User talk:Eljohnson15
|
October 28, 2007 - September 2, 2010, September 17, 2010 - April 30, 2017 |
Your edits there are way too promotional: we don't lists individual chapters etc. Readers can get that from the website. As for the flags, WP:INFOBOXFLAG. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 16:36, 8 November 2017 (UTC) Hi! I have no problem about the flags. Nevertheless I have to object to the removal of the chapter list. Please take a look at List of social fraternities and sororities. Most have the list in the article as in Phi Sigma Alpha, or the lists even have their own articles for the chapters. If you have an issue with the chapters being listed I suggest you bring it up at the WikiProject Fraternities and Sororities. Regards, El Johnson (talk) 18:36, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Well, can you do it in regular prose with bullets, rather than in a table (which makes for awkward editing) with bold and colors and flags and overlinking? (No one is going to go to the article on New York from that list.) Drmies (talk) 18:48, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Eljohnson15. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Is there a way to have this page semi-protected? It has, for a year, been the target of a recurring troll (who is using IPs and single-purpose accounts) that insists on ignoring that the governing body of the baseball/softball federation (IOC) has recognized sports sovereignty for several decades. This guy is hell bent on the politization of the topic. Furthermore, this guy appears to be a disruptive puppeteer in other pages as well. Here he only got out easy because the IPs had gone stale, but the pattern is still there: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/ANTbook365. 2600:387:9:5:0:0:0:B2 (talk) 09:21, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Eljohnson15. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Discussion
Hi. There is a discussion HERE that I believe will be of interest to you. Mercy11 (talk) 03:18, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
The file File:Cipfri.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
The file File:Beca sigma.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
