Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duquesne Family Office: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Meatsgains (talk | contribs) →Duquesne Family Office: reply |
cmt |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
**Which sources? Is there [[WP:SIGCOV|''significant'' coverage]]? [[User:James Allison|James]] (<sup>[[User talk:James Allison|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/James Allison|contribs]]</sub>) 20:17, 8 January 2018 (UTC) |
**Which sources? Is there [[WP:SIGCOV|''significant'' coverage]]? [[User:James Allison|James]] (<sup>[[User talk:James Allison|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/James Allison|contribs]]</sub>) 20:17, 8 January 2018 (UTC) |
||
:::All of the page's current references are reliable and [http://marketrealist.com/2016/08/assessing-duquesne-family-office-llc-holdings-second-quarter this one] details the firm. In regard to significant coverage, [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Duquesne+Family+Office%22&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjr0KjU6snYAhWr6YMKHZztBqsQ_AUICigB&biw=1653&bih=871 1200+] ghits. Most coverage is on recent investments but the news articles still cover Duquesne. [[User:Meatsgains|Meatsgains]] ([[User talk:Meatsgains|talk]]) 02:31, 9 January 2018 (UTC) |
:::All of the page's current references are reliable and [http://marketrealist.com/2016/08/assessing-duquesne-family-office-llc-holdings-second-quarter this one] details the firm. In regard to significant coverage, [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Duquesne+Family+Office%22&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjr0KjU6snYAhWr6YMKHZztBqsQ_AUICigB&biw=1653&bih=871 1200+] ghits. Most coverage is on recent investments but the news articles still cover Duquesne. [[User:Meatsgains|Meatsgains]] ([[User talk:Meatsgains|talk]]) 02:31, 9 January 2018 (UTC) |
||
::::Significant coverage refers to the substance of the coverage, not the amount of mentions. [[User:James Allison|James]] (<sup>[[User talk:James Allison|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/James Allison|contribs]]</sub>) 12:30, 9 January 2018 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 12:30, 9 January 2018
- Duquesne Family Office (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not enough coverage in reliable independent sources to satisfy CORPDEPTH or GNG. James (talk/contribs) 13:52, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:55, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:55, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete -- just a directory listing based on routine corporate announcements. No encyclopedically relevant prose. Does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. Private funds are a dime a dozen, and this one misses the mark. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:30, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - Subject is covered in enough reliable sources to establish notability. Meatsgains (talk) 01:37, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- Which sources? Is there significant coverage? James (talk/contribs) 20:17, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- All of the page's current references are reliable and this one details the firm. In regard to significant coverage, 1200+ ghits. Most coverage is on recent investments but the news articles still cover Duquesne. Meatsgains (talk) 02:31, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
- Significant coverage refers to the substance of the coverage, not the amount of mentions. James (talk/contribs) 12:30, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
- All of the page's current references are reliable and this one details the firm. In regard to significant coverage, 1200+ ghits. Most coverage is on recent investments but the news articles still cover Duquesne. Meatsgains (talk) 02:31, 9 January 2018 (UTC)