User talk:Wikipedius Reparo

Sock block

I've blocked you indefinitely as a sock of user:Histopher Critchens. Please complain here (or, less convincingly, there) William M. Connolley (talk) 19:59, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikipedius Reparo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

You look so much like the same user that I can't justify unblocking you. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:54, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am not a "sock" of anyone. I see that this false allegation has been made here as well. This is uncalled for and I request to be unblocked.

Please see this: [1]. I reported this IP address after noticing the odd behavior on [2] wherein multiple IP addresses were coming in and each edit warring on the page, going against (in total) users Histopher Critchens, Fram, AlasdairGreen27, and Jeff5102. I could probably have also reported diffs like this one [3] but felt it sufficient at the time to report the three main recent addresses.

Again, I am not a "sock" of Histopher Critchens or anyone else and I request to have my account unblocked. Thank you.

Regarding [4]: some of us are perfectly capable of reading [5] and filing a report, thank you very much. Just because I may be new doesn't make me an idiot.

Botched block review of Histopher Critchens and Wikipedius Reparo

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Wikipedius Reparo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please provide a reason as to why you should be unblocked.
Change {{unblock}} to {{unblock | reason=your reason here ~~~~}}

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=original unblock reason |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Please see this comment:

Again, I am not Wikipedius Reparo. Wikipedius Reparo is not me. The claim that my "contribs are suspicious" is absurd -- back this up with one single example, rather than tossing around unsupported allegations. Please unblock Wikipedius Reparo's account. I can understand honest mistakes, but this is becoming ridiculous -- I'll file a complaint against the offending admins unless you all clean this up quickly. Histopher Critchens (talk) 15:45, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Histopher Critchens (talk) 15:48, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]