Wikipedia:Peer review/Al-Arqam/archive1
| Toolbox |
|---|
I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to get more feedback on how to further improve this before I submit for GA. Thanks, DrunkenJoe (talk) 05:21, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
Airship
[edit]As requested, I'll review this article with a potential GA nomination in mind.
- As it stands, this article will not pass GA. The most egregious concern is sourcing. For GA, every statement needs to be verified with an inline citation. I have tagged multiple passages where this is not the case. If you are so inclined, you could also simplify the Kamarulnizam references using {{sfn}}s. Much of the infobox is also not verified.
- There is also MOS:OVERSECTION. Currently, there are eight section headers before "See Also". I do not see a reason for there to be more than three: "History", composed of "Origins", "Sungai Penchala and expansion", and "Challenges and crackdown"; "Organisation", consisting of "Membership and structure" and "Economic philosophy (Arqamomics)", and "Revival efforts", with the two subheadings currently present removed.
- The lead should summarise the article. Instead, there are several details there not contained within the article, for example the "Ikhwan Polygamy Club and Obedient Wives Club", that the members were arrested in Thailand under the Internal Security Act, that they were deported, and much else.
- Ashaari Muhammad indicates that he later renounced his views. Such details should be included in the article, which as it stands is very barebones.
- A WP:SEEALSO section should only contain links not already within the article. Both links are already in the article, so the section should be removed. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:57, 31 October 2024 (UTC)