User talk:LRBurdak: Difference between revisions

; Archives
	Jan 2005 – Dec 2005; Jan 2006 – Jun 2006; Jul 2006 – Dec 2006; Jan 2007 – Jun 2007; ; ;

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 14:38, 27 December 2013

Vinay Jha 15:12, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Click here to leave a new message.

Welcome! स्वागतम्! ॐ शान्ति ! शान्ति !! शान्ति !!!

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.

Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Thank you.

Tourism in Madhya Pradesh

I noticed that recently you added a section to Tourism in India called Tourism in Madhya Pradesh. I thought that there was enough information there for an entire article, so I used your input for that section to creat another article by the name of Tourism in Madhya Pradesh. I did have to reformat the article a bit to make it a little easier to read, I also did some research and used some of the best images that I could find to add to the article. After I created the new article using your information I reduced what was in the section for Madhya Pradesh in the Tourism in India article. I have acually made three new articles using the infomation from that one article. Also Tourism in Maharashtra, and Tourism in Andhra Pradesh. Check it out. جميع أفراد المجتمع المؤهلين مدعوون للتصويت في انتخابات مجلس أمناء مؤسسة ويكيميديا.

Hi Mindys12345 ! Thanks for creating separate page for Tourism in Madhya Pradesh. It is nice. We are planning to expand it. --burdak 04:50, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent, thanks, I am glad you like it. User:Mindys12345 aka جميع أفراد المجتمع المؤهلين مدعوون للتصويت في انتخابات مجلس أمناء مؤسسة ويكيميديا.

Excellent work, added them to Wikipedia:Notice board for India-related topics/It's new. utcursch | talk 11:53, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou, always happy to help out. Mindys12345 এই সভ্যজন অসমৰجميع أفراد المجتمع . .

Hi. Yes I would like to have a look, I am just about to retire for the night so I will probably get stuck in sometime tommorrow. Thanks Mindys12345स्वागतम्! ॐ शान्ति ! शान्ति !! शान्ति !!!

I had a look at Tribals in Madhya Pradesh, the format for that article seems to be fine. The other article might need a bit. I'll try to think of something, I have an Idea but that might make the article to long. I'll get back to you later with some ideas if poss. Thanks Mindys12345स्वागतम्! ॐ शान्ति ! शान्ति !! शान्ति !!! 05:24, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re : Jat Page

Please stop removing the tags of the Jat page without discussion. This makes us Jatts look like we cannot discuss issues in a rational manner. Also these tags have now been removed several times so I will be left with no option but to report this matter if this continues and the page may be locked. Thanks --Sikh-history 11:34, 20 July 2007 (UTC) DS Dhaliwal.[reply]

There is already a dispute tag on the header seems not necessary to put more dispute tags on each section. There is limit of period for such tags and if dispute is not resolved these can be removed. There seems not much of contribution to this page from your side. By the way whom do you expect to resolve these tags and within what period? burdak 16:38, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have you read the yahoo groups link?

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JatHistory/message/4526

It is made very clear in that link chandragupta is not gutta and hence not jatta/jat/jutta. Calling Chandragupta a jat is just a figment of imagination of some and nothing else. Please stop vandalising this page with your bias.

Itihaaskar 20:40, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I request you to stop vandalising the jat page. Itihaaskar 19:34, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We need some impartial anthropological evidence. We need to seperate what is religious history (in my case Sikh but also Hindu), and what is Jatt history. We need ISBN numbers for ALL refrences. Till then we will not be taken seriously and we will be attacked.--Sikh-history 18:55, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete content from Jat people

You have been warned but still deleting content from Jat people and vandalizing it, which is your only contribution to Wikipedia. If you have something discuss. You are again and again writing only one line that Chandragupta is not Jat. It is not sufficient to prove any thing. So please come forward with any substantial proof. Don't delete content from Jat people without discussion !!! --burdak 15:19, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot spread lies. Have you read this?

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JatHistory/message/4526

Itihaaskar 17:12, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ithihaaskar

You must also quote the rest of the discussion, to the above message.

Ravi Chaudhary 19:50, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is a figment of imagination to associate Chandragupts Maurya with Jats. He belonged to the Mauria/Muria clan, and that is why Peacock was a taboo for Mauryas. Jats have no association with Mauriya/Muria/Maurya (cf. Romila Thapar's 'Asoka and the decline of the MAuryas'). But Itihaaskar should not delete others' views, Itihaaskar should add his own version. --Vinay Jha 15:12, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Itihaaskar

If you have any reason to believe that User:Itihaaskar is a sockpuppet, please file a Request for Checkuser. The best way to solve a content dispute is filing a Request for Comment. utcursch | talk 07:30, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

G.D. KUMAR

Dear Burdak, Early this year you thought of looking for Kumar's portrait. Any hope of finding one ? All the best.--BobClive 05:46, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shekhsar

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Shekhsar, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.jatland.com/home/Godara. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 04:46, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Attribution to Jatland

Jatland has been Attributed that The original text of this article was taken from http://www.jatland.com/home/Godara, and http://www.jatland.com/home/Shekhsar, which is licensed under the GFDL. Hence no copyright violation. --burdak 05:13, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please let me know, why you people are interested in not keeping the p c chandawat wiki page. Is it not maintaining the WIKI rules regulations ? Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shrimali (talk • contribs) 14:55, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dhetarwal

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Dhetarwal, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.jatland.com/home/Dhetarwal. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 16:13, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Attribution - The original text of this article was taken from http://www.jatland.com/home/Dhetarwal, which is licensed under the GFDL. --burdak 03:31, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Citations needed in History of Rajasthan

The article mentions in ancient history section about kingdoms of Rajputs in 6th century. The term Rajput was invented about 7th century AD. It seems speculation. Thakur Deshraj is one of the prominent Historian. He has mentioned about Rajputs in his book on Jat history page 113-114, The Gazetteer of India Vol 2 (page 307-308), Which deals with the Rajputs writes as under:

"Then between the 7th and 8th centuries the old racial divisions passed away and a new division came in founded upon status and function.... The rise of Rajputs determined the whole political history of time. They made their first appearance in 8-9th centuries; most of the greatest clans took possession of their seats between 800 and 850 AD. ..."

In view of these facts the ancient history of Rajasthan needs revision. If the contributirs feel they have facts they may provide in the article. So I have put citation tags. --burdak 04:46, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Editing if nagvansh

Why I should stop from deleting some material?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.163.192.85 (talk) 09:05, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why I moved the image of the so-called "Indian Bison"

It seems that Mr. Burdak has not read the article on bison from which I moved the image before he saw fit to (wrongly) criticise me again. The article on Bison very clearly says: "Bison is a taxonomic group containing six species of large even-toed ungulates within the subfamily Bovinae. Only two of these species still exist: the American Bison (B. bison) and the European Bison, or wisent (B. bonasus)."

In fact the article on Bison states very clearly: "The gaur, a large, thick-coated ox found in Asia, is also known as the Indian Bison, although it is in the genus Bos and thus not a true bison."

This means that, even though the Gaur is sometimes referred to as the "Indian Bison" - this is an incorrect naming (rather like the American Bison being called a Buffalo - which it is not). So, it should not be pictured on the bison page.

I will, therefore, move this image once again - to its proper place in the article on the Gaur (Bos gaurus). John Hill 04:11, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Parasram Maderna.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Parasram Maderna.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. OsamaK 19:52, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Karvir (clan)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Karvir (clan), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Karvir (clan) seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Karvir (clan), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 18:02, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep

Karvir is one of ancient clans of hostorical importance. The article is in offing and will slowly develope. If deleted we will loose info about ancient Iranian clan which spread up to India. It is requested to keep it. burdak 12:45, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question?

Burdak is it correct that some Muslim Jat people in Pakistan use the surname Chaudhary, if this is correct it MUST be listed as one of the Jat clans names and please also do an article on it- thanks.--Jat78 (talk) 13:03, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chaudhary surname

It is correct that many Muslim Jat people in Pakistan use the surname Chaudhary. Also in India. It is based on title. Article is already there in Wikipedia. We need to expand it. We will do it very soon. Thanks. burdak (talk) 16:23, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Burdak question?? Hansarah Jat gotra information?

Dear Burdak, can you tell me if Hansarah is a Jat gotra and where they are from in India and their history. I need this because a friend is considering marriage into this gotra, friend needs to know EVERYTHING about this gotra. Please can you give me a lot of information about the Hansarah gotra?--Jat78 (talk) 18:13, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gotra Hansarah

I do not find exactly Hansarah gotra in literature available with me. I give some links which may have probable linkages. Hans, Hansawat, Hanselia. burdak (talk) 16:23, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Justice Mahavir singh.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Justice Mahavir singh.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:45, 1 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —An gr ^{If you've written a quality article...} 19:45, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Swami Omanand.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Swami Omanand.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:45, 1 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —An gr ^{If you've written a quality article...} 19:45, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Kumbharam Arya1.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Kumbharam Arya1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:45, 1 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —An gr ^{If you've written a quality article...} 19:45, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Devilal.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Devilal.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:45, 1 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —An gr ^{If you've written a quality article...} 19:45, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{GFDL-self}} tag

Thanks Angr for reminding me. I had created these images and now put the {{GFDL-self}} tag. --burdak (talk) 11:24, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bhobia

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Bhobia, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.jatland.com/home/Bhobia. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:22, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Bhobia

Article takes contents from Jatland Wiki, which is licensed under GFDL, There is due attribution recorded as under:

Attribution - The original text of this article is taken from http://www.jatland.com/home/Bhaubhia, which is licensed under GFDL

Hence article Bhobia may not be deleted. These is no copyright violation. burdak (talk) 07:37, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:288baladitya-and-yashodharma.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:288baladitya-and-yashodharma.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:29, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kanswa

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Kanswa, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.jatland.com/home/Kanswa. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:59, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re : Kanswa

This stub takes contents from Jatland Wiki, which is licensed under GFDL, There is due attribution recorded as under:

Attribution - The original text of this article is taken from http://www.jatland.com/home/Kanswa, which is licensed under GFDL. These is no copyrighted content and hence no violation of copyright.Hence article Kanswa may not be deleted. burdak (talk) 04:05, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

White Tiger Picture

Hello there LRBurdak,

I saw that you uploaded this White Tiger picture here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:White_Tiger.jpg

I got an enquiry about the photo, Where did you take this photo? As in, is it in an Indian Zoo? I ask that because i am very interested to know whether this is a purebred Bengal White Tiger. As you know White Tigers from all around the world(except India) are all Bengal/Siberian Hybrid Tigers so seeing a picture of a purebred White Bengal Tiger is rare.

So did you take this photo at an Indian Zoo? Can you please specify its name so that i can contact it on whether or not their white tigers are purebred Bengal?

Thanks alot. China's Tiger (talk) 10:14, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject India Newsletter Volume III, Issue no. 001 - June 2008

Project News

Tag & Assess 2008, an assessment drive initiated by the assessment department began on June 7, 2008 and will be running until July 2008. Many Wikipedians have started contributing to this mammoth task. This housekeeping activity will help manage articles in better way. You can also get involved!
Bot Assisted Assessment was successfully done using Bot0612 in May 2008. 1744 articles (18.5%) of all India unassessed articles were marked if they had been assessed by some other project.
What's Featured and Good?

Five new articles were promoted to featured article status in 2008: Western Chalukya architecture, 2007 Samjhauta Express bombings, Akhtar Hameed Khan, Preity Zinta, Kannada literature in the Vijayanagara Empire.
Two new lists were given featured list status in 2008: List of international cricket centuries by Sachin Tendulkar, List of Victoria Cross recipients by nationality.
There is currently one Indian article as a featured article nominee. Two more articles, (Bengali language, Kazi Nazrul Islam) are undergoing featured article reviews. You could help save these two articles by leaving your comments or assisting the involved editors.
Three articles are undergoing good article nominations: Anekantavada, A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada and Santosh Subramaniam.

IPL was hot on Wikipedia too!!! During the tournament, the article was among the most frequently edited articles. It is currently the only Indian article in top 100, occupying 58th spot.
Do you know of an article that is currently underrated? If so, please nominate the article at the Assessment Department's request for assessment. This will allow our project to get a better idea of the quality of our articles.

Article statistics and to-do lists

Article Statistics

Make visible or invisible by clicking Show or Hide, respectively.

Complete To-Do List

Make visible or invisible by clicking Show or Hide, respectively.

Current proposals and discussions
Is India the largest democracy? A request has been made to the Mediation Cabal for mediation on India article. There is currently an ongoing edit war if India be called the largest democracy of world. Interested in a specific topic? Article watchlists have been automated using Ganeshbot. Just locate your watchlist to keep track of all articles within the topic. Example:Wikipedia:WikiProject Chennai/Articles. Wikipedia India Quiz continues to attract old and new Wikipedians and remains a hotspot of the community. You are invited to join in and have fun.
From the Editors
If you've just joined, add your name to the Members section of Wikipedia:WikiProject India and also may choose to get this newsletter get it delivered as desired. This is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue (Issue 2 – July 2008). Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing! The last newsletter was more than a year ago and after feeling the pinch, we got together in working towards in renewing this feature for our members. Fresh pair of legs we are, and hence can greatly improve with your suggestions and ideas. Please feel free to let us know of your thoughts. We hope to release the newsletter on a monthly/bi-monthly basis as per our initial thoughts. Contributors to this Issue Mspraveen (Co-editor) Gppande (Co-editor) Tinucherian (Co-editor, Distributor)
Did You Know?
... that India was the 44th most visited page on Wikipedia in February 2008 and it received received 706,558 visitors in May 2008? ... that if you need any help, advice, or have any announcements to make regarding India-related articles then you can do it here?

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This newsletter is automatically delivered by TinucherianBot (talk) 06:27, 16 June 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Image source problem with Image:Barkatullah.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Barkatullah.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:26, 21 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. O sama K 18:26, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Barkatullah.JPG

GFDL tag has been added to Image:Barkatullah.JPG. Thanks.

Thank you for trying to fix. If you scanned, took, or downloaded it from somewhere, just tell where did you find that image. GFDL tag doesn't tell the source. Thank you again. Happy editing, Happy uploading.--O sama K 15:04, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I have put the source on the image. burdak (talk) 02:13, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!--O sama K 06:56, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Swami Omanand.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Swami Omanand.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Storkk (talk) 10:08, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed GFDL-self tag and put GFDL-tag on the image. Thanks for correcting.burdak (talk) 02:10, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi... please see my comment on the discussion page... did the original author really license the image GFDL?? If you could give the original author, the original date, as well as the source you got it from and its date of publication, then since this person is dead, an argument could be made that you could claim Fair Use for this picture as long as you provide a {{rationale}} claiming it to be irreplaceable and necessary for each article that it is featured in (it would probably have to be removed from Jat people, but could stay on en.wikipedia servers and illustrate his article). Cheers, Storkk (talk) 05:01, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Here is the source http://www.jatland.com/home/Image:Swami_Omanand.jpg It is Having GFDL licence. No copy right. Thanks. burdak (talk) 08:15, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indian leopard

Hi, where did you make this picture of an Indian leopard? Was it in a National Park? Thanks--Altaileopard (talk) 08:30, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Indian leopard

Hi this picture of an Indian leopard is from Van Vihar National Park, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh. Thanks--burdak (talk) 16:36, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, thank you. I will include it in the article Van Vihar National Park.--Altaileopard (talk) 13:32, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bhishmaka

A tag has been placed on Bhishmaka, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. WWGB (talk) 12:13, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Guru Hanuman

Do you know whether Guru Hanuman was a Jat.Shyamsunder 17:21, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Shyamsunder, I am not sure about Guru Hanuman. Not found in list of Jats. burdak (talk) 04:53, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks Sudhir Kumar87 (talk) 11:20, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of the Mahabharata tribes - Roma

Hi,

Can you please take a look at my question at Talk:List of the Mahabharata tribes?

Thanks in advance. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 16:10, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed Roma

Thanks Amir E. Aharoni. I have changed it to Romana as used in Mahabharata English version along with Sanskrit name. I have merged Roma and Romaka to Romana. Romana still leads to a wrong link so put it as under: Romana (रॊमाण)(VI.10.54). burdak (talk) 02:43, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Roma (city) (रोम)

Mahabharata Sabha Parva (II.48.49) mentions a city Roma in Sahdeva's conquest. So with modification added again as Roma (city) (रोम)- antākhīṃ caiva romāṃ ca yavanānāṃ puraṃ tathā, dūtair eva vaśe cakre karaṃ cainān adāpayat Mahabharata Sabha Parva (II.48.49) burdak (talk) 04:33, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

new article

Dear Mr. Burdak, Could you please review and improve this article regarding Justice Kan Singh Parihar. With best wishes and regards. Thanks. Jodmar (talk) 04:10, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GREETINGS

WISH YOU A HAPPY NEW YEAR!--BobClive (talk) 08:13, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings

Dear Burdak,

Wishing You and Your Family A Happy and Prosperous New Year 2009.

Jodmar (talk) 19:17, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Hathugumpha1.JPG

File:Hathugumpha1.JPG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Hathigumpha.JPG. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Hathigumpha.JPG]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 15:21, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to jat, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sikh-history (talk) 17:16, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject India Newsletter, Volume IV, Issue 1 – June 2009

Project news

Congratulations to the West Bengal workgroup for having their flagship article featured on the Main Page! The Indian states workgroup is also involved in maintaining articles about India's states and union territories. »

WikiProject Indian roads was recently started as a new workgroup, to standardize and improve articles related to Indian roads, mainly the National and State Highways. After all, India has the second largest road network in the world.

Iravan, the son of Arjuna, is now our 85^th good article. How do we know this? Since last year, more processes have been automated, increasing productivity. Article alerts update the project with what's happening to India-related articles, from copyright violations to featured article candidates.

To do…

During the last few weeks, peer reviews for the recent general election and 2003 Afro-Asian Games (held in Hyderabad) were opened and are waiting for more comments, as are several articles at the peer review department. Sikkim has been nominated for FAR, and Hastings Ismay, 1st Baron Ismay has been nominated for FAC. »

Currently, 11,091 Indian articles need images. Please improve these pages, especially if you enjoy photography! We look forward to more contributions from you. To get started, go to the noticeboard. »

From the editors…

The last newsletter was written a year ago. In June 2008, Indian Premier League was "hot" on Wikipedia, but the article about this year's IPL has attracted 477 editors, or 53% more than the previous year! Even the number of articles in the scope of our project jumped by a whopping 18,500+ articles in an year. The 3.2-year-old India quiz continues to attract old and new Wikipedians, so join in the fun!

Wikipedians are organizing a meetup in Bangalore on July 4 or 5. If you are interested, head over to the page and add your name! Topics of discussion include Indian language editions of Wikipedia and Wikimedia India.

RegentsPark, one of the prominent members of our project, was promoted to adminship this year. If you'd like to know who are the most avid editors of Wikipedia by number of edits, refer to this list.

"While this issue has been resolved, one asks the question – what happens when there is a conflict of opinions? What about a Wikipedia entry on India and Pakistan, or the LTTE and the Tamils? Who can edit? Will the information be true?" writes B. Narasimhan of MiD DAY as deeper implications of the Scientology arbitration case,¹ reminding us of the core principles of verifiability and the neutral point of view.

This is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue. Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!

— [sd], Ganeshk and Tinu Cherian

Project · Portal · Members · Noticeboard · Discussion⁺

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. This newsletter is automatically delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 11:21, 12 June 2009 (UTC) [reply]

WikiProject India Newsletter, Volume IV, Issue 2 – July 2009

Project news

File:India 1947 India Flag 3 and half annas.jpg

A number of India-related articles have lost their featured article status, including Sikkim and Mumbai. The article about Gandhi was also demoted for referencing and image quality issues. Since then, Mumbai has been brought back to good article status, thanks to the efforts of Kensplanet and others.

Transport in India was promoted to good article status, thanks to the efforts of Rsrikanth05, SBC-YPR and GDibyendu.

Several new workgroups have been formed: WikiProjects Railways in India, Education in India and Transport in India. Please join us if you're interested in those topics!

To do...

The articles that have been selected for our latest collaborations of the month are history of Mumbai, Indian Railways, rail transport in India, Indian general election, 2009 and telecommunications in India. We need your help to improve them!

These India-related articles are currently on featured article review: Kerala (FAR), Brihanmumbai Electric Supply and Transport (FAR) and rail transport in India (FAR). Would you allow these articles to lose their FA status?

Wikipedia Takes Chennai – a scavenger hunt and free-content photography contest – has started in Chennai, along the same lines as Wikipedia Takes The City.

We look forward to more contributions from you. To get started, go to the noticeboard. »

From the editors...

Wikipedians in Bangalore organised a meetup on 5 July 2009; thanks to Tinu Cherian for hosting the event! Arunram and Tinu Cherian wrote extensively about the meetup, which was also covered by Wikizine, Headlines India and The Wikipedia Signpost. Photos have been uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. Sunil Abraham from the Centre for Internet and Society has offered to help host such events in the future. All in all, the meetup was a great success. Watch out for the next meetup! »

Nichalp, an Indian bureaucrat and major contributor to more than 23 India-related featured articles and lists, was desysopped over allegations of paid editing and using sock puppets. An RfC about paid editing was opened as a result of this incident.

A prolific editor and administrator, Bhadani is among the top ten Wikipedians by number of edits across the English Wikipedia. Congratulations to Bhadani for also making the most number of edits among Indian Wikipedians!

Are you subscribed to wikimediaindia-l to learn about the latest developments of forming the Indian chapter of Wikimedia? Did you know that there are IRC channels for Wikipedians interested in India like you? Check them out at #wikipedia-in ^connect and #wikimedia-in ^connect!

Wikipedia's India quiz remains a hotspot of the community by continuing to attract old and new Wikipedians. You are invited to join in and have fun!

This is your newsletter, and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue. Any and all contributions are welcome – so feel free to join in! Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!

— Ncmvocalist, RegentsPark, [sd] and Tinu Cherian

Project · Portal · Members · Noticeboard · Discussion⁺

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. Delivered automatically by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 15:12, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Budania

I have nominated Budania, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Budania. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jwesley78 (talk) 06:27, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Hello. It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on others' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote—in order to influence Budania. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. warrior 4321 02:15, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dharmrajeshwar

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Dharmrajeshwar, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.jatland.com/home/Dhamnar. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:07, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

copyvio Dharmrajeshwar

The content on Jatland site is having GFDL license hence no copy right violation. See http://www.jatland.com/home/Jatland_Wiki:Copyrights

I am expanding the article and removing copyvio tag. Thanks. burdak (talk) 15:06, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

You may or may not be aware that Wikipedia textual content was relicensed sometime last year to be GFDL/cc-by-sa-3.0. Consequently, we can no longer accept text that is solely licensed under the GFDL, like from [1]. See the terms of use for more details (under "importing text"). MER-C 10:01, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Jandu

Hi LRBurdak. So far yours is the onlty decent reference I have found on Jandu. I was wondering, in order to prevent vandalism from from what I can only describe as a few "zealots", could you add more references. Expansion on the Ramgarhia/Punjab Jandu's would be good too, and an explanation as to how they became separated from their Harayanavi and Rajhasthani brethren and became a different caste. In England and Canada "Jandu" Ramgarhia's are very famous poets and song writers. So called "Janu Litteranwala" has sold millions of records and written for many famous singers. Thanks and Best Wishes.--Sikh-History 10:02, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello: just finished copyedit Maharani Kishori...

and wanted to let you know. Please look it over (if you are still interested) and let me know; maybe you would answer some questions to make the article clearer? Cheers! Shir-El too 17:33, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! If you would be so kind: what exactly is a "mahal"? I cannot find it in the dictionary or references. By inference, does it mean "great building" or "estate"? or "temple"? Thank you, Shir-El too 17:46, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello LRBurdak! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 6 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 105 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Alka Tomar - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Narendra Budania - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Arvind Kumar Burdak - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Sona Ram - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Kamal Patel - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Chaudhary Ajit Singh - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 16:55, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion...

I enjoyed editing (and reading) the Maharani Kishori article and followed one of the links to learn more. I appreciate the cultural and language-based stylistic differences between Hindi and English in general, and Wikipedia in particular; I would like to offer my help updating the related articles, if you are interested and would be willing to answer questions that would come up. Thank you, Shir-El too 19:28, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Asiagh

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Asiagh. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asiagh. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:04, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hi burdak ji,

Why dont you apply for admin. status than at least we will have a fellow Jat admin,,moreover you have many edits to support this status...

plus can you provide more refs in List of Jats ???,,,,I added many but not all..

-- Last Emperor (talk) 16:04, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ok -- Last Emperor (talk) 16:31, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Natthan Singh

The article Natthan Singh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for reliable sources found nothing that could establish notability. I could not find anything online about the reference cited in the references section.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Joshua Scott (LiberalFascist) talk 00:46, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New articles

Dear Burdak sir, i add some pages i.e. Didel, Dantusliya, Deh, India and Rol Qazian. Please review and improve these articles.

With best wishes and regards. Thanks.

Premsukhdidel (talk) 15:07, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Natthan Singh

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Natthan Singh. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natthan Singh. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:04, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Gogaji.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Gogaji.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:01, 5 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:01, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

bat sun mare

burdak bat sunn le. charan singh aur usme bias kyo tu dale hai.. tane chaudhry likhan ke pasie mile hove lagta hai.

aur ek aur baat tane jat ithias itan likhan ka ke shookk hai...apna dimag aur dhanke cheezo mein laga le kakaa.

india ke bare mein soch aur caste wagera manaa..

dimag ko theek kar.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Singhwasking (talk • contribs) 04:53, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

bias manna ban...dang tee reh le warna ktana ke dair nhe lagte.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Singhwasking (talk • contribs) 04:49, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject India Newsletter Volume V, Issue no. 1 - (June 2010)

Project News

WP:IND Newsletter is back! It's been nearly a year since the last edition, but we hope to bring out issues on a more regular basis now. The India Wikiproject was set up to increasing coverage of India-related topics on Wikipedia, and over the past few months the focus has been on improving article quality. A number of the project's featured articles underwent featured article reviews over the past year. Of these, Darjeeling and Flag of India survived the review process, while the rest were demoted. During the same period, Gangtok, Harbhajan Singh, Darjeeling and Mysore were featured on the main page respectively on August 20, September 17, November 6 and December 29, 2009. Meanwhile, articles on topics as diverse as Political history of Mysore and Coorg (1565–1760), Marwari horse and Iravan were promoted as featured articles, and respectively appeared on the main page on March 25, May 17 and May 28, 2010. Consequently, the number of FA-class articles under the project's scope dropped from 67 in August 2009 to 63 in June 2010. The number of good articles, however, saw a more than 40% increase, from 91 to 130 during the same period, while the number of featured lists saw a 33% increase from 12 to 16.

Due to the recent policy changes regarding unreferenced Biographies of Living People (BLPs), an effort was started in January 2010 to source all unreferenced BLPs coming under Wikiproject India. 1200 such articles were identified initially and more were added to the list later. Due to the sourcing effort, the number of Indian unreferenced BLPs is down to 565 currently. During February-April 2010, There was a large scale disruption of Kerala related articles by a Thrissur based IP vandal. Editing from a dynamic IP BSNL connection, the vandal changed dates of birth, death and ages of a number of Malayalam and Tamil film actors. Later he added a few international biographies to his list. He also marked some living people like Arvind Swamy as dead. A month long range block was imposed on his IP range two times and each time he came back to vandalise dates once the block expired. Currently the range has been blocked for three months till September 11, 2010.

What's New?

Three members of the project, Abecedare, Tinu Cherian and SpacemanSpiff received their sysop mops in October-December 2009. Congratulations!
This picture, shot in India, won the Commons:Picture of the Year contest 2009. Translations of the description in Indian languages are solicited.
Wikipedians in Bangalore have been organising periodic meetups over the past year, in collaboration with the Centre for Internet and Society. The next meetup is scheduled for July 18, 2010. Indian and other Wikipedians from all Wikipedias in various languages are welcome to attend.

Current proposals and discussions

Please add Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics to your watchlist in order to stay updated with the latest discussions regarding various aspects of the project.

A discussion is underway here to reach a consensus regarding the use of Indian number names (lakh, crore etc.) in Wikipedia articles. Please participate and add your comments.

Join the effort to source and save unreferenced Indian BLPs.

Some unintended vandalism is going on at the Assamese Wikipedia by the sole active editor. This is a request for Assamese-conversant Wikipedians to help resolve the issue.

A discussion is in progress here in order to determine whether non-Western (including Indian) forms of classical music should be referred to by the nomenclature of art music instead of classical music. Please participate and add your comments.

Watchlist the Articles for Deletions page for India related discussions. Opinions from more Indian Wikipedians are required in many of the discussions.

The World Classical Tamil Conference 2010 is at present underway in Coimbatore, and the Tamil Wikipedia is actively involved at the event. A detailed report will follow in the next issue.

Wikimania 2010 is happening in Poland from July 7-11. Indian Wikipedians attending include Gurubrahma, Shiju Alex, Ravidreams , Santhosh Thottingal, Tinu Cherian, WMF Board member Bishakha Datta and Advisory Board member Achal Prabala. We wish them all the best! More on their experiences in the next issue.

If you've just joined, add your name to the Members section of WikiProject India. You'll get a mention in the next issue of the Newsletter and get it delivered as desired. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy!

Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue (Issue 2 – (July 2010)). Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!

Looking forward toward more contributions from you!

Complete To Do List

Signed...

SBC-YPR (Editor)
Sodabottle (Editor)
Tinu Cherian (Distributor)

Although having the newsletter appear on everyone's userpage is desired, this may not be ideal for everyone. If, in the future, you wish to receive a link to the newsletter, rather than the newsletter itself, you may mention it at WikiProject India Outreach Department

This newsletter is automatically delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 18:20, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem

Hello. On November 5th, a contributor listed Jat history (1669-1858), an article which you created, for copyright review. On brief examination, his concerns do seem to be substantiated. For example, in your foundational edit, you included the following text:

The Jats, though simmering with discontent, were constrained to remain quiet during these ten years. It is not difficult to trace the reasons for their general passivity. The bitter memory of their ruthless suppression by the imperialists had yet not faded completely form their minds. They must have been deterred also by Emperor’s general success against his enemies. Then again it is also likely that the Jats as yet were not able to make good their heavy loss suffered during the preceding encounter with the Mughals.

This book says:

The Jats, though simmering with discontent, were constrained to remain quiet during these ten years. It is not difficult to trace the reasons for their general passivity. It is not difficult to trace the reasons for their general passivity. The bitter memory of their ruthless suppression by the imperialists had yet not faded completely from their minds. They must have been deterred also by Emperor's general success against his enemies. Then again, it is also likely that the Jats as yet were not able to make good their heavy loss, suffered during the preceding encounter with the Mughals.

More content has been copied from that book:

I do not yet know if other books were copied as well, but unless we can verify permission for the content or otherwise determine that it is free for our reuse, the article will have to be rewritten from scratch or deleted. You should have been notified on November 5th of these concerns to give you time to address them. As you were not, I am notifying you now and relisting the matter. Since it contains many useful links, I will give you the official notice below. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 15:23, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have now also blanked 1669 Jat uprising, as it seems to contain content from the same book. If you can verify permission to reuse this content, as set forth in the official notice below, both articles can be restored. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 15:36, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The official notice: Copyright problem: Jat history (1669–1858)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Jat history (1669–1858), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from (see article's talk page), and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Jat history (1669–1858) and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Jat history (1669–1858), in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Jat history (1669–1858) with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Jat history (1669–1858). See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Jat history (1669–1858) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 15:23, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems: clarification

I was away on tour and could not access Wikipedia. I found on return that a lot of content has been deleted. The articles

are based on content from 'The Jats, their role in the Mughal Empire' by Girish Chandra Dwivedi - 1989. The author of this book died long back at an early age of forty-one. As such these are not now copyrighted contents. Regards, burdak (talk) 04:24, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dwivedi died in 1979 (according to http://www.infibeam.com/Books/info/dr-girish-chandra-dwivedi/jats-their-role-mughal-empire/9788188629084.html#newUsedBooks). The duration of copyright under Indian copyright law is sixty years from the beginning of the calendar year next following the year in which the author dies.(section 22; page `15) His works remain under copyright in India until 2039.

Meanwhile, since you did not return in time to see the examples at the talk pages, I moved them to Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2010 November 13, except for the listing on Jat history (1669–1858), since there were examples already at your talk page. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 11:39, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The copyright of the book 'The Jats - Their Role in the Mughal Empire' by Dr Girish Chandra Dwivedi was purchased by Surajmal Memorial Education Society Delhi and Edited by Dr Vir Singh in 2003. It was Published by M/S Originals (an imprint of low priced publications), A-6, Nimri commercial Centre, Near Ashok Vihar, Phase-IV, Delhi-110052. Before posting these articles on Wikipedia I had contacted Editor Dr Vir Singh who permitted me to do so. So these articles may be restored back. Regards --burdak (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Only if they verify their copyright ownership and their license through proper procedures. These are explained in the template above. And this does not address content added from other books. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:36, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jat history (1669-1858)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jat history (1669-1858) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ttonyb (talk) 04:44, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I intended to put a clarification about the article which was wrongly put on article page which has been moved by me to its talk page. burdak (talk) 05:36, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 1669 Jat uprising

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 1669 Jat uprising requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ttonyb (talk) 04:46, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I intended to put a clarification about the article which was wrongly put on article page which has been moved by me to its talk page. burdak (talk) 05:43, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issues

There are copyright concerns about a number of your articles - see Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2010 November 13. Please contact Moonriddengirl (talk · contribs). JohnCD (talk) 09:56, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject India Newsletter Volume V, Issue no. 2 - November 2010

English WikiProject News

After a missed issue, the WP:IND newsletter is back on track to being a regular bimonthly feature. The Indian WikiProject has seen plenty of online and off-line action, both in English as well as other Indian languages, and we now have a bigger, better format that intends to feature content and news from the English as well as other Indian language Wikipedias.

Reaching out to Indians has been the theme of the Indian Wikiproject over the past couple of months, aiming to involve a greater number of Indians in editing both the English and Indian language Wikipedias. To this end, efforts to set up the Indian chapter of Wikimedia have moved into their final stages, and registration of the society is currently pending. An effort is underway to push for "WikiMarathons" at meetups, where attendees will be encouraged to edit the English and/or Indian language Wikipedias. This is intended to popularise Wikipedia editing among the general public. In addition, a bot to post DYK's from the Indian Wikiproject to Twitter was created and launched by User:Logicwiki.

What's New?

Regrettably, the number of Featured Articles has dropped from 63 in June to 58 at the end of October 2010. Several FAs came up for review and were delisted, while Fundamental Rights, Directive Principles and Fundamental Duties of India was saved. Meanwhile, Chalukya Dynasty appeared on the main page on July 9, 2010. Hearteningly, the number of Good Articles increased from 130 to 136 during the same period, while the number of Featured Lists remained constant at 16.

The source code for the Article Alert Bot is now available and the bot itself is expected to be up and running very shortly. This means that article alerts for the Indian Wikiproject will again be available, enabling editors to easily keep track of developments in respect of reviews, nominations, deletions etc.

The date change vandal mentioned briefly in the previous issue made a reappearance when the range block on his IP range expired in September. Consequently the block was extended till September 2011.

In October there was a heated discussion in the India project noticeboard regarding the copyright status of the Indian party symbols. The discussion was triggered by the deletion of Wiki San Roze's party symbol images by Hammersoft as copyright violations. No resolution was reached, partly because of our inability to explain to Hammersoft how election symbols in India differ from party logos. Comments are requested from anyone with a background in Indian copyright law to clarify this issue.

Complete To Do List

News from Indian-language Wikipedias

The Bengali Wikisource, which contains the literary works of many prominent writers of Bengali language including Rabindranath Tagore, has crossed the 5,000 pages milestone. According to List of Wikisource page, Bengali Wikisource is now at rank 21 among 56 Wikisource based on number of content pages.

The Tamil Wikipedia stall at the World Classical Tamil Conference 2010 in Coimbatore in June 2010.

The uploading of Tamil technical words donated by Tamil Virtual University to the Tamil Wiktionary was completed in October. The words were donated by the Government of Tamil Nadu due to lobbying efforts by Tamil Wikipedians during the runup to the World Classical Tamil Conference 2010 (WCTC) in June. Nearly 70,000 words were uploaded increasing the word count in Tamil Wiktionary from 1,20,000+ to 1,90,000+. This has brought Tamil to the 10th place (from 17) in the list of largest wiktionaries and has earned it a place in the Wiktionary front page logo. In addition, Tamil Wikipedians set up a stall at the WCTC and introduced Tamil Wiki projects to people from all walks of life.

Jimmy Wales introduces the Malayalam Wikipedia CD of 500 selected articles during his key note address at Wikimania 2010 at Gdansk.

The Hindi Wikipedia and its sister wiki projects migrated to the new vector interface on September 1, 2010. In addition, Hindi is the first (and so far the only) Indian language to be incorporated into the WikiBhasha translation and contribution toolkit developed by Microsoft Research.

Malayalam wikimedian Santhosh Thottingal has developed a software (Wiki2CD) for the creation of the Malayalam Wikipedia CD, which was launched in 2010. In addition, Santosh, along with fellow Malayalam wikimedian Shiju Alex coordinated a panel discussion at Wikimania 2010 on creation of offline Wiki content.

Community news

The first meetup in Delhi on 22 September 2010.

Mumbai and Delhi held their first meetups in September, where Wikimedia Board members Barry Newstead and Bishakha Datta met up with Wikipedians and other interested members of the public in these cities. A month later, Hyderabad also held its first meetup.

Arun Ram, Shiju Alex and Barry Newstead releasing the Wikimedia India community newsletter at the nineteenth Bangalore meetup on 24 September 2010.

Wikipedians in Bangalore continued their tradition of meeting up regularly at the Centre for Internet and Society, with the nineteenth meetup in September featuring Barry and Bishaka as attendees, and marking the release of the community newsletter. Along with Delhi and Mumbai, Bangalore is reported to be one of the three cities in contention for the Indian office of the Wikipedia Foundation.

Jimmy Wales speech at the Mumbai Wikipedia Meetup #3 on 31 October 2010. Intro by User:Bishdatta & User:Arunram. (Recorded by User:AshLin.)

Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales had an interaction with Wikipedians followed by a presentation to members of the public at the third Wikipedia meetup in Mumbai on October 31, 2010.

The first Wikimarathon, where Wikipedians and members of the public were encouraged to contribute to Wikimedia projects onsite, was held simultaneously at the meetups in Bangalore and Chennai on November 14, 2010. Wikipedians in Delhi also held a meetup the same day.

The Malayalam Wikipedia held several academies in different parts of Kerala over the past few months.

Wikimedia Foundation board member Bishakha Datta and Indian Wikipedian Srinivas Gunta co-authored a panel presentation at Wikimania 2010 on the Wikimedia Asia Project.

Current proposals and discussions

Please add Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics to your watchlist in order to stay updated with the latest discussions regarding various aspects of the project.

Two current featured articles, 2007 Samjhauta Express bombings and Economy of India have been nominated for reviews here and here respectively. Contribute and help prevent these articles from being delisted!

This interesting discussion on the quality of editing in India-related articles has been underway for on the noticeboard a few days. Feel free to join in and express your opinion.

A series of discussions are underway on the neutrality of the Famine in India article. Please comment and help resolve the disputes.

Join the Wikimedia India mailing list and the IRC channel for regular updates and discussions. Links to language-specific forums are available here.

If you've just joined, add your name to the Members section of Wikipedia:WikiProject India. You'll get a mention in the next issue of the Newsletter and get it delivered as desired. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy!

Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue. Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!

Signed...

SBC-YPR, Sodabottle (Editors)

Tinucherian (Distributor)

This newsletter incorporates content from the WikiMedia India Community Newsletter, September 2010.

Looking forward to more contributions from you!

Although having the newsletter appear on everyone's userpage is desired, this may not be ideal for everyone. If, in the future, you wish to receive a link to the newsletter, rather than the newsletter itself, you may mention it at WikiProject India Outreach Department

This newsletter is automatically delivered by User:Od Mishehu AWB, operated by עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:43, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Chhatri9.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Chhatri9.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:48, 29 November 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:48, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Nathuram_Mirdha.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Nathuram_Mirdha.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:49, 29 November 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:49, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Devilal.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Devilal.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:50, 29 November 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:50, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:GSDhillon2.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:GSDhillon2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:50, 29 November 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:50, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Bandhavgarh.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Bandhavgarh.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:50, 29 November 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:50, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Dr_Natthan_Singh.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Dr_Natthan_Singh.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:51, 29 November 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:51, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Narendra_Budania.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Narendra_Budania.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:51, 29 November 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:51, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rajasthani people

hi! I have expanded Rajasthani people. Please review it. thanks --Onef9day^Talk! 23:04, 5 December 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, LRBurdak. You have new messages at Onef9day's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Merger of Marwaris into Rajasthani people.

Discussion is going on at talk:WikiProject Rajasthan for Merger of Marwaris into Rajasthani people. Please participate. --Onef9day^Talk! 08:23, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Dr Natthan Singh.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Dr Natthan Singh.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —SpacemanSpiff 06:39, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Daulatram Saran.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Daulatram Saran.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Kelly ^hi! 18:06, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brahmand Pujan Article

APPEAL TO YOU Reg: [BRAHMAN PUJAN] , [UNIVERSAL PRAYERS] . written by [Naresh Sonee] On wikipedia , These above two pages are far older than the present article [Brahman] References of above titles are also available on New York site - http://www.printsasia.com/BookDetails.aspx?Id=445813482 Meanwhile, Can your good selves in Wiki Project Indian Community re-create a precise pages on [Naresh Sonee] & his book [Brahmand Pujan] – [Brahmaand Pujan] . However, Sonee is the writer of this book [Brahmand Pujan] written in 1999 . registered with Government of India- HRRD. Details of the registration is provided here on http://brhmaandpujanbook.tripod.com/ . More than sufficient, news and reviews are there on http://brhmaandpujan-news-reviews.tripod.com/ Since 5-6 yrs, for one or the other reason pages of [Naresh Sonee] & [Brahmand Pujan] are faced by communal bias from outside India so these articles over and again get deleted here in Wikipedia for minor reasons. However, many hits of - Naresh Sonee reflects on google search engine also. So, I request Wiki Indian community to kindly come forward and generously help these two pages to grow, as I am fed up to fight my case alone here [left] and moved out long back. Meanwhile, such an important info/issue on ‘Indian literature’ which adds & spell ‘new meaning /dimension’ to Brahman -should it stay lost else ignored? Your community panel has to judge at last. Myself, will not be on Wikipedia, for the same i apologise, but- pls. help these two pages to get reinstalled, reap, sow and grow, if you too feel so, I appeal to do this munificent favour. Regards- Dralansun (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 07:19, 27 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Mahendra Singh Tikait.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Mahendra Singh Tikait.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —SpacemanSpiff 15:09, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Stamp Keshwanand.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Stamp Keshwanand.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —SpacemanSpiff 15:12, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:OP-Chautala.JPG

A tag has been placed on File:OP-Chautala.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —SpacemanSpiff 15:49, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Narendra Budania.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Narendra Budania.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —SpacemanSpiff 15:55, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Kumbharam Arya1.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kumbharam Arya1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --—SpacemanSpiff 16:05, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly help

My articles are being deleted and merged, without contesting. Your help is sought as the topic and the need for articles is important. Thanks in advance. (Mahesh Kumar Yadav (talk) 16:55, 4 May 2011 (UTC)).[reply]

Some articles needing help.

All your articles have been discussed and they are just imitations of existing articles so they have been removed your talk page shows that most of your articles have been flagged for deletion as people have complained about your certain POV against Pakistan all this information has been covered creating articles with blatanly biased headings is a sure way to get them deleted im not sure what LRBurdak can do for you since admins themselves have stated these are biased articles regards Ichigo0987765 (talk) 17:01, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please join the discussion at Talk:Jat people

Hello Sir,

You are one of the Senior editors here on Wikipedia, and definitely an expert on India related articles. Sir, I kindly request Your assistance. Actually, Sikh-History has reverted some of My contributions to the article: Jat people. I have some reasonable doubts and believes that the information should be on the page. I have also shared My views for this. The explaination for the reverts, does not seems to be fair enough. You are quite an experienced One. So, I respectfully ask You to please join the discussion at Section: Experts' Assistance deeply Requested, about the Guidelines of Wikipedia. at Talk:Jat people. For which, I would be grateful to You! Could You also please put some light on the issue under discussion there, as You have a strong grip over India related articles.

Thanks! Sincerely: Abstruce (talk) 17:46, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dharmpal Singh Dudee

The article Dharmpal Singh Dudee has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

BLP that has been unsourced since 2006. No significant coverage found.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Michig (talk) 08:57, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to WikiConference India 2011

Hi LRBurdak,

The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011.
You can see our Official website, the Facebook event and our Scholarship form.

But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach.

As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions.

We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011

Nomination of Bhim Singh Dahiya for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bhim Singh Dahiya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhim Singh Dahiya until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Qwyrxian (talk) 23:56, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Races as described by Megasthenes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Races as described by Megasthenes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Races as described by Megasthenes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sitush (talk) 00:33, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do have a look

Hello Dear Respected Sir,

I have represented My viewpoints on the issue under discussion here. I think You may like to have a look. It's an honor communicating with You. Thanks! --Abstruce ^(Talk) 12:45, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Give me a chance to edit the article

You've been editing the Jat people article for an eternity and have produced nothing but garbage. Please give me a chance to edit the page. I know more about the history of non-elite occupational castes than your condescending post on my talk page seems to suggest. Best regards, Fowler&fowler «Talk» 03:35, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said, you had your moment in the sun (that stretched into years) and you produced delusional hagiography of the Jats. Let me edit the page. All my edits are impeccably sourced and I likely know more about the histories of the peasant castes such as Jat than you will ever guess. Fowler&fowler «Talk» 10:15, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ravi Shankar Godara

The article Ravi Shankar Godara has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not pass WP:BIO or WP:GNG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —SpacemanSpiff 07:52, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Warning October 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jat people. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Please do not remove sourced content. If you don't stop, you could get blocked. Let this be a first warning.

Re Warning October 2011

Dear Fowler and Fowler, there is a saying in Hindi - ulta chor kotwal ko date. As already written to you that you have very limited knowledge about Jats and that is only of British era which carries no meaning. British were biased against Jats and their references can not be taken as reliable references. It has been discussed on Wikipedia at proper forms. So better be constructive and do not write negative things. It is a community edtiting and you do not have monoploly rights. Deletion can be done after proper discussion only. I fear your knowledge about Jat community is obsolete and can be treated as Vandalism. You wrote warning on my page but dare not sign. Be constructive and prove that you have proper knowledge. Do not revert well referenced content which you have done, Which shows your lack of knowledge about this community. It is not a tiller community only though some section of it was during British time.burdak (talk) 04:09, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking etc

I realise that you have been around here for some time but have you ever read WP:OVERLINK or WP:REFPUNC? For that matter, have you ever read up on the various ways of providing decent citations? If you have not then I would recommend that you do so. - Sitush (talk) 16:24, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Maharaja Bhim Singh Rana.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Maharaja Bhim Singh Rana.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 03:30, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Baldev Ram Mirdha1.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Baldev Ram Mirdha1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 03:31, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Swami Keshwanand1.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Swami Keshwanand1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 03:31, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify the above

It is quite obvious that, despite what you may claim, the above three images and many other images of people which you uploaded a few years ago are not in fact "self-created" in the Wikipedia sense. Sure, you may have scanned them (or whatever) but you did not create them. I am not the only person who has voiced some quite serious concerns about a lot of your image uploads, including the "cartoon-style" ones that are simply not suitable for use in biographical articles etc - they're figments of your imagination, often of people who were most likely dead before you were born and in some cases before the camera was around! User:Fowler&fowler has been particularly expressive on the subject.

Please can you spend some time self-reviewing the uploads and arranging deletion of those that are obviously incorrect either in licensing, in sourcing, in plain old reality ... or any mix of those three? Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 03:39, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I can understand bias of people like Fowler&fowler and Sitush who are bent upon to to undo efforts and the content created over last many years on Wikipedia on some heroes who have really done for the society. I have observed what people like Fowler&fowler and Sitush have contributed to Wikipedia. They feel if they are the owners of Wikipedia. I do not have time to waste with such people. Admins should intervene and watch their intensions !!! burdak (talk) 03:59, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:A Jat soldier.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:A Jat soldier.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 04:37, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Tejaji.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Tejaji.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 04:38, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Hoshiar Singh PVC.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Hoshiar Singh PVC.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 04:42, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Gokula.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Gokula.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 04:43, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Dr Vir Singh1.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Dr Vir Singh1.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 16:15, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Dr Vir Singh1.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Dr Vir Singh1.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sitush (talk) 08:27, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have added source and copyright tag. What is needed now ? burdak (talk) 14:38, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well it says that it was photographed by someone else; did they explicitly sign the copyright over to you? Do you have paperwork? If not, it's not your copyright; it's theirs. Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:35, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Barkatullah.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Barkatullah.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 10:27, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rana Udaybhanu Singh.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rana Udaybhanu Singh.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 10:28, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please update Chandrashekar Azad's Pic

The thumbnail of the Chandrashekar Azad has been changed and its getting reflected in the FB as well. Please correct the same on priority . Dhanyavaad Vikram Hathwar — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.240.128.58 (talk) 05:25, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Dr Vir Singh1.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dr Vir Singh1.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —SpacemanSpiff 11:24, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Dharmpal Singh Dudee.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dharmpal Singh Dudee.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —SpacemanSpiff 04:38, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. When you recently edited List of the Mahabharata tribes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bharata (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed link Bharata. Thanks. --burdak (talk) 03:42, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Appropriate article?

Do you really think that List of the Mahabharata tribes is appropriate? Have you ever read WP:PRIMARY? Have you ever considered the issue of transliteration. I can see it being nominated for deletion very soon. In fact, I may do it. - Sitush (talk) 14:48, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject India Tag & Assess 2012 Contest

Hello friends, we are a number of editors from WikiProject India have got together to assess the many thousands of articles under the stewardship of the project, and we'd love to have you, a fellow member, join us. These articles require assessment, that is, the addition of a WikiProject template to the talk page of an article, assessing it for quality and importance and adding a few extra parameters to it.

As of March 11, 2012, 07:00 UTC, WikiProject India has 95,998 articles under its stewardship. Of these 13,980 articles are completely unassessed (both for class and importance) and another 42,415 articles are unassessed for importance only. Accordingly, a Tag & Assess 2012 drive-cum-contest has begun from March 01, 2012 to last till May 31, 2012.

If you are new to assessment, you can learn the minimum about how to evaluate from Part One of the Assessment Guide. Part Two of the Guide will help you learn to employ the full functionality of the talk page template, should you choose to do so.

You can sign up on the Tag & Assess page. There are a number of awards to be given in recognition of your efforts. Come & join us to take part in this exciting new venture. You'll learn more about India in this way.

ssriram_mt (talk) & AshLin (talk) (Drive coordinators)

Delivered per request on Wikipedia:Bot requests. 01:20, 12 March 2012 (UTC) The Helpful Bot 01:20, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bhullar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bhullar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pol430 talk to me 14:37, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Jat (Sangli)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Jat (Sangli). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Jat, Sangli. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Jat, Sangli - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. . Shlok _{talk .} 04:27, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bhambu

The article Bhambu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Seems to fail WP:GNG. Unsourced for a long time & originated at jatland.com, an open wiki. While the word exists as a first name - eg: Bhambu Rai and Bhambu Khan - I am struggling to find any reliable sources for any variant of the spelling being a gotra.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sitush (talk) 07:24, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your perspective would be of value

Hi there. I would appreciate it if you could visit Talk:Muhammad. The article, Muhammad, has changed significantly since it originally passed WP:GA several years ago. It now states in the opening paragraph that Mohammad is the Founder of Islam and has relegated to a note at the end of the article that Muslims, themselves don't believe this. I have started a discussion on the talk page concerning this and would value your input. Thanks so much. Veritycheck (talk) 01:00, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:GSDhillon2.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:GSDhillon2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —SpacemanSpiff 14:11, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image of Col G S Dhillon was taken by me at Shivpuri with my own camera and later on it was scanned and digitized to upload on Wikipedia. It may be used freely by anybody any where. burdak (talk) 02:30, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Sunda clan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Sunda, Khandelwal, Mahesh and Kudan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Karmabai.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Karmabai.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:55, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mansukh Ranwa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mansukh Ranwa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mansukh Ranwa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sitush (talk) 07:43, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bachak

The article Bachak has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of WP:notability. No source currently given, although older version had a source that is not regarded as reliable by WP:IN.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 14:27, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bachak for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bachak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bachak until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. noq (talk) 11:21, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pilania

The article Pilania has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Long term tagged unreferenced. No indication of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TexasAndroid (talk) 16:43, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Glossary of Hinduism

Hi LRBurdak, I changed the position of the word "Mandhatri" at the Glossary of Hinduism terms in order to have the list properly ordered. Regards. --CalaClii (talk) 16:08, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nagaur, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ren (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:00, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Ren - A Village situated in Merta Tehsil of Nagaur district, Rajasthan.

Nomination of Sehrawat for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sehrawat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sehrawat until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sitush (talk) 13:25, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jethoo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jethoo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jethoo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sitush (talk) 11:32, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kajala for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kajala is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kajala until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sitush (talk) 12:02, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tevatia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tevatia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tevatia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Crusoe8181 (talk) 11:53, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kajala

The article Kajala has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Please see User_talk:Dusti#I.27m_confused for a discussion regarding the NAC closure at AfD. The situation is a mess.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sitush (talk) 14:46, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Khoye Maurya

The article Khoye Maurya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced for long enough, nothing at JSTOR, GBooks etc. Basically, yet another LRBurdak stub created years ago based on a passing mention in a list published by an unreliable organisation.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sitush (talk) 16:01, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bachak for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bachak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bachak (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sitush (talk) 21:24, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Sompal.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Sompal.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

copyrighted profile picture taken from website

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. — Bill william compton^Talk 22:38, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dookya

The article Dookya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. I've searched around under all three variant spellings and all I can find is some British Raj mentions of a cave called "Dookya Ghur" that has some connection to Buddhism - we don't have an article for that, creating one based on Raj sources is dodgy & so we cannot redirect. This is probably just another Indian surname.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sitush (talk) 10:08, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bajya

The article Bajya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. It is a name in India, something in Rwanda, an oath and the phrase "barna bajya" = "kingdom of god"/"perfect society" ... but I can find no sources discussing it as a caste community, regardless of the alternate spellings.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sitush (talk) 12:00, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Amarkantak7.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:47, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Amarkantak6.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:49, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Amarkantak3.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:50, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Amarkantak5.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:44, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Amarkantak1.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:50, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Abusaria

The article Abusaria has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:15, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Agre

The article Agre has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:17, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ahlawat

The article Ahlawat has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:18, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ajmeria

The article Ajmeria has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:18, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Attri clan

The article Attri clan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:18, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Andhak

The article Andhak has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:19, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Antal

The article Antal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:20, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aulakh

The article Aulakh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:20, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Balhara

The article Balhara has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:21, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bamraulia

The article Bamraulia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:22, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Balyan

The article Balyan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:22, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bana clan

The article Bana clan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:22, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bargoti

The article Bargoti has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:22, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Barjati

The article Barjati has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:22, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Beniwal

The article Beniwal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:22, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bhadu

The article Bhadu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:23, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bhind clan

The article Bhind clan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:25, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bains clan

The article Bains clan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:25, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bhullar

The article Bhullar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:25, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Budania

The article Budania has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:26, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Budhwar

The article Budhwar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:26, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chahar clan

The article Chahar clan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:26, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cheema

The article Cheema has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:26, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chhillar

The article Chhillar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:27, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chilka

The article Chilka has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:27, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dagur clan

The article Dagur clan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:28, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dahiya

The article Dahiya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:28, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dara clan

The article Dara clan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:28, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Deshwal

The article Deshwal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:28, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Deol

The article Deol has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:28, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dhariwal clan

The article Dhariwal clan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:28, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dhaulya

The article Dhaulya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:28, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dhetarwal

The article Dhetarwal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:30, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dudi

The article Dudi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:32, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Duhoon

The article Duhoon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:32, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gaina

The article Gaina has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:32, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gandhar clan

The article Gandhar clan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:33, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Garhwal clan

The article Garhwal clan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:33, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ghangas

The article Ghangas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:33, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ghasal

The article Ghasal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:33, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Godara clan

The article Godara clan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:33, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gora clan

The article Gora clan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:34, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Goyat

The article Goyat has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:35, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gulia

The article Gulia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:35, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hala clan

The article Hala clan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:35, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hooda

The article Hooda has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:36, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Inania

The article Inania has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:36, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jajra

The article Jajra has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:36, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jaglan

The article Jaglan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:36, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jandu

The article Jandu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:36, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Janmeja

The article Janmeja has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:37, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Janu clan

The article Janu clan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:37, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jewlia

The article Jewlia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:37, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jatri

The article Jatri has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:37, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jhanjhar

The article Jhanjhar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:37, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joon

The article Joon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:37, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kak clan

The article Kak clan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:37, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kadian clan

The article Kadian clan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:38, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kalhan

The article Kalhan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:38, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 2,161: / Line 2,161: @@
 You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Kadian clan|the article's talk page]].
+Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <b style="background:#FEE;padding:5px;font-size:10px">[[User:Eduemoni|<b style="color:#913">Ed</b><b style="color:#C13">ue</b><b style="color:#D35">mo</b><b style="color:#E57">ni</b>]][[User Talk:Eduemoni|<sup style='color:green'>↑talk↓</sup>]]</b> 14:38, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
+== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[Kalhan]] ==
+[[Image:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|48px|]]
+The article [[Kalhan]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32; because of the following concern:
+:'''Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.'''
+While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].
+You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Kalhan|the article's talk page]].
 Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <b style="background:#FEE;padding:5px;font-size:10px">[[User:Eduemoni|<b style="color:#913">Ed</b><b style="color:#C13">ue</b><b style="color:#D35">mo</b><b style="color:#E57">ni</b>]][[User Talk:Eduemoni|<sup style='color:green'>↑talk↓</sup>]]</b> 14:38, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:38, 27 December 2013

Re : Jat Page

Do not delete content from Jat people

Itihaaskar

G.D. KUMAR

Attribution to Jatland

Citations needed in History of Rajasthan

Editing if nagvansh

Why I moved the image of the so-called "Indian Bison"

Image:Parasram Maderna.gif listed for deletion

Notability of Karvir (clan)

Keep

Question?

Chaudhary surname

Burdak question?? Hansarah Jat gotra information?

Gotra Hansarah

Image source problem with Image:Justice Mahavir singh.jpg

Image source problem with Image:Swami Omanand.jpg

Image source problem with Image:Kumbharam Arya1.jpg

Image source problem with Image:Devilal.jpg

{{GFDL-self}} tag

Re: Bhobia

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:288baladitya-and-yashodharma.jpg

Re : Kanswa

White Tiger Picture

WikiProject India Newsletter Volume III, Issue no. 001 - June 2008

Image source problem with Image:Barkatullah.JPG

Possibly unfree Image:Swami Omanand.jpg

Indian leopard

Re:Indian leopard

Guru Hanuman

Thanks

List of the Mahabharata tribes - Roma

Fixed Roma

Roma (city) (रोम)

new article

GREETINGS

Greetings

NowCommons: File:Hathugumpha1.JPG

June 2009

WikiProject India Newsletter, Volume IV, Issue 1 – June 2009

WikiProject India Newsletter, Volume IV, Issue 2 – July 2009

Articles for deletion nomination of Budania

October 2009

copyvio Dharmrajeshwar

FYI

RE: Jandu

Hello: just finished copyedit Maharani Kishori...

Unreferenced BLPs

Suggestion...

AfD nomination of Asiagh

Hello

Proposed deletion of Natthan Singh

New articles

AfD nomination of Natthan Singh

File source problem with File:Gogaji.jpg

bat sun mare

WikiProject India Newsletter Volume V, Issue no. 1 - (June 2010)

Copyright problem

The official notice: Copyright problem: Jat history (1669–1858)

More copyright problems

Copyright problems: clarification

More copyright problems : clarification

Speedy deletion nomination of Jat history (1669-1858)

Speedy deletion nomination of 1669 Jat uprising

Copyright issues

WikiProject India Newsletter Volume V, Issue no. 2 - November 2010

File source problem with File:Chhatri9.jpg

File source problem with File:Nathuram_Mirdha.jpg

File source problem with File:Devilal.jpg

File source problem with File:GSDhillon2.jpg

File source problem with File:Bandhavgarh.jpg

File source problem with File:Dr_Natthan_Singh.jpg

File source problem with File:Narendra_Budania.jpg

Merger of Marwaris into Rajasthani people.

File permission problem with File:Dr Natthan Singh.jpg

Possibly unfree File:Daulatram Saran.jpg

Brahmand Pujan Article

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Mahendra Singh Tikait.jpg

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Stamp Keshwanand.jpg