User talk:2601:196:180:8D80:A9F1:E6B0:852F:B49E

March 2023

Hi 2601:196:180:8D80:A9F1:E6B0:852F:B49E! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Operation Elster several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Operation Elster, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300 (talk) 14:51, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is a tempest in a tea pot involving two brand new users overreaching on new changes patrol. One with just 300 edits in a few days experience with the encyclopedia, the other similarly with 500. All they know is revert. And seem determined to ignore edit summaries. Or make the slightest effort to either check the validity of some thing, or if that is too hard, use a citation needed template to flag material they’re questioning, rather than practice completely unacceptable mass reverts without indicating what any of their objections are.

In hopes of ending this cycle, I have on my own supplied a citation for the only questionable edit made (which simply made clear the reason the Pretorius mission failed, a fundamental and undisputed fact about it). Thank you for your concerns.2601:196:180:8D80:A9F1:E6B0:852F:B49E (talk) 14:57, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

---