User talk:Grapestomper9
 | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Dunkmack9 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:34, 4 October 2013 (UTC) |
talk) 1:43 am, Today (UTC−4) | decline=I'm sorry; while your narrative is expansive it is also entirely unconvincing. — Coren (talk) 15:49, 5 October 2013 (UTC)}}
{{unblock Expansive narrative too explanatory for you, sorry about that, I will try and be more direct. This block violates WP blocking policy, as those who made the block happen were involved in edit war of their beloved biased and factually incorrect articles. It was Binksternet, Trekphiler (likely a sock puppet of Binksternet) Diannaa (sockpuppet of Dianna) and Drmies who should be getting banned for referring to those who add well cited info to their biased one side-laden POV articles as "whack jobs" "extreme conspiracy theory nut cases" "extreme biased kook" "POV moron" etc. As I am unable to convince you people who I am not, I will point out that Dunkmack was blocked 10 months ago. Long block, eh? According to Binksternet, I have used some abrasive language in response to being called a "conspiracy theory nutjob" etc, but have not crossed over the line. In response to his request for more civility I have bent over backwards (in the face of being still continuously caled a "moron nutjob" etc.) to be friendly and unabrasive. The info on Day of Deceit and Rudolph Hess book mentioned in that article give thoroughly misleading info as to what those authors actually said. The people (I will refrain from calling them POV kooks) running those articles need people like me to bring some civility to their articles that are monuments to their inability to allow others to question their entrenched beliefs. And, quite frankly, my interpretation of these events are not considered conspiracy theories. For instance, I believe Hess was relaced with a double sometime after he entered Britain and was in custody. A theory Thomas expanded on in his book Murder of Rudolph Hess, but Diannaa will not conceed. Or Stinnett never said The McCollum Memo was written by him to start a war. So just to sum up so you will not be confused, the block violates WP blocking policy, and I have done nothing (since Dmack's block 10 months ago) to earn a block. I cleaned up my act when requested to do so. Grapestomper9 (talk) 19:32, 6 October 2013 (UTC)}}