User talk:HrZ

	; Archives (Index) ;
	23; 01;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

This is HrZ's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Tip of the moment...

Upgrade Recent Changes in my preferences

Have you tried the Advanced options in your Recent changes user preferences settings? It requires a modern browser to work and is disabled by default.

Unlike the normal "recent changes" page, these options can summarize edits to the same page and let you dynamically expand and collapse the list items. For multiple edits to the same page, it also provides a single "changes" link which will show you a view of the differences (diffs) between these combined edits and the last non-recent revision.

After changing the Advanced options, the "Recent changes" list takes effect immediately and can be reversed by unchecking any option.

Prior tip – Tips library – Next tip

re: barnstar

Thank you very much for the barnstar! Hate to see people vandalise the article of my fave band, and destroy the hardwork that's been put in to get it to a Featured Article. And sorry for the watchlist clogging... ;-) Lugnuts (talk) 11:26, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to see my hardwork thanked. If you've not seen them already, here's some pics I've taken of them. Lugnuts (talk) 13:34, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Yes, the German show was really good. Gave me the travelling bug too! Lugnuts (talk) 10:53, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bullet Boys

you undid my revision of the Bullet Boys article asking if there is a source for the information and yes there, it is written on the thank you credits on the albums sleeve.I was a magazine editor in 1990 and Marq Torien also mentioned it in a Screemer Magazine article.Do you think I was just making it up? I feel it helps the article and is definitely worthy of note. I won't undo it I'll leave it up to you, as it's not that important to me. it was just an interesting fact.Punkinfo (talk) 07:49, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You for your response to my deletion, however I don't remember the date of the Screemer Magazine and apparently they are in the process of archiving their material for the Internet but haven't done so yet. I don't know how to properly source the album sleeve for that content. thank you for your professionalism in this matter. Please do what you feel is proper. As far as a lot of additions and deletions on their article for no apparent reason, I can only imagine it's the work of the only original member vocalist Marq Torien for he is a control freak and is probably policing the information and cutting out anything that rubs him wrong or credits someone else. Good luck and I also noticed that you built Chris Weber's article. I knew him years ago quite a character.Punkinfo (talk) 13:43, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you and yes I will definitely forward you the article if i come across it.Punkinfo (talk) 19:25, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

also BulletBoys

You also undid a BulletBoys edit I made. There is PLENTY of documentation on the Internet for the existence of this album. You can simply go to Amazon to see it for sale. Gringo300 (talk) 04:51, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

reference for Rocked & Ripped

Reference added in Discography. Now, do I need a reference for the album earlier in the article, too? Gringo300 (talk) 18:55, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Heathcote

Dude, I want to start an article on one of Suicidal Tendencies bass players.Bob Heathcote only since he hasn't had an article this whole time his page links to the " List of Suicidal Tendencies Band Members" article.and thats without any pre link in the bars. How can I start an article and change the link to go to his own page? I linked his name so you can see what I mean. If you have any help for me please let me know.Punkinfo (talk) 03:10, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Unified Theory

Hello! Your submission of Unified Theory at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! PM800 (talk) 21:50, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Yeah I know that a lot of these articles I've created/edited these last few months need work due to a lack of reliable, third-party sources. I probably should delete American Hangover considering the fact that it's a bootleg. I'm hoping some day Tanks of Zen will generate enough interest that AH will see a proper release but yes I know that's not what Wiki is for. I was planning to start an article for that band The Crying Spell but I'm aware of Wiki's policy for reliable, third-party sources. That Los Angeles Times article on My Sister's Machine and that Georgia Straight article on Soulbender are probably the only sources I've used for band articles that could qualify as gold. You're not the first person to address me on this matter, and you most likely won't be the last either. Tell me do you know of any editors who actually review each other's work via email or something before they actually post them? Shaneymike (talk) 00:13, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Revolver

Since the Corey Taylor "news" got treated as if it's important I think this rumour is good for keeping fans aware of who's being discussed, it's better than "they may be looking at someone", and this one is about as reliable and definitely more likely than Taylor, so it should stay. MillerCrosses (talk) 22:06, 20 October 2011 (UTC) I disagree, it stays until something else comes up. MillerCrosses (talk) 22:53, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well you don't own the page either, so why don't you let this public page be public. Hate to tell you you're not in control of the page, but guess what. MillerCrosses (talk) 12:35, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is a rumour that is stated as a rumour and should be there there as it is interesting for readers, and is accompanied by a video of the band playing with the singer. It stayed there long enough before you personally decided it was disruptive when it is clearly okay by others and does not cause any problems. They haven't confirmed it so it still says rumour, you can read that yourself. You are being equally disruptive by deleting and telling others that you have decided what should stay (whether that is in the guidelines or not). My addition is not a lie, does not cause any confusion and is interesting enough for this page. MillerCrosses (talk) 16:32, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is one, single, individual rumour, not a collection. It is relevant for the time being, he played with them, they said they were working with one of the singers, he is the most likely. If, say, two/three months go by and nothing is heard (still definitely not enough time but okay) then it is irrelevant. Right now it is causing no problem whatsoever. MillerCrosses (talk) 16:53, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]