User talk:Kimchi.sg
 | I am busy in real life. Any messages you leave here may not be replied to for several weeks or longer. If you left a message and it no longer appears on this page, please check the page history or the archives (full list on the right) to see if I have replied. Pegasus «C¦T» 15:12, 4 January 2008 (UTC) |
Neologism or not this page had interesting and valuable data not replicated elsewhere in Wikipedia. Your eagerness to delete other people's hard work is unbecoming at best. 75.70.72.70 (talk) 19:03, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Your eagerness to suspect me of deleting a page that has never been created before is equally unbecoming. Pegasus «C¦T» 00:31, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- Don't attribute to eagerness what can be more reasonably attributed to routine. Someone else proposed it for deletion, and since no one objected to the deletion proposal in five days, it was removed. Lots of other pages get blown away that way. Regarding your first comment... just because a page has "interesting and valuable data not replicated elsewhere in Wikipedia" does not mean it will not be deleted. Looking at the deleted article, the reason for proposing deletion was justified. Pegasus «C¦T» 11:13, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Sorry but I'm confused as to why you deleted the band page for Alter Der Ruine. There were multiple press sources including the Phoenix New Times (circulation: 111,408). The sources describe how the band is a known name in the industrial scene, popular in Europe, and Google search returns aprox. 10,500 results.
I understand after I created the entry fans of the band expanded and editorialized the article but from my perspective that just means it needs to be be truncated not deleted.
Andhelostthem —Preceding comment was added at 19:03, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Done Restored. Pegasus «C¦T» 15:27, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Comments, please
Hello, Kimchi.sg ... It's been a few weeks since our last contact (I had another IP address then) when you declined a CSD, but took the article to AfD, where it was subsequently deleted.
I've recently made some changes to my Protocol to minimize friction from proposed and speedy deletions based on feedback from Some Other Editors, the biggest being changes to the {{Warn-article}} and {{Warn-editor}} templates ... they're not as verbose, and look less like "warnings" and more like "FYI" tags, which is really where the whole flag it and then take a time-out paradigm was coming from.
Please see User:The Bipolar Anon-IP Gnome#Protocols for deletion warnings for the "condensed" version ... the bulk of the discussion is currently on the Warn-article talk page, so please respond there ... Happy Editing! —72.75.72.63 (talk · contribs) 18:45, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi Pegasus: I was trying to document Behance Network as part of group on online communities like DeviantArt and others for creative professionals. Using the references such as BusinessWeek's inclusion of the site in its "Most Exclusive Social Networks,"http://images.businessweek.com/ss/07/11/1115_in_ingated/source/6.htm I figured it was relevant. Is it not? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Creativeprofessional (talk • contribs) 08:16, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
An oldie
Hi Pegasus. You deleted Truth Serum back in 2006 as a speedy under A7. I've only just noticed. The issue is that A7 doesn't actually apply, since the work was a published comic book, available from Slave Labor Graphics. Would you mind if I restored the article? I know it's an oldie, and I could be bold, but I figure it's best to ask first. The gn was reviewed here, [1]. Hiding T 20:10, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Done Restored. Pegasus «C¦T» 00:09, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Heinrich Hertz
Please consider re-visiting Talk:Heinrich Hertz#jewish ancestry. I'd be interested in your feedback about the suggested edit strategy I've proposed. --Ooperhoofd (talk) 16:03, 11 January 2008 (UTC)