Jump to content

User talk:Literaturegeek

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by DoctorK88 (talk | contribs) at 19:17, 1 February 2012 (→Nope: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hi. In Moclobemide, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Social phobia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute Resolution

Just to let you know, I am discussing the issue I brought up on the wikiproject:medicine page on the dispute resolution board and I mentioned the point you made so I included your name in who is involved. I just wanted to give you some notice so that you are aware. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DoctorK88 (talk • contribs) 02:11, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the edits you made were incorrect. More than forty-seven countries internationally give DOs full practice rights so your change is a factual inaccuracy as was Hopping's and no consensus was agreed upon regarding DOs vs DO's so those edits were also not warranted. Please refrain from further reverts until consensus is reached and these disputes are fully resolved. Thanks in advance. DoctorK88 (talk) 04:21, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DRN Notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Osteopathic Medicine in the United States". Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DoctorK88 (talk • contribs) 02:24, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I replied. Have a good day. Psychiatrick (talk) 15:08, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could you restore the text deleted by Dialectric? The text has been based on the journal World Psychiatry. There is the archive of World Psychiatry published by the World Psychiatric Association. So it is a reliable source. I’m sorry if I’ve offended you. --Psychiatrick (talk) 20:38, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, sorry, because the psychiatry article is meant to be a general over view as it is such a large topic area. There is already quite a lot of material which is negative towards psychiatry in the main psychiatry article. Adding more and more paragraphs of critical content risks giving WP:UNDUE weight to certain viewpoints. As stated content additions to the main psychiatry article should in general be brief summaries of important points as it is a very large topic area. If that text was to go anywhere on wikipedia, I would suggest it may be of relevance in critical psychiatry.--Literaturegeek | T@1k? 15:07, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and thank you for my cookie. It tasted nice. :)--Literaturegeek | T@1k? 15:08, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nope

I think I was very civil and quite reasonable despite not receiving the same treatment. Some of your comments had an abrupt and unfriendly tone about them. DoctorK88 (talk) 19:17, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Literaturegeek&oldid=474444782"