I know you didn't write it and I know the user who did claims to speak Swedish. It surprises me somewhat, as the article is very clear in its message. Knowing the background in this matter is useful. Aftonbladet is, in my opinion and in the opinion of most Swedish speakers, a rather bad newspaper even though it sells a lot. Its reputation is a bit like The Sun in the UK or New York Post in the US. Unlike high-brow Swedish newspapers such as Dagens Nyheter or Svenska Dagbladet, they don't have subscribers and thus have to sell by have sensationalist content. Its credibility is very very low, and you can hardly open it without finding a big "SCANDAL"-this or "SCANDAL"-that. I'm a Finn myself, and if I had a euro for every time they've been writing slight insults or outright nonsense about Finland I'd be a rich man. Though that's nothing compared to what they write about Norway, it's even worse for Denmark, there are regular insults on the French, the Eastern Europeans, the US. So it's not in any way an anti-Israeli newspaper, it's a newspaper that sells by finding big "scandals" and by appealing to the lowest and most sensationalist in people. On a side-note, the source used in the paragraph, Newsmill, is very similar. While Aftonbladet is sensationalist and left-wing paper, Newsmill is sensationalist and right-wing Internet-publication. Politics aside, neither of them is very credible and both are extremly biased in their view of the world. I'll be happy to see a long section containing criticism of Aftonbladet, and there is really A LOT to criticise, but we have to be able to be fair in our criticism and not stoop to the same level. I'll be happy to help to contribute, and my apologies for not writing this the first time instead of coming across as a brute.Jeppiz (talk) 01:15, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, Jeppiz, thanks for writing. Poliocretes (talk) 01:59, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Milhist!

[edit]

Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around!  Roger Davies talk 03:03, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIII (September 2009)

[edit]

The September 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:33, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Test your World War I knowledge with the Henry Allingham International Contest!

[edit]

As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:16, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIV (October 2009)

[edit]

The October 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:16, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XIV (November 2009)

[edit]

The November 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:31, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Amir Drori

[edit]

Thanks for creating the article! You are helping to complete the list :) Congratulations also for making the first WP Israel article of 2010. Have a nice year! Cheers, Ynhockey (Talk) 17:39, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

re: Baris, Acra & Antonia

[edit]
I've wondered if Simon might have both occupied the Acra, then later razed it once he no longer felt it useful (as it would have been too far inside other fortifications to be of much defensive use)? If Ben-Dov has identified the correct foundations, then it does seem to have been razed during that general period (overbuilt with a residential quarter in the Hasmonean period, which was later leveled by Herod for construction of the street and plaza in front of the new Temple platform extension). But, whether leveled by Simon or afterwards, I haven't seen any published finds narrowing the destruction date beyond "latter half of the 2nd century BCE".
The Second Temple Period article has been sitting on my watch list for some time, as I had been thinking of contributing to it myself. I was very relieved to see you contributing a good number of edits to it, as I haven't had time. • Astynax talk 21:20, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, I'm wondering if some of the tags at the top of the article shouldn't come off. It is in much better shape now, despite needing a few reference. • Astynax talk 21:21, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVI (December 2009)

[edit]

The December 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:17, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: et-Tell...

[edit]

Do you know where to find a reference for the Galileeian et-Tell? Will edit out the link with an explanation, but would feel better having some sort of authority to reference. Thank you, Shir-El too 11:48, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! I will update the article accordingly. Cheers! Shir-El too 17:04, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yom Kippur War

[edit]

Hi. I saw that you tinkered with Yom Kippur War and also had some interest in the military project. Jiujitsuguy has been improving it and I was wondering if you had any feedback. Do you see any holes (content or Wikifying wise) that need to be filled?Cptnono (talk) 09:41, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet. He asked me for a hand awhile ago but it seems to be coming along just fine. Thanks again for the feedback on the image.Cptnono (talk)
I knew it was a borderline photo. Hell, they were probably using bows and arrows when this pic was taken but it depicted four very central figures in the war and so I gave it a shot. As for content, I intend on expanding the battles for the bridgeheads (Oct 15-24). This aspect seems to have been glossed over though it represented a key phase of the war on the southern front. Details on the battles in the north (on the Syrian front) also seem spotty and so I'll be adding sourced content there as well. Best regards,--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 07:32, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Poliocretes. I appreciate your encouragement, advice and kind words. I'm a bit pressed for time at the moment but intend to add additional content and effectuate more substantive edits in the near future. Again many thanks.--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 17:47, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

KoL edits

[edit]

Hi Poliocretes,

I just dropped by to thank you for your excellent work on the article on Kings of Leon. Thanks, and happy editing! --Soetermans | drop me a line | what I'd do now? 21:44, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rimon 20

[edit]

Excellent work. Thoroughly researched and well written. I made some minor edits involving spelling and style but really great work on your part. Well done!--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 00:23, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVII (January 2010)

[edit]

The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:30, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Operaiton Avak

[edit]

Hi Poliocretes! I have removed the problematic part, and you are right of course about RAF Aqir. The source is not clear on the matter an I am far from being an expert on air force matters (my interest lies mainly in the ground forces). Please note that I plan to expand the article in the future from the vast information that can be found in Avi Cohen's book(s) on the IAF during the War of Independence, which would likely make this point moot. Cheers, Ynhockey (Talk) 20:09, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. If you have time, please assess my articles, as no one has done it and it's been weeks. Thanks! Ynhockey (Talk) 20:09, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Rimon 20

[edit]
Updated DYK query On February 12, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Rimon 20, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:07, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

[edit]

Unfaithful to the article, to Wikipedia... isn't that what we're working to improve?

I did not mention you because I was not referring to you alone, and because I don't want to turn this into a back-and-forth game of finger-pointing and criticism, since it is far from constructive, and not for any other cause whatsoever. All I was trying to say is, you have been aware of the discussions at the YKW article. Yet you did not comment on the lead which mentioned Soviet threats without American counter-threats, ceasefire violations, etc... which were an important context to that event, and did not present the suggestion you gave during the recent discussions. I regarded this as insincere. As I said, if I'm mistaken, then I apologize. Respectfully, --Sherif9282 (talk) 12:22, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the March 2010 Military history Project Coordinator elections now open!

[edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:12, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVIII (February 2010)

[edit]

The February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:06, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinator elections have opened!

[edit]

Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:13, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

re: Acra rewritten

[edit]

The rewrite gives a good overview. I have made some small changes: spelling and a couple of very minor clarifications. Excellent job! • Astynax talk 18:24, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If no additional or major issues regarding the article are raised by next week, I intend to nominate this for GA status. It really is an excellent overview. • Astynax talk 20:18, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I noticed that picture showed the gate/steps area along the south wall of the Mount. I changed the description because I am certain that some readers will mistakenly assume that the wall of the Mount was a remnant of the Akra itself. You are correct, the caption should better explain this. If you wish to change the caption yourself, please do. Otherwise I will attempt prior to nominating. The exact wording won't affect the GA process itself, and changes may still be made during and after the GA review. GA is mainly concerned with whether the article is encyclopedic, is well-written, and adheres to Wiki standards. There are a few other tweaks (format, not to do with the text itself) which also need to be addressed that a GA reviewer might flag, so I'll do those, too. Thanks again for your improvements. • Astynax talk 23:57, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The DYK came at an opportune time, with some additional tweaks. I've put the article into the GA queue. Now we mostly just wait. Once a reviewer begins to review it, a notice should appear at the top of the talk page, with a link to the review page where a reviewer may ask questions or give comments. It is a good way to get comments for improvements both for GA and higher classes. • Astynax talk 21:29, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The GA review has started. No questions or comments yet. You may want to monitor the review page occasionally during the next few days, just in case the reviewer has a question. I intend to check the page periodically as well. We don't have to be on top of it constantly, but we don't want questions to go unanswered for days, either. This is an experienced reviewer who recently left useful comments for another article I've helped edit, so that's good. • Astynax talk 06:44, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Poliocretes was instrumental in making Acra (fortress) a GA Congratulations, the article has passed the review and now has GA status! • Astynax talk 17:32, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fw: Masada

[edit]

You're absolutely right! I didn't noticed that, now I have to change the numbers starting from 28 to add a new one... :'( Hehe, no big deal. I'm very glad you noticed that mistake, and for you like the map too. It was funny to do. Thank you for warning me! Kordas (sínome!) 22:28, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I want to add the commandant's residence too, it's really no problem to do that. So the map will be more complete. If you see any other mistake I'll appreciate you tell me :) Cya! Kordas (sínome!) 00:07, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Done Easy to do, I just added a new number and rename the following. Regards, Kordas (sínome!) 12:38, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you!! That was my first Barnstar here. I'm happy to see there is people who likes that work, and for me to feedback everybody all I learned about this awesome place. Cya! Kordas (sínome!) 13:49, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Acra (fortress)

[edit]
Updated DYK query On April 4, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Acra (fortress), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:03, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIX (March 2010)

[edit]

The March 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:26, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Yael Rom

[edit]
Updated DYK query On April 9, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Yael Rom, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 02:32, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

[edit]

Here is my gratitude for your barnstar :) I changed some refs because of Spanish needs, but its soul is all yours. I also did this edition to give some coordinates, and I want to show you this picture as well. May be it can be uploaded to Commons. Regards! Kordas (sínome!) 20:25, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

M5P

[edit]

I was only trying to proved that their home base has changed inventory but whatever --Jor70 (talk) 11:27, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : L (April 2010)

[edit]

The April 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:54, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tel Arad

[edit]

hi- I specified that Tel Arad is situated in what is called the Arad Plain in English because in hebrew, it is called literally the "Arad valley". you can do whatever you want with this info.--Sreifa (talk) 06:45, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jerusalem during the Second Temple Period

[edit]

I don't know if you've revisited this article recently. I did look over it again last week. There does seem to be some information in the article which does not directly deal with Jerusalem and which would probably better be heavily summarized (and even deleted in a few cases). I intend to go over the article and do some more serious editing as I have time during the next few weeks. It is possible that I might delete something that you think is relevant to the article, so I will note any major deletions on the talk page.

I am also going to ask for a WP:PR of the Acra article with a view to gathering suggestions to raising it to WP:FA status. Now that it has had a few more corrections, I think that a peer review should be the next step. • Astynax talk 07:24, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Siege of Yodfat

[edit]

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Discussing here because you asked me to discuss.

[edit]

So, you say other sources exist. Indeed they do. When one asks, "Who are the known leaders in the field of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict? (English-speaking)" the short list includes is Avi Shlaim and Sarah Roy. Their work, among others', would be the ones to use. Using Michael Oren's watery texts so much is just disappointing. You could use Benny Morris again, or Chomsky, or any of the reputable new historians. 174.54.92.106 (talk) 05:06, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion belongs on the article talk page, where any participant can contribute. But since you were kind enough, I'll say this: Your dislike of Oren is no justification for the complete removal of a subject about which multiple sources exist. There are other ways to deal with paragraphs that are not properly sourced short of outright removal. Poliocretes (talk) 05:29, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LI (May 2010)

[edit]

The May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:34, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK issue

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Operation Raviv at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Crum375 (talk) 03:35, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my reply under the entry. Thanks, Crum375 (talk) 12:51, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Raviv

[edit]

Good job! Much more than a translation. I'll copy your into back to Hebrew. Valleyofdawn (talk) 07:35, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Military operations conducted by the Israel Defense Forces

[edit]

This source (it's in Spanish):

El atentado pudo tener por objeto vengar el "raid" aéreo de la aviación israelí que mató a una treintena de militantes de Hezbollah en el valle libanés de Bekaa en mayo pasado y el reciente secuestro del jeque chiíta Dirani por un comando del Ejército hebreo.

Translation:

The attack [1994 AMIA bombing in Buenos Aires] could have been perpetrated to avenge the Israeli air force raid that killed about thirty militants of Hezbollah in the Beqaa Valley last May and the recent abduction of Sheikh Dirani by an Israeli commando team.

I think maybe I was wrong, because the Israeli airstrike was previous to Dirani's kidnapping.

It would be useful to know about that episode a little more (I mean the airstrike).--AndresHerutJaim (talk) 08:20, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Acra

[edit]

I did not want you to think that I had forgotten about bringing this up as a FA candidate. It has been a busy time of year, and I have only had brief periods in which to edit. The peer review has been closed, and I think that it is ready to go to the next step. As many people take vacations over the next few weeks (July 4 and Bastille Day) I was thinking we might wait for a few weeks to start this. Would you prefer FA candidacy start soon, or wait until mid-July?

I haven't forgotten about the Jerusalem during the Second Temple Period period article. You are correct that it is a mess, but I think the focus is the main problem. Much of the material is good, but I'm left wondering whether its purpose is to describe the city, or regional and political events during that time? I don't get much understanding about the city from the article. When I have time, I will probably work on it in a sandbox and ask for your thoughts. So far, I haven't thought of a good way to address it without offending the original editors. It may be necessary to remove good information which probably should go elsewhere, and even I do not like doing that. But every time I read over it, I get confused as to what would best be done. • Astynax talk 10:28, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have finished copyediting the article to try to get rid of repeated words, fix inconsistent tenses, and simplify punctuation. I probably missed some things, but I intend to do the nomination this evening anyway. We will see what happens. I'm not sure how long it will take the reviewers to start examining the article. • Astynax talk 00:44, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The nominations is now up at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Acra (fortress)/archive1 and you may want to watch that page over the next few days to see if the reviewers ask any questions or would like edits done. I intend to be watching, too. • Astynax talk 05:49, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently, there can be a co-nominator for FAC articles, so I've inserted you as co-nominator. I hope that is OK with you, although I'm not sure that it makes much difference, other than it allows me to nominate another article while this one is being reviewed. • Astynax talk 19:48, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Acra (fortress) The article is now FA class. Thanks for your help during the process! • Astynax talk 17:05, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Operation Raviv

[edit]

— Rlevse • Talk • 06:03, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LII (June 2010)

[edit]


The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LII (June 2010) 		Front page
Project news
Articles
Members
Editorial
Project news

Catch up with our project's activities over the last month, including the new Recruitment working group and Strategy think tank

Articles

Milhist's newest featured and A-Class content

Members

June's contest results plus the latest awards to our members

Editorial

LeonidasSpartan shares his thoughts on how, as individual editors, we can deal with frustration and disappointment in our group endeavour

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:31, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Robinson's Arch

[edit]

I've been doing a bit on the Robinson's arch article. I think it can also become a GA candidate with some further minor changes for consistency and a slightly expanded lead section.

The last section—Robinson's Arch#Egalitarian prayer site—is only a single paragraph, which could provoke some criticism from a GA reviewer. Can you think of anything to expand the section so that it contains at least 2 paragraphs? Alternatively, perhaps the section could be broadened to include other aspects of its current status. Maybe you have some ideas?

I was surprised that there does not seem to be an article on the Jerusalem Archaeological Park. I was going to insert wikilinks to it. The Archaeological Park is such a gem that it really deserves an article. But I cannot start an article because most of my information comes from visits and other sources which don't qualify as references. Do you, or other wikipedians you know, have enough to start an article? There are many articles which could link to that. Similarly, I hope that articles on Wilson's arch, the eastern arch and the Royal Stoa can eventually be done. I at least have a few references on these last two. • Astynax talk 02:59, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for expanding the section about the prayer site. It is excellent, and I think the article is now ready for a GA review. If you decide to start an article about the Archaeological Park, please put a link to it in the Robinson's Arch article. I think such an article could be brief with just links to the articles about the important individual features (Robinson's Arch, Ummayad Palace, Hulda Gates, etc.). Other people may want to expand it later. The existing City of David National Park doesn't tell much of anything about the Archaelogical Park. • Astynax talk 16:56, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated your article for DYK

[edit]

Hi Poliocretes! I have nominated 115 Squadron (Israel) for DYK. An excellent article, as usual. Keep up the good work! Cheers, Ynhockey (Talk) 17:03, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 115 Squadron (Israel)

[edit]

— Rlevse • Talk • 12:02, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

[edit]

Hello,Poliocretes, Thank you very much for your help with Operation Diamond. Would you mind, if I am to include you as my co-author in my DYK nomination? Regards.--Mbz1 (talk) 20:22, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ma'agan Michael Ship

[edit]

The DYK project (nominate) 12:02, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Re: F-16I photo

[edit]

Hi, I'm glad that my pics are used. I have some more arrival pics an some about the aircraft being on static display with Delilah missile and Spice bomb carried. If I have some more free time, I'll upload more. --KGyST (talk) 10:13, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Have a time to copy edit my new article?

[edit]

Hi Poliocretes, do you have a time to copy edit Yolande Harmer Thanks.--Mbz1 (talk) 04:27, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIII (July 2010)

[edit]


The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIII (July 2010) 		Front page
Project news
Articles
Members
Editorial
Project news

New parameter for military conflict infobox introduced;
Preliminary information on the September coordinator elections

Articles

Milhist's newest featured and A-Class content

Members

July's contest results, the latest awards to our members, plus an interview with Parsecboy

Editorial

Opportunities for new military history articles

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:51, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Amarna/Execration texts

[edit]

Hi- The following discussion may interest you: Execration_text_places --Sreifa (talk) 05:02, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Robinson's Arch review

[edit]

Just a note that a reviewer is beginning a GA review for this article which you started. You may want to watch the review discussion here. • Astynax talk 07:46, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is now passed and has GA status. • Astynax talk 21:44, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


The Guidance Barnstar
For your efforts in providing citations for and promoting Acra (fortress) and Robinson's Arch • Astynax talk 22:20, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Giora Romm

[edit]

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIV (August 2010)

[edit]


The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIV (August 2010) 		Front page
Project news
Articles
Members
Editorial
Project news

The return of reviewer awards, task force discussions, and more information on the upcoming coordinator election

Articles

A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles, including a new featured sound

Members

Our newest A-class medal recipients and this August's top contestants

Editorial

In the first of a two-part series, Moonriddengirl discusses the problems caused by copyright violations

To change your delivery options for this newsletter please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:41, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Amir Nachumi

[edit]

-- Cirt (talk) 06:02, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Milhist election has started!

[edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.

With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team,  Roger Davies talk 19:31, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Beit Netofa Valley

[edit]

— Rlevse • Talk • 12:02, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

triple crown

[edit]
G'day, it gives me great pleasure to bestow the Triple Crown upon Poliocretes for your contributions in articles about Israel at WP:DYK, WP:GA, and WP:FA. cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 05:35, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


I hereby award you this Photographer's Barnstar for your awesome pictures at Hazorim.--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 19:10, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Royal Stoa (Jerusalem)

[edit]

— Rlevse • Talk • 00:03, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Avi Lanir

[edit]

Seems a bit strange that PM Meir would be willing to cede Hermon for POWs. Perhaps she was will to cede that portion of the Syrian Hermon captured in 73 but certainly not the Israeli part captured in 67.--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 18:19, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We don't know when the offer was made, it could have been at a point when the outpost on the Hermon had not been retaken yet. Lanir is also reputed to have been in possession of valuable state secrets, Avner Cohen is not alone in assuming these were related to Israel's nuclear capabilities. In any case, several Israeli publications have already repeated the claim, including a book about the war and an article in Ma'ariv. Poliocretes (talk) 19:22, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Acra (fortress) is scheduled to appear as the main page featured article in the near future

[edit]

Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of this article know that it will be appearing as the main page featured article on November 1, 2010. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/November 1, 2010. If you think that it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured article director, Raul654 (talk · contribs). If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :D Thanks! TbhotchTalk C. 00:27, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Excavated remains of a building tentatively identified as part of the Acra

The Acra was a fortified compound in Jerusalem of the 2nd century BCE. Built by Antiochus Epiphanes, ruler of the Seleucid Empire, following his sack of the city in 168 BCE, the fortress played a significant role in the events surrounding the Maccabean Revolt and the formation of the Hasmonean Kingdom. It was destroyed by Simon Maccabeus during this struggle. The exact location of the Acra, critical to understanding Hellenistic Jerusalem, remains a matter of ongoing discussion. Historians and archaeologists have proposed various sites around Jerusalem, relying mainly on conclusions drawn from literary evidence. This approach began to change in the light of excavations which commenced in the late 1960s. New discoveries have prompted reassessments of the ancient literary sources, Jerusalem's geography and previously discovered artifacts. Yoram Tsafrir has interpreted a masonry joint in the southeastern corner of the Temple Mount platform as a clue to the Acra's possible position. During Benjamin Mazar's 1968 and 1978 excavations adjacent to the south wall of the Mount, features were uncovered which may have been connected with the Acra, including barrack-like rooms and a huge cistern. (more...)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LV (September 2010)

[edit]


The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LV (September 2010) 		Front page
Project news
Articles
Members
Editorial
Project news

The results of September's coordinator elections, plus ongoing project discussions and proposals

Articles

A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles

Members

Our newest A-class medal recipients, this September's top contestants, plus the reviewers' Roll of Honour (Apr-Sep 2010)

Editorial

In the final part of our series on copyright, Moonriddengirl describes how to deal with copyright infringements on Wikipedia

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 20:21, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Happy Poliocretes's Day!

[edit]

User:Poliocretes has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian,
and therefore, I've officially declared today as Poliocretes's day!
For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian,
enjoy being the Star of the day, dear Poliocretes!

Peace,
Rlevse
00:27, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A record of your Day will always be kept here.

For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it.

For a user ribbon you can use, see

Awesome Wikipedian
Awesome Wikipedian

— Rlevse • Talk • 00:27, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Marivagia stellata

[edit]

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Acra - today's featured article

[edit]
Hello Poliocretes, Sreifa has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Tel en Nasbeh

[edit]

Hi- Can you take a look at this: Talk:Tell en-Nasbeh#location ? Thanks --Sreifa (talk) 06:32, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, come on

[edit]

Dude, come on —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.79.92.53 (talk) 05:35, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 1973 Syrian General Staff Headquarters Raid

[edit]

-- Cirt (talk) 06:04, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit

[edit]

Since you called Nableezys edit a "battle", where he removed a map of Israel for a location internationally recognized as in Syria, what about your edit where you insert a map of Israel for a location internationally recognized as in Syria, what do you consider your edit? ? --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 11:01, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I did not insert the Israel map in the first place, it was there for years. Furthermore, I did not object to the map you suggested either. It's just a map, and as I've said countless times before, it's meaningless. The sentiment apparent in the "no map is preferable to an incorrect one", however, is a clear indication that the editor in question does not care about the subject of the article, Gamla, but in advancing his own political agenda. That is why he is being reverted. His (and your) insistence on going through countless articles/templates/categories/maps and changing the most practical and innocuous wording with political content that is as obvious as it is unnecessarily cumbersome ,is clear battlefield mentality. So is suggesting one map and then replacing the one in the article with another. Wikipedia is not an advocacy group. Poliocretes (talk) 16:00, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Roller bridge photo

[edit]

Heyo. Let me do a little research on the photo but if you really want to remove it immediately, I won't stand in your way since I hold you in very high regard as an editor.--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 16:00, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Modi Alon

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Modi Alon at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! PM800 (talk) 23:01, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Modi Alon

[edit]

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LVI, October 2010

[edit]

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:42, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Question

[edit]

What the heck is this? I'm obviously not a novice in the subject but I've never heard of it. It's not mentioned by Rabinovich, Pollack, Schiff, Herzog, van Creveld, Luttwak, Orr, Bar-On or anyone else of note. I don't even think Garwych mentions it and he empathizes with the Egyptian viewpoint and usually cites their figures. Looks like the primary reference for this article is an piece written by Sherif Sharmy who shares a similar name to the main contributor of this article. Could be a case of WP:OR and likely the product of sheer fantasy. Perhaps AfD is warranted. Your thoughts.--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 21:08, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYI--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 00:42, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010

[edit]

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:08, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Opera

[edit]

How come you don't think it' necessary to include the Hebrew translation for the name of the operation? I've also retained the Arabic designation of the reactor. I'm not saying you're wrong, I just generally feel that more information is better than less. Shoplifter (talk) 10:07, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Forget it, I just noted that you only removed the translation of the word "operation". All good. Shoplifter (talk) 10:10, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Tagar

[edit]

Is that the one that was going to take place during the opening days of the war? I never knew it was named such. What does it mean in Hebrew BTW? --Sherif9282 (talk) 23:37, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I probably read something about it, but I never knew of the name. I thank you. Cheers! --Sherif9282 (talk) 11:43, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

210 Squadron (Israel)

[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 210 Squadron (Israel), and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.210squadron.com.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:49, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Chalcolithic Temple of Ein Gedi

[edit]

Dravecky (talk) 08:05, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Israel-archaeology-stub

[edit]

No, that's fine, and it's a better picture too. I just tried to find a picture of an archaeological site in Israel, and Masada was famous enough that it made sense to try to find an image of that. The new template's one of a handful of new archaeology stub types - {{NEast-archaeology-stub}} might also be useful to you, for any sites in the surrounding countries. Grutness...wha? 10:43, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Operation Tarnegol

[edit]

The DYK project (nominate) 18:02, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LVIII, December 2010

[edit]


To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here. BrownBot (talk) 21:32, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Ambassador Program is looking for new Online Ambassadors

[edit]

Hi! Since you've been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, I wanted to let you know about the Wikipedia Ambassador Program, and specifically the role of Online Ambassador. We're looking for friendly Wikipedians who are good at reviewing articles and giving feedback to serve as mentors for students who are assigned to write for Wikipedia in their classes.

If that sounds like you and you're interested, I encourage you to take a look at the Online Ambassador guidelines; the "mentorship process" describes roughly what will be expected of mentors during the current term, which started in January and goes through early May. If that's something you want to do, please apply!

You can find instructions for applying at WP:ONLINE. The main things we're looking for in Online Ambassadors are friendliness, regular activity (since mentorship is a commitment that spans several months), and the ability to give detailed, substantive feedback on articles (both short new articles, and longer, more mature ones).

I hope to hear from you soon.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 01:53, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Davar article

[edit]

Thank you for the offer. I need an issue of Davar newspaper to resolve the context in which Rav Kook was quoted there, as some editors have insisted on including it in his article (see here). The date of issue is Davar for Sept. 26, 1988. The author is אייל כפכפי (Eyal Kafkafi) but I don't know what the article was called. Koakhtzvigad (talk) 11:27, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011

[edit]

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 16:31, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinates for historical topics

[edit]

Hi Poliocretes! I noticed that you contributed a lot to Israeli history and archaeology-related topics. I was wondering if you were willing to help with finding the coordinates for some of the places and events listed here. I have been working over the past months to shorten this list and managed to reduce it from a few hundred to 57. The eventual goal of course to reach 0, but the more coordinates I add, the harder the remaining ones become to find. Some entries on that list can be removed entirely, but only after verifying that the exact coordinates cannot be established.

If you are interested in helping, please find the coordinates for as many places as you can (they have to be exact though) via Google Maps, and paste the link here to get the Wiki-format coordinates (alternatively, you can send them to me). Any entries you can find or remove because their locations are not known, would be much appreciated. I am also going to request help from other users. Thanks, Ynhockey (Talk) 18:38, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your question re Judeo Aramaic

[edit]

Hi Poliocretes, thanks for your post on my talk. I have been doing some more research, and I am questioning my previous judgement. The sources I used suggest that Judeo-Aramaic was used for all documents, including coins, during the period in question. However, looking at the sources you provide, and cross-checking versus actual examples of paleo-hebrew, you may well be right. I will self revert and continue to research as I would like to confirm either way.

I wonder if the reason for the confusion in sources is that the Paleo-Hebrew alphabet is so similar to the old Aramaic alphabet, coupled with the fact that the languages of daily life at the time was Judeo-Aramaic. Personally, I can't understand why a script that had not been used for 600 years would have been put on the coins. The "nationalism" interpretation seems bunk to me, as there is no evidence that such nationalistic feelings existed anywhere in the world in Classical antiquity. It would be a really interesting addition if we could find sources to explain scholars' views as to what was happening on either Bar Kochba Revolt coinage or First Jewish Revolt coinage pages.

Oncenawhile (talk) 13:41, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is a bit of confusion created by various 'forces' in academia. Ivrit was the name of the Hebrew language and its writing system from ancient times. Because literacy was compulsory, it continued in use even after Ashurit was adopted for scribal use, and concurrently with the widespread adoption of Aramaic as 'common' spoken language. Therefore in the Talmud Ivrit is called 'writing of the [common] people'. Modern Hebrew also has two writing systems, the scribal Ashurit, and the cursive, with perhaps the Rashi script added as a third used in printing only (a variety on the cursive), but Modern Ivrit, despite what the Wikipedia Article says is really neither Modern, nor Ivrit Koakhtzvigad (talk) 14:53, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
K, thanks that is very interesting and very helpful thanks. That's cleared things up a lot for me. Looks like the Hebrew language and Hebrew alphabet articles could do with some improvement as I bemused by all this talk of Paleo-Hebrew which doesn't seem to be an appropriate name when used in a 2nd century AD context. Oncenawhile (talk) 19:40, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is very much appropriate, as it describes a script that even at that time was archaic. The Hebrew of the Roman period was written using the Phoenician script which modern Hebrew uses today. The coins bear the earlier, First Temple period, ancient Hebrew script, hence Paleo-Hebrew. As for why they would use such a script, one need only compare the way Tacitus writes about the Germans (Germania) and Brittons (Agricola) versus how he describes the Jews (Histories V) to see that even then Jews were not your run-of-the-mill minority. Call it nationalism, religious fervor or just plain obstinacy. Either way, this is Wikipedia and what the sources say counts. Poliocretes (talk) 19:55, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I wasn't suggesting using JudeoAramaic, i was suggesting the term "Ivrit" might be clearer. Paleo-hebrew makes it sound like some kind of pre-historic script, when in fact (according to Koakhtzvigad) it was in common parallel use at the time. By the way, i think you are getting mixed up above - Paleo-Hebrew is equivalent to Phoenician (see Paleo-Hebrew alphabet), while the hebrew script of the roman period is equivalent to square aramaic (see Biblical Aramaic). Oncenawhile (talk) 20:19, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not, but it doesn't really matter. I'm not interested in a philological discussion. Point is, Paleo-Hebrew is the commonly accepted academic term, it wasn't invented on Wikipedia. Describing the incriptions on the either the Great or Bar-Kochva Revolt coins an anything else, including "Ivrit", is WP:OR. Poliocretes (talk) 20:38, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011

[edit]

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:33, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Zir'in

[edit]

Greetings Poliocretes, I recently undid your edit at Zir'in where you claimed that Yizre'el was not Canaanite, but Israelite. The reason being is that the source used (Walid Khalidi) says it's Canaanite. He may be mistaken and it might have been an Israelite town (or both at different times), but could you attach a source (preferably secondary) to back the claim. Thank you ;) --Al Ameer son (talk) 20:38, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying. It would be great if you could add some of that info to the article if you have time. I know we link to Jezreel as the "Main article", but some more background info wouldn't hurt and could clarify the situation. I'll look into what source Khalidi uses for his claims of Canaanite history by tomorrow. Thanks again. --Al Ameer son (talk) 22:47, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Beit Loya/Lehi

[edit]

Hi Poliocretes - I'm trying to rework the Beit Loya page (Khirbet Beit Lehi) in my Sandbox (User:Sreifa/Sandbox), but there are sources I don't have access to, and the going is slow. I would appreciate any input at all. Thanks --Sreifa (talk) 08:35, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi- I don't have access to Hadashot Archiologiot 2:4–5 or Yediot Archiologiot(?) 27:235–265 from those years. Nor to the Map of Amazya [109, Vol. 1], Site 103) survey or "מערות מסתור בשפלת יהודה", or to any of the publications interpreting the inscriptions. As far as I'm concerned you (only) can edit my sandbox or the page directly-whatever you choose. (I started in the SB because it was such a mess.) I'll make an edit to the page with what I've done until now, with an "under construction" tag. Toda!--Sreifa (talk) 05:29, 6 April 2011 (UTC) Oh, and any info you have on the location/site/ID of "Samson's well"/עין הקורא would also be good.[reply]

Hodgen's Cemetery Mound

[edit]

Thanks for reviewing this nomination for DYK. I've proposed an alt hook; would you mind reviewing it as well? Nyttend (talk) 20:48, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Stoa

[edit]

I think getting Royal Stoa (Jerusalem) through GA is a good idea. After that, there are a few things which may need to be adjusted to go to FA level. I was wondering if you know of any new artifacts found from the Stoa as a result of the sifting of material from the "Solomon Stables" mosque construction? Any new published artifacts would make a good update before going on to FAC. • Astynax talk 17:20, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help, and congrats on the GA. I came across a recently published BAR article on the use of the Stoa as a mint that I need to summarize, and there is probably a bit more to be said about the destruction, physical evidence recovered, and perhaps a reference to the "Solomon's Stables" mosque construction controversy. • Astynax talk 17:54, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hershel Shanks reports David Ariel's (of the IAA) argument for the stoa being the site of a mint in "'Revolt' Coins Minted on Temple Mount", Biblical Archaeology Review, March/April 2011, pp. 58–59. It is a very speculative theory, due to absence of archaeological confirmation, but it is plausible. • Astynax talk 16:02, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Archaeology of Lebanon

[edit]

Great work on this! I was about to do something about it myself but you have saved me all the hassle. I may be adding to it soon, but won't be disturbing your excellent work! Outstanding. Paul Bedson ❉talk❉ 14:48, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Rhodes

[edit]

A query about your hook's waiting on the DYK page. Nice work on this piece, by the way. --Khazar (talk) 13:33, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Monastery of the Virgins

[edit]

Orlady (talk) 12:02, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free files in your user space

[edit]

Hey there Poliocretes, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Poliocretes/Sandbox2. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

  • See a log of files removed today here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:01, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011

[edit]

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 04:28, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Operation Rhodes

[edit]

Gatoclass (talk) 18:02, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Royal Stoa (Jerusalem)/GA1

[edit]

I've reviewed the article and left notes on the talk page. I've put the nomination on hold for seven days to allow the issues to be addressed. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, here, or on the article talk page with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:50, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hussein's Palace

[edit]

Thank you so, so, so much for the image you found and added at Hussein's Palace. It finishes off the article just perfectly! Chesdovi (talk) 16:14, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011

[edit]

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:26, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sayeret Matkal page

[edit]

Why did you undo my edit? I added tons of info from the "Secret Soldier" book mentioned in the further reading section. Yosy (talk) 01:58, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Holy crap dude, you're right. But I swear I read the article and it was the old revision, really strange. Already reverted to your version. I'm sorry to have messed up your work. Yosy (talk) 02:26, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

War over Water

[edit]

Hi Poliocretes! You probably have more knowledge than me about the War over Water, as well as more sources. I have a few sources myself, and may be able to get more. Do you want to collaborate on improving the article? I think that we should wait until the AfD finishes so that there's no problem nominating it for DYK when we're done with a 5x expansion. What do you think? —Ynhockey (Talk) 20:33, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine, I have time issues of my own :) but collaboration is always interesting. We should pick a weekend in which we can realistically increase the size five-fold. However, this does not mean that we should stop there, and each of us can add content later on. By the way, there's a Wikipedia meetup tomorrow at the Yarkon Park. Feel free to come if you wish. Cheers, Ynhockey (Talk) 18:37, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jerusalem during the Second Temple Period

[edit]

Oncenawhile (talk · contribs) has tried to do an end-run around the decision not to change the article name. Because you participated in the previous discussion, I thought you would be interested. You'll find the discussion here. Jayjg (talk) 21:57, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011

[edit]

To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:20, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

coins

[edit]

Hi Policretes, just to say your middle ground edits were appreciated. I hope the paragraph will encourage editors to find other sources - if you read what Conder's concerns were you must wonder whether he might have a point. I have spent about two days reading all the sources I can find on the topic, including a number of the key articles by de:Leo Mildenberg. But i cannot find a single piece of research proving the veracity of the coins - only ones which compare recent finds to those accepted as genuine when first found in the mid-nineteenth century. So I would love to know whether modern scholarship has really challenged the issues Conder raised - silence may prove nothing but maybe in the long term editors will come in with additional compelling references. Oncenawhile (talk) 21:19, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A 100-year old theory which has failed to gain any traction in academic discourse, predating numerous professional excavations which have repeatedly uncovered the abovementioned coins in datable stratefied contexts, does not constitute a "controversy". It's no more than an anecdote, or otherwise it would repeatly appear in modern academic discourse, which it doesn't, or you wouldn't have to rely on a source from 1909. As modern, academic, peer-reviewed publications do repeatedly discuss the coins but without discussing the "controversy", as the coins do repeatly appear in excavations from the time of the revolt, it appears that no one is discussing the veracity of the coins, as no one seriously doubts it. As you say, Oncenawhile, let's wait for future editors and their references. Poliocretes (talk) 22:44, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Poliocretes, you sure made me work pretty hard here! I enjoy working with you. Oncenawhile (talk) 13:47, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You seem to have gone to the library, I was very impressed. Poliocretes (talk) 18:40, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 69 Squadron (Israel)

[edit]

Calmer Waters 16:03, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011

[edit]

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 23:46, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why the fact tag?

[edit]

Here you added a fact tag although the source was in the sentence. Dougweller (talk) 08:01, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Siege of Jerusalem (63 BCE)

[edit]

PanydThe muffin is not subtle 08:02, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Al-Sinnabra

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Al-Sinnabra , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Sreifa (talk) 05:08, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011

[edit]

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 22:54, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXVI, August 2011

[edit]

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 18:32, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 147 Squadron (Israel)

[edit]

Materialscientist (talk) 16:04, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Israelite Tower

[edit]

Orlady (talk) 12:03, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

IAF Photos

[edit]

I respect your opinion, but I think that one of the important values to an article is uniformity. Right now the photos represent a certain logic - uniformity, chronological order correspondingly to the text, IAF marks, multitude of types, and each type is shown only once. More beautiful photos wouldn't make the article any better.

Though if we alter the whole scheme of the article, and the text, we can also replace photos and move to "right-left" positioning instead of the boring column. Flayer (talk) 19:00, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Galilee Squadron

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Galilee Squadron at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Clarityfiend (talk) 21:27, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Galilee Squadron

[edit]

Thanks from me for this article and hook Victuallers (talk) 00:03, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXVII, September 2011

[edit]

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 02:40, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Khirbet Qeiyafa‎ ref

[edit]

I thought as much about a technical issue with the ref but couldn't identify the problem. I reverted to simple form, temporarily, because the error message was an eyesore. I love what you're doing to this page. MichaelNetzer (talk) 18:16, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

why did u delete my edit

[edit]

why did you delete this edit this palace is in jerusalem!--Haya831 (talk) 13:20, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Rhodes

[edit]

Excellent article[1] Good job.--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 04:41, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

K.Q. ostracon

[edit]

Your kind words are nice on the heart, many thanks. Yes, I had the Puech drawing at He.WP, along with 4 others in the Hebrew University KQ project website. I wished we could use one of them on En.WP because the page seemed to need it, but none of those are copyright free and fair use seems to only apply the the Hebrew page. Maybe HU can release the one it most prefers, if they actually have a preference. I'm not sure because they've posted 4 versions with discrepancies between all of them, as if to give room for each as valid personal assessments. In doing mine as an artist's rendition and not a scholarly opinion, I wanted to be careful not to rely entirely on any one version, also so as not to have a possible copyright infringement. I think the major discrepancies are with Galil's version which differs the most from others. It's interesting that the HU sent him a letter of reprimand and posted it at the site, yet they also post his drawing, noting a heavier reconstruction, but not necessarily disagreeing with it. With all this in mind, I sort of made a salad of everything and meshed some elements from all of them into it. I'm not sure it was the best way to go but I'll look at it again. Your writing is a big inspiration and it's having an effect on how I approach the work also. Thanks again. --MichaelNetzer (talk) 18:35, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Volcano

[edit]

Given your demonstrated level of expertise on military matters, your input here is appreciated. Incidentally, there's another Operation Volcano concerning a British military op so I guess there has to be some sort of disambiguation. Best,--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 06:44, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your feedback, contributions and tweaks. They are always welcome.--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 05:10, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXVIII, October 2011

[edit]

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 08:39, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Siege of Jerusalem (37 BC)

[edit]

Orlady (talk) 01:38, 1 December 2011 (UTC) 08:03, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

War of Attrition

[edit]

I noticed that you made contributions to this article. I've uncovered numerous instances of egregious source distortions and usage of very poor non-mainstream sources to support fringe claims that border on fantasy. It's a daunting task but I'm trying to be as methodical as possible, drawing on a multiplicity of sources. It's very time consuming but I'll give it a go. If you have anything to add or you feel that I've erred, please don't hesitate to notify me, or better yet, just make the necessary corrections. I wont take a revert personally :)--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 03:41, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BTW excellent article[2] Well written with lots of good information.--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 04:10, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The War of Attrition article is indeed in rather poor shape. I'm glad to see to it finally getting the attention it needs. Best of luck, I'll try and give it a go myself. Poliocretes (talk) 11:19, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MILHIST Military Aviation Questionaire

[edit]

Hi Poliocretes! As your MILHIST Military Avation Task Force coordinator, I'd like to conduct a short questionaire to give me an idea of what you would the task force to achieve and the capabilities of yours that might contribute positively to the task force. The four questions of this questionaire are:

  1. What are your strengths on Wikipedia?
  2. Which four military aviation articles would you like to see be promoted to at least GA?
  3. What detailed resources (books, journals, etc) about military aviation do you have access to? Please provide the publications' authors, titles and ISSNs/ISBNs.
  4. Which three military aviation articles are you wiling to provide assistance? This can be expansion, copyediting, reference formatting, etc.

Please reply by copying and pasting the following at User talk:Sp33dyphil#MILHIST Military Aviation questionnaire and filling it out. 

; ~~~
#My strengths
#Articles I'd like to see the task force improve
#:
#:
#:
#:
#Sources which I have
#:
#:
#Articles I'm willing to provide assistance
#:

Thank you for your assistance. Regards --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 04:25, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Attack on IDF base

[edit]

Seriously, Poliocretes, I welcome your helpful edits and corrections. Often explaining them on the talk page helps preclude misunderstandings. Paul, in Saudi (talk) 12:53, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

acig

[edit]

What are your impressions of this blog and do you consider it a reliable source for exceptional claims not espoused by any mainstream source?--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 16:27, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Season's tidings!

[edit]

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 02:29, 25 December 2011 (UTC).[reply]

DYK for Rotem Crisis

[edit]

A Merry Christmas - and other winter festivities Victuallers (talk) 08:03, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]


The 25 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal
You gave us 25 times more knowledge, interesting well researched articles mostly related to Israel in history and present, thanks from the project, hoping for more --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:25, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nicole and Cooper

[edit]

I got hold of Nicole & Cooper's book, Mig 19/21 units in combat. In their book @ p.43, they say that the EAF claimed a total of 24 "for all fronts." The book does not specify how many the EAF claimed for the so-called El Mansoura battle. That represents a serious problem. Moreover, the Israeli source that is noted in the infobox[3] discusses the loss of two aircraft but not in the context of the so-called Mansoura battle, so its presence there is also problematic. I have requested citations for various exceptional claims but have received no reply. I've also dropped a note on the discussion page voicing my observations and concerns.--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 07:27, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Military Historian of the Year

[edit]

Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:07, 16 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.[reply]

Actually, I brought up the issue and agree it was WP:DRAMA and the worst discussion I've ever done, sorry

[edit]

Thank you for commenting on the obvious. LOL. It was a serious issue addressed at Talk:East Germany though that needed a response. But yeah, sure it was WP:DRAMA - both me and AndyTheGrump are to blame for this at the Talk:Israel article. We guys at Talk:East Germany won't bother you guys at Talk:Israel over this again. It was more of an issue of integrity on my part on statements I made at Talk:East Germany as well as relating to other users claims of East Germany being a satellite state, so I actually reluctantly agreed with the user I disagreed on other issues to resolve this integrity issue. I take it as a complement that it was the "worst discussion ever" - because I never wanted to initiate that controversial discussion in the first place, thank you for finding a policy to end the discussion. Anyways, long story shor: sorry for the trouble.--R-41 (talk) 21:42, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Tel Michal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
For your good work on Israel and Palestine related articles. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:56, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you! Poliocretes (talk) 15:33, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Tel Michal

[edit]

Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:02, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Megiddo church Google Book results

[edit]

Hi, there. I don't have a problem with the move particularly, but would like it discussed on the relevant Talk page(s) before considering whether an RM is needed.

  • 1. Re 07:56, 28 February 2012 (diff | hist) m Talk:Megiddo Church (New York) ‎ (moved Talk:Megiddo Church to Talk:Megiddo Church (New York): Article name already in use, difference of one capitalized letter insufficient) (top) ---- is there actually a WP policy that says articles with different capitalization can't co-exist?
  • 2. 438 of 439 Google Book results all point to the Church, not the archeological site.In ictu oculi (talk) 08:26, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Not that I'm aware of, but it's confusing and rather silly. I've seen something like this before and it had the unfortunate result of obscuring one article from view.
  2. Funny, I got different results. It doesn't matter though. If you feel so strongly about the subject, feel free to change the titles.
Poliocretes (talk) 08:19, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I don't feel "so strongly", as I said above "I don't have a problem". But I do think that WP:TITLE and WP:COMMONNAME should be applied. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:26, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Six-Day War

[edit]

As you the one that reverted Dailycare in the first place you opinion on this matter is important.--Shrike (talk) 06:29, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Regarding your recent edit to the article [4], I would appreciate if you checked the cited source before deleting comments based on your own opinion of the topic. The cited source (see the last paragraph of page 242 [5]) clearly states that Israel initiated aerial clashes over Syrian territory (from 1966 onwards) were a significant factor in the build up of tensions prior to the outbreak of war. Dlv999 (talk) 12:08, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ioudaios

[edit]

Hi again, coincidence :)

Latest revision as of 09:20, 8 March 2012 (edit) (undo)Poliocretes (talk | contribs) (Unreferenced and wrong, Hebrew does enable distinction. Arabic alone is irrelevant)

It's evident the author of the article has tried to put some effort into it, as a polite and friendly request, do you think you could go back and actually edit to improve this rather than just delete? If in ancient Hebrew it is possible to distinguish then add the different terms, help improve the article, thanks. In ictu oculi (talk) 11:48, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I thought I was improving it. The sentence I removed is a demonstrable falsehood. The editor in question obviously has little knowledge of modern Hebrew (note that that's what the sentence is talking about, not ancient Hebrew), not to mention Hebrew academic discourse, where the term יהודאי (Judean) can be found quite often. Poliocretes (talk) 12:39, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, fair enough; it's only my opinion but seeing as the article seems to be reasonably good faith edits as far as one can judge, I still think it better to tag or fix rather than delete. I will add that for you. Thanks In ictu oculi (talk) 13:36, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jerusalem history articles

[edit]

Articles regarding Jerusalem's various historical periods have recently been blanked and turned into redirects. I first noticed this with Jerusalem during the Crusader period and Jerusalem during the Mamluk period. I restored the first article and added a request for assessment, but have not done anything with the others. Although these articles appear to be quick machine translations from Hebrew Wikipedia, the articles themselves are noteworthy and the information is not covered elsewhere on the English Wikipedia. If you are a member of any Wikiprojects which would specifically cover Jerusalem's history, then perhaps you could post a notice requesting improvements to these articles? There is some good information in them, even if they are not yet good translations. • Astynax talk 06:24, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Polio I'd hoped when Ast brought this here you would not just rashly run off to under the redirects, seems I was mistaken. Please look at the article, really look at it, and tell me how on earth you can ever consider it to be helpful. The sad fact is that these articles have sat virtually unchanged since they were created, they are pretty much unintelligible, and cleanup of them would be incredibly difficult, as evidenced by the fact nobody has done so in the year since. It would be much much easier for someone to start again from scratch, hence the redirect, all you are doing is restoring poor content which is of no use to anyone, and which just makes the project look bad --Jac16888 Talk 16:06, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Jac, thanks for writing. I am perfectly aware of just how bad the articles are. It was I, Astynax and several others who took this and transformed it into Jerusalem during the Second Temple Period. Same story, different article. It took us a bit of time and quite a bit of effort, but the result is a proper article. There's no reason that process can't be repeated. Besides, as poor as they are, the redirects pointed at articles that offered very little to the specific subjects at hand and require serious attention themselves. I still think it best to leave bad content over none at all. Although I have little time for editing these days, I will do my best to put some effort into these articles. Poliocretes (talk) 16:45, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree, in it's current state the article is of no use to anyone. If you're willing to work on it, then fine, there is no reason it cannot remain a redirect until you can create a proper article, or else work on it in your userspace--Jac16888 Talk 16:49, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Photos from Battle of Zahle

[edit]

Hey, you removed these two photos (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Syrian_Gazelle.jpg , http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Syrian_MIGs_flying_over_Zahle.jpg) stating they are photoshopped/wrongly attributed. I am not an expert at identifying the origin or nature of these planes, but I took them from a book that says they were used by the Syrian Army and these photos are property of the author of this book, so I do not believe they are photoshopped. Can you look into this ?

Thanks. J10452M (talk) 07:32, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can it be that the gazelle is Serbian made but it was used by the Syrian army ? Same goes for the Migs. I know it's a long shot but i want to consider all the possibilities. Regarding the source, it is good because all the other photos are from it and they are correct. Thanks for your cooperation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by J10452M (talk • contribs) 05:44, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I guess you're right. Thanks for pointing this out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by J10452M (talk • contribs) 09:22, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit summary at Six-Day War

[edit]

I don't claim to own any article, thank you. I'm just trying to help a new editor. --Frederico1234 (talk) 10:05, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Use his talk page then. When someone takes the time and invests the effort in editing, I can't think of anything more dispiriting that to see his edits reverted simply because they are too large or somehow unclear. Poliocretes (talk) 10:30, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You might be right about using user talk pages instead of doing direct revert. Your edit summary could have been less rude though. I'm also investing significant time reviewing people's edits. --Frederico1234 (talk) 15:32, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to workshops on editing Wikipedia

[edit]

Dear Poliocretes,

We are a team of researchers at the University of Oxford and AU Sharjah, researching the experiences of editors of content about the Arab world on Wikipedia. We are interested in your experiences of editing Wikipedia and are organising two events that we think you would be an excellent contributor to.

First, we are hosting an online wiki focus group about contributing to Wikipedia in Arabic and to articles about the Middle East and North Africa. We are interested in what barriers you perceive to exist in Wikipedia, how articles can be made better and generally what can be done to expand and improve Arabic Wikipedia and Wikipedia articles about the Arab world. This discussion will take place on a MediaWiki hosted at our institution and be available in English and Arabic. We will allow users to create their own discussion pages in addition to our discussions.

Second, we are hosting face-to-face workshops in Cairo from 21st-22nd October 2012. If you are interested in this we should be able to pay travel and accommodation costs for up to twenty participants. This workshop will cover similar themes to the online discussion but will allow participants to meet one another and benefit from being together.

We will take care of the organization and planning and all you have to do is show up and be ready to discuss. But if you would like to help shape some of the discussion themes in advance, please let us know. We have booked time in the workshops for Wikipedian-led discussions.

More details can be found by expanding our “Frequently Asked Questions” below.

We would be delighted to welcome you to either (or both) event. Please let us know (wikiproject@oii.ox.ac.uk) if you would like the opportunity to participate and we can send you more details.

Sincerely,

Mark, Bernie, Ilhem, Ali, Ahmed, and Heather

Dr. Mark Graham, Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford; Dr. Bernie Hogan, Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford; Dr. Ilhem Allagui, Department of Mass Communication, American University of Sharjah; Dr. Ali Frihida, National Engineering School of Tunis; Heather Ford, Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford; Ahmed Medhat, Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford;

OIIOxford (talk) 11:07, 21 August 2012 (UTC), tidied 10:47, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Military history coordinator election

[edit]

The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 09:42, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Your claim?

[edit]

I removed nothing. I added a support. That was my only action. I am not in the buisiness of removing things from talk pages. Especially other editors. When I added my support there was only user, brown haired girls contribution, there. There may have been an edit conflict of some sort BUT I DO NOT remove other contributions. I hope you are assuming good faith here. Irondome (talk) 19:54, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • I went straight from a notifying email of changes, using the link to the page and made my comment from there. That may have a bearing as it said it was an old page and the type changed colour to a pink. That may explain it as being a technical issue I was not aware of. Your contribution was not there. Or perhaps more accurately, not visible to me when I went to the page from the email link.

I certainly never have and never would remove ANY other editor input, of any sort on a talk page. Im experienced enough to know that. Irondome (talk) 20:12, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

HaHoma ...

[edit]

Hey Poliocretes, you reverted my recent edit to Jerusalem during the Second Temple Period. The name in Hebrew, per se, was not what was important to me. I was trying to provide a wikilink for various mentions of "the Third Wall" (HaHoma HaShlishit) in other Wikipedia articles. I ran into a problem when using the hash (#) to link directly to the appropriate second level section in "Jerusalem during the Second Temple Period". Second level sections titled "Urban landscape" are used five times in the "Jerusalem during the Second Temple Period" article. I was trying to link to the fifth use of the subsection, "Urban landscape" under "Roman Prefects, Procurators, and the Destruction of the Temple". I was unsuccessful. My wikilinks kept going to the first subsection labeled "Urban landscape".
Apart from telling me to create a new article about "The Third Wall", can you suggest a solution to my linking problem? Kind regards, --@Efrat (talk) 13:17, 4 November 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, Poliocretes. You have new messages at Atefrat's talk page.
Message added 13:02, 04 November 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]
Hello, Poliocretes. You have new messages at Atefrat's talk page.
Message added 17:53, 04 November 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

do not understand your edit summary

[edit]

[6]--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 18:59, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Palestine-Israel enforcement restriction

[edit]

As a result of an arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee has acknowledged long-term and persistent problems in the editing of articles related to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, broadly understood. As a result, the Committee has enacted broad editing restrictions, described here and below.

  • Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process.
  • The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics; restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project.
  • Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning with a link to this decision; and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines.
  • Discretionary sanctions imposed under the provisions of this decision may be appealed to the imposing administrator, the appropriate administrators' noticeboard (currently WP:AE), or the Committee.

These editing restrictions may be applied to any editor for cause, provided the editor has been previously informed of the case. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions.

Generally, the next step, if an administrator feels your conduct on pages in this topic area is disruptive, would be a warning, to be followed by the imposition of sanctions (although in cases of serious disruption, the warning may be omitted). Hopefully no such action will be necessary.

This notice is only effective if given by an uninvolved administrator and logged here.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:30, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I need your edit

[edit]

Could you please help me here? Thanks--24.232.216.190 (talk) 00:18, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please...

[edit]

Thanks for all the corrections to An-Nekhel Fortress. I think they were all me. - but please could we keep Sharon's rank? Padres Hana (talk) 18:55, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done, though its previous use was somewhat imprecise. Poliocretes (talk) 10:38, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gezer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tiglat-Pileser (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deputy leaders of the thirty-third Israeli government

[edit]

Could you help me with this? I don't know who are the current Head of the Government Deputies.--Michael Zeev (talk) 03:56, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Neither do I; according to Hebrew wiki, there aren't any. Poliocretes (talk) 10:35, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Upper Zohar

[edit]

Alex ShihTalk 00:18, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Upper Zohar

[edit]

You have new message/s Hello. You have new messages at Talk:Upper Zohar's talk page. הסרפד (call me Hasirpad) 01:26, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

[edit]

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill [talk] 17:57, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

IDF F-16s losses to combat

[edit]

There are a few links on the Mig-23 page that state that there were three Israeli Air Force F-16s shot down in three days in 1982. Is there a way that this can be validated? Articseahorse (talk) 22:24, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not really. These Russian sources are notoriously untrustworthy, but we have little with which to either corroborate or discount them. There's little we can do except cite sources that provide different accounts. Poliocretes (talk) 14:15, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Someone recently put up a refference that they claim is a Israel report that confirms the Mig-23 was able to claim airel victories over IDF aircraft. I tried to look it up and found nothing. Here is the reference. "לבטאון חיל-האוויר הישראלי", Jule 1984, №141, pp.12

Articseahorse (talk) 14:37, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

[edit]

You've reverted two of my edits, without even bothering to leave an edit summary, making it awfully hard to assume good faith. Any reason why I should not revert? Poliocretes (talk) 18:52, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Poliocretes,
there are 2 good reasons :
1. WP:1RR
2. In Israel, 20 % of the population are Arab Israelis and nearly all the remaining are Jewish Israelis. It is therefore legitime to point out that the Israeli settlers in the occupied territories do not fall in the 1st category but only in the 2nd one. By the way, Trahelliven should find sources for this edit (which is neverthless obvious).
Pluto2012 (talk) 19:16, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Poliocretes,
You may be blocked for this if somebody complains : [7] given this article is under WP:1RR.
That would be much better to find a sentence pointing the fact that Israeli settlements in the occupied territories are mainly (if not totally) populated by Jewish Israelis (after checking the information is notorious and of course after sourcing this).
Pluto2012 (talk) 08:48, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Well. That's not perfect but that is a "start" : [8]. Pluto2012 (talk) 08:56, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If you wish to complain, go ahead, complain. I don't do threats, and I don't waste my time on wikilawyers. If you wish to find a sentence "pointing the fact that Israeli settlements in the occupied territories are mainly (if not totally) populated by Jewish Israelis" then you or Trahelliven go ahead and do that. For one so fond of certain policy, you seem oblivious to other aspects of it. "The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material". Finally, FYI, WP:1RR does not apply to vandalism, which as you did not deign to leave an edit summary, is precisely what your edits yesterday were. Poliocretes (talk) 09:03, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Israeli settlements - Jewish civilian communities

[edit]

We could go on reverting forever. How about:-

Following Israel's capture of these territories, Israeli settlements (Jewish civilian communities) were established within each of them.

Jewish civilian communities is the expression used in the lead of the article on Israeli settlements. Trahelliven (talk) 10:04, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I utterly fail to understand why you insist on inserting Judaism into the equation. The illegality of Israeli settlements in the territories captured in 1967 has nothing to do with the religious identity of the settlers, but with the fact that the state of Israel is not recognized as having a valid claim to these lands. Furthermore, not all settlers are Jewish, and the vast majority of them are in fact secular. It's an irrelevant label that can have no purpose other than race-baiting. Poliocretes (talk) 10:13, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have opened up discussion on the talk page on Israel. Trahelliven (talk) 17:41, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Compliment

[edit]

Good catch. Debresser (talk) 19:48, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :-) Poliocretes (talk) 20:13, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Israeli Navy

[edit]

Thanks for the clarification, and for your good faith edit to the Operation Full Disclosure article, as it pertains to the Israeli Navy. I did not know they were part of the IDF. I love Israel, and the more I learn about her, the better. Juneau Mike (talk) 02:11, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Michael, great to see another editor contributing to Israel related article. I love her too :-) Poliocretes (talk) 08:52, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I thought this article/editorial might interest you. While the writers sources aren't cited, (and I haven't cited it in the OFD article for that reason) a lot of great information was given. I can imagine cheers going up in the room when the commanders heard that radio traffic! This was a stunning victory for Israel! http://www.israelhayom.com/site/newsletter_article.php?id=15963 Juneau Mike (talk) 17:52, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see a problem citing it, it's no worse from any other newspaper article covering the subject. Israel Hayom is a pretty awful paper imho, but this specific one isn't bad. Poliocretes (talk) 18:47, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

KLOS C

[edit]

I very recently joined WikiProject Israel, because it is a subject I love and one I am very interested in. I noticed someone created a page for the KLOS C, the ship in the Operation Full Disclosure affair, which was well intended but was a bit of a mini-mess. It was exactly one sentence, no categories, etc. I built it up some, but it needs to be fleshed out more, and I would love to collaborate with you on it. Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thanks. Juneau Mike (talk) 21:28, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Mike, i'll take a look, though I'm a very lightweight editor these days. Don't have much time for more than a touch here and there. Poliocretes (talk) 08:25, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Aristobulus II

[edit]

I wanted to make an article more in line with elsewhere sources information, and you removed said sources information. This is rather vandalistic, please seize at once. 83.128.72.82 (talk) 18:15, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think you mean "cease". Anyway, I'm sorry you feel this way, since while making the Jerusalem siege article (which I wrote, by the way, so I do have an idea of the subject matter) "more in line" with other articles, you were not fixing anything but in fact spreading mistakes from one article to another. See, what the article about Aristobulus said about Mark Antony is utter nonsense. I know this because I do in fact posses a copy of Plutarch's Nine Lives and I edited the Aristobulus II article after consulting it. Mark Antony arrived in the east in 57BC. Even the Mark Antony article says so: "In 57 BC, Antony joined the military staff of Aulus Gabinius, the Proconsul of Syria, as chief of the cavalry. The appointment marks the beginning of his military career." That's six years after Pompey's campaign. Feel free to take some time to read about Mark Antony and his career, the web is full of sources, but when you're done please revert your recent changes which, while certainly not "vandalistic", are simply dead wrong. I'm sure you meant the best, but now instead of one bad article, we have two. Poliocretes (talk) 18:35, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Sorry for overreacting and thanks for being so polite. I actually read a version of the work Plutarch, but it actually confirms this, perhaps it is different from yours? But removing it raises the question of how much resistance Pompey encountered, as the Hasmoneans were quite powerfull to say the least, even when fighting internally. Also the Dutch wikipedia says this aswell, and I work there a lot. Perhaps it is a consistenty from the ancient authors? 83.128.72.82 (talk) 18:46, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What Dutch Wikipedia says is immaterial, Wikipedia is not a WP:RS and certainly can't be used to reference itself. I don't know what Plutarch you're reading, but you've got it wrong. Here's what Plutarch says abuout Mark Anthony: "After he had remained there some time. Gabinius, proconsul, going into Syria, persuaded him to go with him; Antonius told him he would not go as a private man: wherefore Gabinius gave him charge of his horsemen, and so took him with him. So, first of all he sent him against Aristobulus, who had made the Jews to rebel, and was the first man himself that got up to the wall of a castle of his, and so drove Aristobulus out of all his holds: and with those few men he had with him, he overcame all the Jews in set battle, which were many against one, and put all of them almost to the sword ; and furthermore, took Aristobulus himself prisoner with his son." (Plutarch, The Life of Marcus Antonius. This has nothing to do with Pompey's campaign, Gabinius was in Syria in 57BC. Please revert your edits. Poliocretes (talk) 07:12, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

[edit]

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:07, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mossad LeAliyah Bet

[edit]

In Hebrew it is מוֹסָד לַעֲלִיָּה בֵּי"ת, so the transcription should be Mossad LaAliyyah Bet. La,not Le. Thank you. רפי מוזס (talk) 14:55, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!

[edit]

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Voting for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year now open!

[edit]

Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators, TomStar81

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A Thankful Kitten for you!

[edit]

I've had lengthy Conflict conversations with Ocean in the past and I wasn't looking forward to another. Also, fun-fact: This is how the kittens look around the place we stay at for the Kabri excavation.

Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie | Say Shalom! 1 Tevet 5775 16:53, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, great work on the Kabri article. I love it when archaeology articles get the attention they deserve :-) Poliocretes (talk) 08:46, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! You and me both, but Kabri's a place near and dear to my heart, so the least I can do is give it a good Wikipedia article. Hopefully one day I can get it to GA-status (just need to make it so that people with no archaeological background can follow it). Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie | Say Shalom! 2 Tevet 5775 15:38, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tariq Fadel in "Israel Defense Forces"

[edit]

Hi. Could you report this guy? He broke 1RR several times for pure POV vandalism. He was warned, but continues with his actions. I think some kind of blockade is needed here. Thanks.--Averysoda (talk) 02:14, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, Averysoda, I don't do that kind of stuff. Don't like wikilawyering. Perseverance wins the day. Poliocretes (talk) 06:04, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 2 August

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

[edit]

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Suggesting Move of Category

[edit]

Shalom. I would like to suggest that you move the current category, "Ancient Jewish settlements of Judaea" by making it into a "sub-category" under the parent category, "Ancient Jewish history." I would do this myself, but I'm unfamiliar with the process. Thanks.Davidbena (talk) 12:27, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, Done. Categorization is pretty easy, check out Wikipedia:HotCat. Poliocretes (talk) 13:17, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks.Davidbena (talk) 14:18, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

[edit]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!--Makeandtoss (talk) 18:40, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of RfC on Eagles of Death Metal at Content Resolution Noticeboard

[edit]

Greetings,

A discussion of the content dispute about content proposed for the Eagles of Death Metal article, in which you are involved (and named in the RfC) has been opened at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Talk:Eagles_of_Death_Metal.23Threats_to_bataclan_wording.

You are invited to participate in this discussion.

Thank you, and all the best.

Ronreisman (talk) 18:44, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject historian and newcomer of the year awards now open!

[edit]

On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Airfield or airfield

[edit]

The standard is for airfield to be capitalised. See Bayug Airfield, Bernam River Airfield and Daly Waters Airfield for some examples. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:13, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alexandrium, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scythopolis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

[edit]

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite

[edit]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 02:16, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Amikam Norkin

[edit]

Hello, Poliocretes. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Amikam Norkin, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Amikam Norkin to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Tiven gonsalves 09:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Ways to improve Amikam Norkin

[edit]

Hi, I'm Tiven2240. Poliocretes, thanks for creating Amikam Norkin!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add more sources for the article

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Tiven gonsalves 10:03, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Poliocretes. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the Military history WikiProject Historian and Newcomer of the Year is ending soon!

[edit]
 

Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.

Sgt. Azaria

[edit]

Channel 2 ,Galatz, and Channel 10 report that. the Witness is the person who shot the driver himself. The Sposkman and commanders had to answer and try to defend against that statement (that is not a minor thing) 5.144.59.157 (talk) 20:42, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have re added the information now there is another soldier who said he hesitated because of the Azaria case 5.144.59.157 (talk) 22:25, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tel Dan Stele

[edit]

Thanks for giving your input on the Tel Dan Stele talk page. Would you mind contributing to the discussion on sources? There is currently a clear consensus, in my estimation, for the new sources however it would be great to get more voices. Thank you Drsmoo (talk) 03:53, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pov-push?

[edit]

This is a battlefield mentality. It's significant that nothing in the lead could be found about it when I immediately found reliable sources to it. Immediately assuming bad faith and starting with an accusation is pointless. What makes it OR? That word "legal" was mine but in that case a simple removal of that would have sufficed. The sources literally state that some of the most notable state actors called Tel Aviv the capital and that no country accepts Jerusalem as the capital. I'm not debating that, I changed it because the sources already said so. Bataaf van Oranje (Prinsgezinde) (talk) 20:39, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March Madness 2017

[edit]

G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:

  • tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
  • updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
  • creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Christianity

[edit]

Thanks for restoring that passage at Archaeology of Israel. I examined each section before adding it to the lead, and none fitted the bill. I thought, and still do, that the passage should go in the lead, since it is a generic fact related to the whole time frame covered by Israeli archaeology. If one puts it into the Byzantine section, implicitly, 4 centuries of Christian life in Palestine are cut out, and the Christian material is limited to 390-634, excluding also finds from the post-Byzantine period, whereas a Christian majority seems to have held up until the Crusaders destroyed it in the 11th century. That's the technical problem that led me to plunking it in the lead. Regards Nishidani (talk) 15:03, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. While notable, in the lead your addition was merely an isolated factoid devoid any context. Why suddenly bring up Christianity when Judaism, Islam and countless other cultures are absent? The article is clearly lacking in many respects, but at its present state, the Byzantine section fits best. While Christianity is clearly present earlier, I'll remind you that this is an article about archaeology. Christianity appears far (FAR) more predominantly in the Byzantine archeological record than it does earlier. As for later periods, they are altogether absent for no apparent reason. That needs fixing regardless of the current issue. Poliocretes (talk) 17:46, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Well, we can agree to disagree, fine. But it is not a factoid, surely. A third of all archaeological material excavated, per annum, being from one specific cultural domain is a significant piece of information, though it would be better contextualized by a statistical breakdown of the other components. In any case, it is no big issue: I was appalled by its straight removal, and appreciated your rational decision to find some place for it. Thanks Nishidani (talk) 20:39, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hamas and human rights in Israel (plus other)

[edit]

Hi. Do you think this is the right thing to do? (apparently it was done without discussion or wider consensus, based on an alleged template three years ago). It seems a covert attempt to hide criticism by a clear POV warrior. If it is the right move, at least could you add an internal link for criticism of Hamas in the article about the organization? In addition, the reason why I suspect of this user is, among other things, because he changed the lead in a clear POV manner, or adds tags, other meaningless tags and POV content ("fired from his job as king of Israel in 1982" lol!) and more tags, but when it comes to human rights in Israel, he adds a strange unrelated random cherry-picking quote by Netanyahu and the sentence "Most Palestinians in Israel live under Israeli occupation and they are not allowed to vote", which is false since Palestinians in Israel are Israeli citizens with full equal rights, while Palestinians in the West Bank vote for the Palestinian Authority elections. Could you add the fact that Israeli Arabs vote in Israel and "Palestinians living under Israeli occupation" DO vote in Palestinian elections? Thanks--Yuniab (talk) 20:31, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The user in question in undoubtedly a POV warrior, but moving a big chunk of text into a separate article, which is currently properly linked to, is by itself no big deal IMHO. Poliocretes (talk) 06:55, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template reverts

[edit]

I do not understand your revert of my edits on Template:Campaignbox Six-Day War. The item I added has to do with events that occurred during the war. How can you say it doesn't? The first line of the article itself even says "The Reunification of Jerusalem refers to the June, 1967 reunification of Jerusalem following the conquest of half of the city". When exactly do you think this conquest happened if not during the war? - GalatzTalk 14:11, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's very simple really, that article has very little to do with the Six Day War, which is what the campaignbox template is about. It doesn't talk about Armon HaNatziv, Ammunition Hill, the Lions' Gate or fighting on the Augusta Victoria ridge. It's about the political act of reunification, the aftermath of the war, about the difference before and after, not about the conduct of the war. It doesn't belong in the template. It's not called campaignbox for nothing. Also, it's a badly written article, no more than a collection of barely related issues WP:SYNTH-ed together, but that's another matter. Poliocretes (talk) 20:17, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
While I do agree the article needs work, I don't agree that it is unrelated to the fighting. It doesn't discuss the individual battles that occurred, but more so the cumulative battle results as a whole relating to the fighting of June 7 1967. The article obviously covers the aftermath, but the fighting itself is the basis of the article. Rather than arguing about this, I will first work on updating the article, and I think after I work on it, you will agree it belongs in the box. - GalatzTalk 20:33, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request - Picture in Golan during Six-Day War

[edit]

Talk:Six-Day War#Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 11 June 2017--181.93.231.10 (talk) 21:04, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

POV changes not supported by sources in Quds Day + Hassan Salama

[edit]

Hello. User SpidErxD made a series of changes (without previous discussion) which are not supported by given sources. For example, he replaced "oppose Zionism and Israel's existence" for "Zionist Regime's existence" (later changed by Nableezy for simply "oppose Zionism and Israel") despite the BBC clearly says:

"The idea behind Jerusalem Day rallies was to gather all fasting Muslims every year on the last Friday of Ramadan to show their opposition to the existence of Israel."

Another example. He changed the original "voicing anti-Semitic attacks" for "anti-zionist attacks" despite Katajun Amirpur says:

"One could easily come to the conclusion that anti-Semitism and a hostile attitude towards Jews are deeply rooted in Iranian society."

Later he made a series of changes to assert the fact that only "Zionist organizations" protest against Quds Day, which is not the case. Many Jewish and non-Jewish organizations and politicians expressed their rejection as well. Would you mind taking a look at those recent changes? Also you may want to take a look at this strange POV redaction. Thanks.--181.110.134.245 (talk) 01:39, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, once or twice is OK, but I'm not some wish fairy. Please don't leave edit requests on my talk page. Poliocretes (talk) 05:12, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
FYI this is an IP sock of AndresHerutJaim. nableezy - 18:33, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Israel Defense Forces

[edit]

This is clear duplicated. Could you please remove it?--181.93.231.83 (talk) 03:42, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request

[edit]

Please take a look at Talk:Israel Defense Forces#Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 30 July 2017. Thanks.--186.153.52.240 (talk) 01:46, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

POV warrior in 2014 Gaza conflict

[edit]

Hi. Don't you think words such as "unilaterally and illegally" or "are regularly killed by Israeli forces" should be removed? Is there a way to make the text a little bit more neutral? (also he wants to change the title for the POV "invasion")--186.125.225.60 (talk) 20:27, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election

[edit]

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IDF - Repeated information, excessive images

[edit]

That user is pretty annoying. Could you please revert this duplicated information? Thanks--186.125.81.80 (talk) 03:44, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IDF - vandalism

[edit]

Could you please revert this WP:terrorist POV warrior? Thanks--Mariolis MG (talk) 19:13, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Poliocretes. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Military Historian of the Year and Newcomer of the Year nominations and voting

[edit]

As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User group for Military Historians

[edit]

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018 Milhist Backlog Drive

[edit]

G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:

  • tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
  • adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
  • updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
  • creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.

For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request for comment of Israeli neighborhoods

[edit]

I have opened an RFC for several of the Israeli cities that I think are un-encyclopedic. You were listed as being a participant of WikiProject Israel. Therefore, I appreciate input from you at that RFC. Thank you. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 14:28, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

[edit]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

[edit]

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

[edit]

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused.[reply]

Have your say!

[edit]

Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jaffa Gate

[edit]

I agree it doesn’t look like any picture I’ve seen. But the caption says David’s Tower and the date 1920 was around the time they demolished the Ottoman clock tower so I thought it was possibly authentic.

Jaffa Gate 1920

. Padres Hana (talk) 21:41, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake. Thanks for correcting. Padres Hana (talk) 18:06, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It's a good photo, saw you added it to the Tower of David article. Poliocretes (talk) 07:01, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

[edit]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:06, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

[edit]

G'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:18, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago

[edit]
Awesome
Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:47, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject Newcomer and Historian of the Year awards now open

[edit]

G'day all, the nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject newcomer and Historian of the Year are open, all editors are encouraged to nominate candidates for the awards before until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2020, after which voting will occur for 14 days. There is not much time left to nominate worthy recipients, so get to it! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" closing

[edit]

G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:35, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

[edit]

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:26, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

[edit]

Hi Poliocretes,

I just wanted to drop a quick note saying thank you for filling out my survey! I really appreciate it, and seeing what a prolific contributor you are, your opinion is very valued.

All the best,

Sarabnas (talk) 10:17, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict...please fill out my survey?

[edit]

Hello :) I am writing my MA dissertation on Wikipedia Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict, and I noticed that you have contributed to those pages. My dissertation will look at the process of collaborative knowledge production on the Israel-Palestine conflict, and the effect it has on bias in the articles. This will involve understanding the profiles and motivations of editors, contention/controversy and dispute resolution in the talk pages, and bias in the final article.

For more information, you can check out my meta-wiki research page or my user page, where I will be posting my findings when I am done.

I would greatly appreciate if you could take 5 minutes to fill out this quick survey before 8 August 2021.

Participation in this survey is entirely voluntary and anonymous. There are no foreseeable risks nor benefits to you associated with this project.

Thanks so much,

Sarah Sanbar

Sarabnas I'm researching Wikipedia Questions? 20:58, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

[edit]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:59, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nomination period closing soon

[edit]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election voting has commenced

[edit]

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:40, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting period closing soon

[edit]

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh man, I invite you to liberate in the articles of Ptolemaic Egypt, Egypt in the era of the Ptolemies, can you?

[edit]

Oh man, I invite you to liberate in the articles of Ptolemaic Egypt, Egypt in the era of the Ptolemies, can you? Basalcurry (talk) 19:33, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, according to Shlomo Alon, 7 bases were damaged, but none were destroyed

[edit]

Sir, according to Shlomo Alon, 7 bases were damaged, but none were destroyed Truthleaps (talk) 12:56, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK, what does that have to do with your insistence to delete the paragraph already in place? You want to add that, add it. Poliocretes (talk) 13:14, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Answer EP.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Answer EP.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please in connection with the Battle of Green Island Plumus 6 admit that they incurred 38 fatalities. Among the chatet 13 unit of 40 people on the green island of Blomus 6 for confessions on the channel of the Hudson Union Society

[edit]

Please in connection with the Battle of Green Island Plumus 6 admit that they incurred 38 fatalities. Among the chatet 13 unit of 40 people on the green island of Blomus 6 for confessions on the channel of the Hudson Union Society Mainebagy (talk) 20:56, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

hudson union society

[edit]

hudson union society Mainebagy (talk) 20:56, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ami Ayalon , former Head of Israel's Secret Service Talks About Operation Bulmus 6

[edit]

Ami Ayalon , former Head of Israel's Secret Service Talks About Operation Bulmus 6 Mainebagy (talk) 20:58, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Channel on YouTube. hudson union society

[edit]

Channel on YouTube. hudson union society Mainebagy (talk) 20:59, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiEagle - January 2022

[edit]
The WikiEagle
The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter
Volume I — Issue 1
Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle
Announcements
  • After over a decade of silence, the WikiProject Aviation newsletter is making a comeback under the name The WikiEagle. This first issue was sent to all active members of the project and its sub-projects. If you wish to continue receiving The WikiEagle, you can add your username to the mailing list. For now the newsletter only covers general project news and is run by only one editor. If you wish to help or to become a columnist, please let us know. If you have an idea which you believe would improve the newsletter, please share it; suggestions are welcome and encouraged.
  • On 16 December, an RfC was closed which determined theaerodrome.com to be an unreliable source. The website, which is cited over 1,500 articles, mainly on WWI aviation, as of the publishing of this issue.
  • Luft46.com has been added to the list of problematic sources after this discussion.
  • The Jim Lovell article was promoted to Featured Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Hawkeye7.
  • The Raymond Hesselyn article was promoted to Good Article status on 4 December after being nominated by Zawed.
  • The Supermarine Sea King article was promoted to Good Article status on 22 December after being nominated by Amitchell125.
  • The William Hodgson (RAF officer) article was promoted to Good Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Zawed.
Members

New Members

Number of active members: 386. Total number of members: 921.

Closed Discussions

Featured Article assessment

Good Article assessment

Deletion

Requested moves

Article Statistics
This data reflects values from DMY.
Aviation pages by quality
Quality
Total
FA 142
FL 15
A 56
GA 505
B 4,573
C 11,878
Start 15,082
Stub 18,754
List 2,539
Category 11,638
Disambig 653
File 2,713
Portal 629
Project 89
Redirect 1,518
Template 2,489
NA 66
Assessed 73,339
Unassessed 1
Total 73,340
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 251,899 Ω = 4.92
New/Ongoing Discussions

On The Main Page

Did you know...

Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagle at The WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the mailing list.
Newsletter contributor: ZLEA

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This number is greatly exaggerated. General Le Pen, Le Pen, estimates Egypt's losses in the air strike for the first 5 planes only, even in his book of an attack that restored security to Egypt, but you only want the highest losses, forgetting your role and ignoring your role. Veteran historians supported the Egyptian figure, including historians of Israel, such as General Danny. Asher and Easter by Le Pen

[edit]

This number is greatly exaggerated. General Le Pen, Le Pen, estimates Egypt's losses in the air strike for the first 5 planes only, even in his book of an attack that restored security to Egypt, but you only want the highest losses, forgetting your role and ignoring your role. Veteran historians supported the Egyptian figure, including historians of Israel, such as General Danny. Asher and Easter by Le Pen Ever ground (talk) 12:03, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, General Passover from Israeli Luban Ever ground (talk) 12:04, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If we were really pretending to be neutral, I would advise you to read the book, General, Passover from Le Pen, for the attack that restored security to Egypt. This book is available on the websites of Israel. Ever ground (talk) 12:11, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations opening soon

[edit]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:52, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting opening soon!

[edit]

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:27, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Correction to previous election announcement

[edit]

Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:41, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting closing soon

[edit]

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Giora Romm

[edit]

On 14 August 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Giora Romm, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:37, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

[edit]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Biased editing of wiki, re:Irgun

[edit]

I saw you deleted a significant portion of the Irgun wiki, why was this done? I can clearly see that the link to the information was valid and Irgun was in fact a terrorist organization. You had deleted mention of that though in order to make it seem like it was not. Why? 71.84.174.123 (talk) 23:02, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Our respective opinions about the Irgun matter little. Hamas isn't labelled as such either. See WP:Terrorist. 10:03, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bat Squadron Israel.gif

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bat Squadron Israel.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:09, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:First Jet Squadron Israel.gif

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:First Jet Squadron Israel.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:20, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023 is now open!

[edit]

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Israel Air Force 201 squadron.gif

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Israel Air Force 201 squadron.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for coordinators is now open!

[edit]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:41, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open!

[edit]

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote here by 23:59 UTC on 29 September! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military history newcomer of the year and military historian of the year

[edit]

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Nominations are open here and here respectively. The nomination period closes at 23:59 on 30 November 2024 when voting begins. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:21, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Poliocretes&oldid=1258275084"