Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests

If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request technical help below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "The/This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."

To list a technical request: edit the Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:
```
{{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}
```
This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.
If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page.

Add a new request

Remove all requests

Technical requests

Uncontroversial technical requests

Portal:Calvinism (currently a redirect to Portal:Reformed Christianity) → Portal:Reformed Christianity (move · discuss) – The mainspace article for this was moved last week: Talk:Reformed Christianity#Requested move 28 March 2024. WP:MOVEPORTAL says to come here to request the move. JFHutson (talk) 13:29, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Catechetical School of Alexandria (currently a redirect to School of Alexandria) → School of Alexandria (move · discuss) – This is how it is normally referred to: https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Catechetical+School+of+Alexandria%2CSchool+of+Alexandria&year_start=1800&year_end=2019&corpus=en-2019&smoothing=3. Also see https://www.britannica.com/topic/School-of-Alexandria Pogenplain (talk) 07:19, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Catechetical School of Antioch (currently a redirect to School of Antioch) → School of Antioch (move · discuss) – This is how it is normally if not always referred to: https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Catechetical+School+of+Antioch%2CSchool+of+Antioch&year_start=1800&year_end=2019&corpus=en-2019&smoothing=3. Also see https://www.britannica.com/topic/School-of-Antioch Pogenplain (talk) 07:19, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Passbolt is invalid. Must create Passbolt before requesting that it be moved to Draft:Passbolt.– User:Wikiartifex disclosed a COI, so the page needs to go through AfC. Broc (talk) 08:07, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requests to revert undiscussed moves

React (software) → React (JavaScript library) (currently a redirect back to React (software)) (move · discuss) – Undiscussed move. Previous moves were discussed on the talk page first. Northern Moonlight 02:52, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Northern Moonlight is there any restrictions you faced when moving the article back? – robertsky (talk) 07:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ugh, there isn’t. Thanks for the reminder. Northern Moonlight 08:56, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Contested technical requests

MRT Line 5 (Dhaka Metro Rail) (currently a redirect to MRT Line 5) → MRT Line 5 (move · discuss) – since there is another mrt line 5 there is no need for the clarificaion of the transit system Uss157 (talk) 04:06, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is a case similar to UK parliamentary constituencies where I think a disaambuator may be good for consistency and clarity even if its not strictly necessary in this case. The manila metro also has MRT lines, so saying which each one is aids recognition. — Amakuru (talk) 08:14, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Navajo Wars → Navajo wars (currently a redirect back to Navajo Wars) (move · discuss) – Per WP:AT and MOS:CAPS - not consistently capped in sources per JSTOR and google scholar. Cinderella157 (talk) 01:46, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As with the Apache wars below, the capped form is heavily favoured in sources.[1] And forget Google Scholar we don't use that in such discussions. — Amakuru (talk) 08:05, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Apache Wars → Apache wars (currently a redirect back to Apache Wars) (move · discuss) – Per WP:AT and MOS:CAPS - not consistently capped in sources per JSTOR and google scholar. Cinderella157 (talk) 01:34, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This one isn't necessarily clear cut. Unusually, Sources have been trending away from the lowercase version recently, and it's probably about on the border of whether it's "consistently capitalised in a siginifacnt majority of sources" at present.[2] Also, we never use Google scholar for assessing titles, we're a general encyclopedia not a specialist organ. — Amakuru (talk) 08:03, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps you never use Google Scholar in RMs. Books are not the only reliable independent sources. SilverLocust 💬 08:32, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, they're not the only ones, but in assessing common name, you need an objective sampling of the literature as a whole. Books gives you a reasonable guesstimate at that, while scholar results, which are very narrow, tell you nothing. Hence they're not used at RMs, while ngrams are. — Amakuru (talk) 23:40, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Arguing that people shouldn't use Google Scholar doesn't support the claim that "we never" use scholar. Google Ngrams is used much more often, but JSTOR and Google Scholar are two things that people sometimes look at in RMs in order to consider usage in journals (though you may prefer otherwise). "Discussions about article titles commonly look at additional off-site sourcing, such as frequency of usage in news publications, books, and journals." WP:AT. SilverLocust 💬 07:59, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Mainland Travel Permit for Hong Kong and Macao Residents (currently a redirect to Mainland Travel Permit for Hong Kong and Macao Resident) → Mainland Travel Permit for Hong Kong and Macau Residents (currently a redirect instead to Mainland Travel Permit for Hong Kong and Macao Resident) (move · discuss) – Articles relating to Macau/Macao have been extremely confusingly titled on Wikipedia, most (non-company) articles makes more sense with the "Macau" spelling because that is simply the more common English language name (and is on >50% of Wikipedia articles anyway) so I believe this article is no exception and it fits better being renamed to Macau rather than its current title of Macao Josethewikier (talk) 09:29, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The fact that there is a mixture of spelling on Wikipedia is evidence that there is disagreement about it, which is evident in prior RMs and Talk page discussions for Macau. Ngram analysis disagrees with your assertion that "Macau" is the more popular spelling in English. The desire to improve consistency, while a laudable goal, does not seem completely uncontroversial. Apparently the official government spelling in English is "Macao", and this article is about a document issued by the government, so perhaps its title should retain the government's official spelling.
A similar document with an associated article recently moved by the nominator is shown here, and the name of the document is written in English on its cover, and clearly uses the government official spelling, so an article about the document should probably not casually differ from the title of the document itself.
The nominator has been making a lot of bold moves and spelling changes – sometimes with misleading edit summaries. For example, they renamed an article and changed the spelling in the article about a Canadian government office in a way that is contrary to the way the Canadian government spells the name of its own office in English!
—⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 20:22, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yakuza (franchise) → Like a Dragon (franchise) (currently a redirect back to Yakuza (franchise)) (move · discuss) – The current name Thatonebowserfan (talk) 20:46, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not uncontroversial, see this failed RM attempting the same move ASUKITE 20:47, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Thatonebowserfan; this technical request has been contested and thus requires a formal Requested Move discussion. You can start one by clicking "discuss" in your request. You can remove this request after opening a discussion (or if you do not want to continue). Sennecaster (Chat) 14:38, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Shake Your Moneymaker (song) → Shake Your Moneymaker (move · discuss) – Per WP:SMALLDIFFS, as this is the only item at the dab page without a space between "Money" and "Maker" Mach61 20:42, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral on this, but the above reason better justifies moving the dab to Shake Your Money Maker [than moving the song to the base page name]. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 21:54, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Rotideypoc41352 even if the dab were moved the song should still be moved over the redirect to the dab. Mach61 22:33, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per Shake Your Moneymaker (song), the song has been released as both "Shake Your Moneymaker" and "Shake Your Money Maker". Insufficient disambiguation. 162 etc. (talk) 22:32, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Liubymivka, Rovenky Raion, Luhansk Oblast → Liubymivka, Luhansk Oblast (currently a redirect back to Liubymivka, Rovenky Raion, Luhansk Oblast) (move · discuss) – No other settlements named Liubymivka in Luhansk Oblast. Similar situation to my previous request involving Teple. HappyWith (talk) 09:07, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@HappyWithWhatYouHaveToBeHappyWith: Looking at the history of this article, it appears that it has been titled Dzerzhynskyi for most of its existence, and has only been named Liubymivka for a few days; a previous move to a similar title was reverted last October. This history suggests to me that this is a potentially controversial move, so I recommend starting a full RM for this proposal. You can begin one by clicking the "discuss" link in your request. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 13:37, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Gotcha. I also noticed now that the original mover has been warned and told to revert their moves in this topic; I suspect the page will be moved back to Dzerzhynskyi soon anyway, so probably no point in starting an RM. Feel free to remove this request to free up space. HappyWith (talk) 08:24, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator needed