Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baldwin Class 12-32 ¼ E
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 08:01, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Baldwin Class 12-32 ¼ E (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The only source I could find which discusses the subject in depth is https://locomotive.fandom.com/wiki/Baldwin_Class_12-32_%C2%BC_E which is not a reliable source. References in the article do not discuss the subject in depth. TarnishedPathtalk 08:12, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. TarnishedPathtalk 08:12, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. TarnishedPathtalk 08:57, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: It's probably covered in a specialist book about the company, but this is likely too niche to get an article here. I don't find any coverage in Gbooks. I've got some locomotive encyclopedias I use, but this isn't in them either. Oaktree b (talk) 15:39, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.