Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duquesne Family Office

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:19, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Duquesne Family Office

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough coverage in reliable independent sources to satisfy CORPDEPTH or GNG. James (^talk/_contribs) 13:52, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:55, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:55, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- just a directory listing based on routine corporate announcements. No encyclopedically relevant prose. Does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. Private funds are a dime a dozen, and this one misses the mark. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:30, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Subject is covered in enough reliable sources to establish notability. Meatsgains (talk) 01:37, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Which sources? Is there significant coverage? James (^talk/_contribs) 20:17, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All of the page's current references are reliable and this one details the firm. In regard to significant coverage, 1200+ ghits. Most coverage is on recent investments but the news articles still cover Duquesne. Meatsgains (talk) 02:31, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Significant coverage refers to the substance of the coverage, not the amount of mentions. James (^talk/_contribs) 12:30, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:20, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No indications of notability, most mentions in relation to the notability of the firms being invested in, notability is not inherited. References are not intellectually independent - mainly PRIMARY sources, normal business announcements and/or relying on company announcements, references fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. Topic fails GNG. HighKing⁺⁺ 12:32, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.