Jump to content

User talk:Rrodic

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rrodic (talk | contribs) at 03:22, 20 December 2012 (→Blocked: reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. dci | TALK 01:40, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Tiderolls 02:25, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot block me without any valid reason. If I get unblocked, I will block you because you are abusing your editing privileges--Rrodic (talk) 02:28, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

HOW DO I GET UNBLOCKED?--Rrodic (talk) 02:28, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to abuse your appealing privileges, you talk page will be subsequently blocked. Please stop. hmssolent\Let's convene 02:31, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe (this is just a wild guess), if you tried reading the directions on the block template, and tried using the unblock template they suggest, providing a proper reason as discussed in the linked guide to appealing blocks and give someone a reason to believe that you'll be of any use to the site, you might be unblocked. Could be completely wrong, though. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:36, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't even know him. He blocked me before I could block him. He must be a vandal. I cannot edit your(hmssolent\Let's convene) talk page because I am blocked. Please help me get unblocked--Rrodic (talk) 02:39, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Have you tried reading the directions on the block template? A good editor who wasn't a troll would do that. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:41, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Rrodic (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I haven't commited vandalism. I am not a troll.Rrodic (talk) 02:43, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I haven't commited vandalism. I am not a troll.[[User:Rrodic|Rrodic]] ([[User talk:Rrodic#top|talk]]) 02:43, 20 December 2012 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I haven't commited vandalism. I am not a troll.[[User:Rrodic|Rrodic]] ([[User talk:Rrodic#top|talk]]) 02:43, 20 December 2012 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I haven't commited vandalism. I am not a troll.[[User:Rrodic|Rrodic]] ([[User talk:Rrodic#top|talk]]) 02:43, 20 December 2012 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Try requesting being unblocked that addresses the actual reason you were blocked. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:44, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict)Accusing an admin in good standing of being a vandal without providing any evidence? Failing to address the fact that multiple people were pretty sure you're a sockpuppet of a previously blocked user? Failing to address that more than one editor openly said you're a troll account? ...Yeah, sure, you're done. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:49, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • First you guys blocked me without a reason, now you guys are accusing me of sockpuppetry, which is very legal by the way. You guys must be sockpuppets
  • Well, there must be a way to take the block off this account, I am checking..... After I take the block off This account, I will block you first

Welcome!

Hello, Rrodic, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Rrodic (talk) 02:48, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing admins

Please see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Recent_edits_made_by_Rrodic. Tiderolls 02:48, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Rrodic. You have new messages at Rrodic's talk page.
Message added 02:48, 20 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Rrodic (talk) 02:48, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Hi Rrodic. The following links might be useful if you are considering appealing your block. I'm not sure how likely it is that you'll be accepted, given your recent contribs, but taking a look could help.

I'd strongly encourage you, if your request is accepted, to engage in more constructive editing. As for adminship, look over WP:NOTNOW. Given current circumstances, an RfA is almost bound to fail. dci | TALK 02:49, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Rrodic. You have new messages at DCI2026's talk page.
Message added 03:03, 20 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Thanks Rrodic (talk) 03:03, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rrodic&oldid=528902151"