User talk:Another Four Plasmids

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Another Four Plasmids (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I violated no policy. I have directed no harassment toward anyone. Nothing at all. There is no reason here given for this block other than "harassment." I have had no previous action with admin Crum375 ever before. I have done nothing to this person, nor anyone else. I seldom even edit.

I have done nothing listed as harassing behavior under WP:HARASS. Admin wants my pledge to "permanently stop this behavior," but there were no bad acts for me to stop. There is nothing in policy that forbids my actions.

Apparently this person perceives evil motives in me that do not exist. I am considering arbitration. Please lift this block. If "assume good faith" applies anywhere, it applies here.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=<p><p>
<b>I violated no policy.</b> I have directed no harassment toward anyone. Nothing at all. There is no reason here given for this block other than "harassment." I have had no previous action with admin Crum375 ever before. I have done nothing to this person, nor anyone else. I seldom even edit.<p><p>
I have done nothing listed as harassing behavior under WP:HARASS. Admin wants my pledge to "permanently stop this behavior," but there were no bad acts for me to stop. There is nothing in policy that forbids my actions.<p><br>
Apparently this person perceives evil motives in me that do not exist. I am considering arbitration. Please lift this block. If "assume good faith" applies anywhere, it applies here.<p><br> |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=<p><p>
<b>I violated no policy.</b> I have directed no harassment toward anyone. Nothing at all. There is no reason here given for this block other than "harassment." I have had no previous action with admin Crum375 ever before. I have done nothing to this person, nor anyone else. I seldom even edit.<p><p>
I have done nothing listed as harassing behavior under WP:HARASS. Admin wants my pledge to "permanently stop this behavior," but there were no bad acts for me to stop. There is nothing in policy that forbids my actions.<p><br>
Apparently this person perceives evil motives in me that do not exist. I am considering arbitration. Please lift this block. If "assume good faith" applies anywhere, it applies here.<p><br> |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=<p><p>
<b>I violated no policy.</b> I have directed no harassment toward anyone. Nothing at all. There is no reason here given for this block other than "harassment." I have had no previous action with admin Crum375 ever before. I have done nothing to this person, nor anyone else. I seldom even edit.<p><p>
I have done nothing listed as harassing behavior under WP:HARASS. Admin wants my pledge to "permanently stop this behavior," but there were no bad acts for me to stop. There is nothing in policy that forbids my actions.<p><br>
Apparently this person perceives evil motives in me that do not exist. I am considering arbitration. Please lift this block. If "assume good faith" applies anywhere, it applies here.<p><br> |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Block

I have blocked you for harassment. If you post to your talk page pledging you will permanently stop this behavior, I will remove your block. Crum375 (talk) 05:30, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question before acting on the unblock request

Could you explain why you thought it necessary to repeatedly impersonate SlimVirgin by transcluding their userpage over yours, despite repeated requests to stop doing so? If you can explain that adequatesly, and assure that you will NOT do it again... you may be unblocked...--Jayron32.talk.contribs 03:39, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I also tacked the word "Dadaism" to the page, which is a reference to an early 20th Cent. art form. To say I am impersonating or harassing someone is assuming bad faith. Another Four Plasmids (talk)

That's not an answer to Jayron's question. – Luna Santin (talk) 03:53, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't impersonate anyone. I didn't go around passing myself off as a sock of another user. We may never have even edited the same articles for all I know.Another Four Plasmids (talk)

Claiming adherance to a relatively obscure art movement simply to justify transcluding another users page on top of yours is disingenuous at the least. In simplest terms, 90% of other users would not understand this oblique reference, and are likely to be confused by your actions. I still have seen NO assurance that you intend to cease this activity. Point blank: Can you understand why this is wrong, and will you stop if unblocked? --Jayron32.talk.contribs 03:55, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

While I am willing to defer, there is no policy against such transclusion. To say I am even "disingenuous" is an assumption of bad faith. Blocks can only be made based on policy and nothing in WP:HARASS, which was given as justification, describes my actions. Again, I am willing to defer, but I cannot admit to violating policy when no policy covers my action. Another Four Plasmids (talk)