User talk:190.163.3.204

October 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Pierre Laval, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. pluma Ø 02:46, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pierre Laval. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. pluma Ø 02:49, 25 October 2011 (UTC) -

Fuck off. In no fucking way at all was that edit vandalism, and if you think it was, then you have a fucking lot to learn about what vandalism is and what vandalism isn't. How dare you stick such an obnoxious template here? 190.163.3.204 (talk) 02:51, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

I blocked and then unblocked you. I can see why you would be upset, but you really can't leave a string of messages and edit summaries like this. Even if you're correct, you weaken your argument by resorting to such nasty attacks. Wknight94 ^talk 03:14, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

There seemed to be no other way to get through to User:Fltyingpig. What am I supposed to do if I'm accused absurdly of vandalism and then all of my attempts to seek an explanation are reverted? Are you leaving any advice for User:Fltyingpig or are you simply assuming that someone with a username is automatically more worthy than someone editing from an IP? What just happened to me was ridiculous and completely unacceptable. 190.163.3.204 (talk) 03:16, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

---