Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guillaume de Ramel: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
Malcolmxl5 (talk | contribs) →Guillaume de Ramel: Closed as delete (XFDcloser) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed archived" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' |
|||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}} |
|||
<!--Template:Afd top |
|||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> |
|||
The result was '''delete'''. [[User:Malcolmxl5|Malcolmxl5]] ([[User talk:Malcolmxl5|talk]]) 23:09, 29 October 2022 (UTC) |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> |
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> |
||
:{{la|1=Guillaume de Ramel}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guillaume de Ramel|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 October 22#{{anchorencode:Guillaume de Ramel}}|View log]]</noinclude> | [[Special:Diff/1117662493/cur|edits since nomination]]) |
:{{la|1=Guillaume de Ramel}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guillaume de Ramel|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 October 22#{{anchorencode:Guillaume de Ramel}}|View log]]</noinclude> | [[Special:Diff/1117662493/cur|edits since nomination]]) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 15: | ||
*'''Delete''' per Bearcat. Definitely fails NPOL as someone who's candidacy never even reach a general election, let alone being elected to a significant office. Best, [[User:GPL93|GPL93]] ([[User_talk:GPL93|talk]]) 13:45, 28 October 2022 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' per Bearcat. Definitely fails NPOL as someone who's candidacy never even reach a general election, let alone being elected to a significant office. Best, [[User:GPL93|GPL93]] ([[User_talk:GPL93|talk]]) 13:45, 28 October 2022 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''': Not notable and unelected politician. [[User:Contributor008|Contributor008]] ([[User talk:Contributor008|talk]]) 17:31, 29 October 2022 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''': Not notable and unelected politician. [[User:Contributor008|Contributor008]] ([[User talk:Contributor008|talk]]) 17:31, 29 October 2022 (UTC) |
||
{{clear}} |
|||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |
|||
Latest revision as of 23:09, 29 October 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:09, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Guillaume de Ramel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NPOL, non-notable, article filled with self-promotion and puffery Bangabandhu (talk) 23:05, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Politicians, and Rhode Island. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 07:33, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. People do not get Wikipedia articles for standing as candidates in elections they didn't win — the notability bar for politicians is holding a notable office, not just running for one, but this is failing to properly establish that he had preexisting notability for other reasons independently of unsuccessful candidacies. The content about his prior career is referenced almost entirely to primary sources and glancing namechecks of his existence in news articles that aren't about him, none of which is support for notability at all. Bearcat (talk) 13:06, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per Bearcat. Definitely fails NPOL as someone who's candidacy never even reach a general election, let alone being elected to a significant office. Best, GPL93 (talk) 13:45, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Not notable and unelected politician. Contributor008 (talk) 17:31, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.