Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashley Storrie

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lloyd Wood (talk | contribs) at 00:49, 8 November 2024 (keep). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Ashley Storrie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to meet GNG. None of the article's current sources contribute to notability, all being interviews, promotional pieces about the subject's work, or passing mentions. I was unable to find any independent significant coverage in a BEFORE search. Perhaps a small amount of the content could be merged into her mother's page (Janey Godley) but most of it is off-topic there. CodeTalker (talk) 22:40, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a source assessment table of the article's current sources.
Source assessment table: prepared by User:CodeTalker
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/15442369.ashley-storrie-daughter-comedy-legend---taking-game No Source is an interview with the subject Yes Yes No
https://list.co.uk/news/10027/interview-ashley-storrie-i-have-been-known-to-go-a-bit-tonto No Source is an interview with the subject Yes ~ No
https://www.glasgowtimes.co.uk/news/15443896.ashley-storrie-on-being-the-daughter-of-a-comedy-legend-and-taking-her-on-at-her-own-game/ No Source is an interview with the subject Yes Yes No
https://www.theguardian.com/culture/1999/aug/16/artsfeatures1 ~ Source is mostly quotes from the subject, with a few sentences of analysis Yes ~ ~ Partial
https://cmmanagement.co.uk/talent/ashley-storrie/ No Source appears to be a blurb from the subject's management company No No No
https://www.glasgowlive.co.uk/news/glasgow-news/meet-tanya-potter-harrys-long-12110480 Yes Yes No Source is a short review of a video produced by the subject No
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m00037wr ~ Yes No Source is a promotional page about a show that the subject appears in No
https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/17765419.scotlands-best-talent-celebrates-latest-herald-culture-awards/ Yes Yes No Source is an article about an award won by the subject as well as by others; contains a mere mention of the subject's name No
https://www.chortle.co.uk/news/2020/09/23/46953/2020_scottish_comedy_award_winners_revealed Yes Yes No Source is an article about an award won by the subject as well as by others; contains a mere mention of the subject's name No
https://www.sundaypost.com/fp/comedian-ashley-storrie/ ~ Source is largely based on an interview, contains a small amount of analysis Yes ~ ~ Partial
https://sundaypost.com/fp/ashley-storrie-dinosaur/ ~ Source is largely based on an interview, contains a small amount of analysis Yes ~ ~ Partial
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m001gx7g ~ Yes No Source is a promotional page about a show that the subject appears in No
https://dabsterproductions.com/projects/ashley-storrie/ ~ Yes No Source is a promotional page about a show that the subject appears in No
https://www.chortle.co.uk/news/2024/10/02/56719/four_scottish_bafta_nods_for_ashley_storrie%E2%80%99s_dinosaur Yes Yes No Source is about an award won by a show that the subject appears in No
https://thinkingautismguide.com/2024/04/talking-with-dinosaur-star-and-co-creator-ashley-storrie.html No Source is an interview with the subject Yes Yes No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

CodeTalker (talk) 22:42, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The subject of the article is notable, and has been in the public eye with cocomitant media attention for decades. Youngest Edinburgh Fringe performer with her own show, BBC presenter, co-creator and star of a BBC television show. The article should be retained.
@CodeTalker has admitted on the article talk page to not knowing who the subject is -- all the other editors of the page at least know that -- and the amount of effort he (it just has to be a he) is expending here is concerning. Lloyd Wood (talk) 23:11, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The article was originally a redirect to Godley's page. Part of why I never actually finished drafting the article was because pretty much everything I was finding was interviews and the likes. Also @Lloyd Wood:, please bear in mind WP:CANVASS. Posting heavily-worded comments on other Wikipedias as ye did here tends to be frowned upon CiphriusKane (talk) 23:35, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete based on source analysis. Her being the youngest Edinburgh fringe performer (what an obscure claim to notability), alongside hosting a BBC tv show does not create notability, sourcing does. Also @Llyod Wood I advise you to keep discussion focused on the subject and her notability. Traumnovelle (talk) 00:15, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, the table indicates three sources which the nom has grudgingly labelled 'partial' when it appears to be 'yes', has dismissed three as non-independent due to containing content of an interview but are actually standard articles focused purely on the subject over which she presumably had no editorial control, and has misrepresented one on 'an award won by a show that the subject appears in', it was actually a nomination but in fact three nominations as writer, actor and for the show itself. Crowsus (talk) 00:40, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Edinburgh Fringe example was just to show that the subject has been in the public eye for decades. The subject has hosted multiple BBC radio shows and has starred in multiple BBC television and radio shows, so @Traumnovelle's description was misleading. Speaking of accuracy, @Traumnovelle do note your typo of my name. Lloyd Wood (talk) 00:49, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]