Inheritance (Munch)
| Inheritance | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Artist | Edvard Munch |
| Year | 1897–1899 |
| Medium | Oil on canvas |
| Dimensions | 141 cm × 120 cm (56 in × 47 in) |
| Location | Munch Museum, Oslo |
Inheritance (Norwegian: Arv; 1897–1899) is an oil painting on canvas created by the Norwegian painter Edvard Munch (1863–1944). It depicts a mother with syphilis holding her baby, who is affected by congenital syphilis. Munch completed the work after visiting the Hôpital Saint-Louis in Paris, where he saw a woman crying for her child with the disease.
The baby in the painting is lifeless, pale and covered in spots. The mother, whose hands and patterned skirt are especially prominent, has a tearful red face and sits on a bench in front of a green background.
The critical response to the painting was one of surprise; discussing sexually transmitted disease in public was unacceptable at the time. In addition, the artist had portrayed a distortion of the traditional artistic subject of the Madonna and Child.[1]
Background
[edit]Edvard Munch was a Norwegian artist whose mother, sister and paternal grandfather had been affected by tuberculosis.[2] Munch completed an oil painting on canvas in the late 1890s based on what he witnessed during a visit to the Hôpital Saint-Louis in Paris, one of three hospitals in that city that took in people with syphilis.[1] In its museum his attention was drawn to a wax model of a baby with congenital syphilis.[1] He also saw a woman crying for her child with venereal disease.[1] The painting is known as Inheritance.[2][a] The first version was titled The Syphilitic Child.[4]
The painting
[edit]
The work is housed at the Munch Museum, in Oslo, Norway.[5] It measures 141 cm by 120 cm.[5]
The painting depicts a baby affected by congenital syphilis lying in the arms of its mother, who sits on a bench in front of a green background.[2][4] The infant is portrayed as lifeless, pale, yellow, and covered in spots.[2] Its body parts are out of proportion and the eyes wide open.[4] The mother's hands and patterned skirt are specifically prominent.[6] She is crying and has a red face.[6] Her jacket is plain black and there is a bright red feather in her hat.[6] Munch stated he saw a woman "crying in the hospital of venereal disease", but does not clarify whether the syphilitic woman in the painting transmitted syphilis to her baby via an unfaithful husband or from her own sex work.[6]
Munch
[edit]Munch's own description of the image was as follows:[4]
The woman bends over the child which is infected by the sins of the fathers. It lies in the lap of the mother. The mother bends over it and weeps so that her face becomes scarlet red. The red, tear-swollen, distorted face contrasts strongly with the linen white face of the child and the green background. The child stares with big, deep eyes at a world into which it has come involuntarily. Sick, anxious, and questioning does it look out into the room, wondering about the land of agony into which it has entered, asking, already. Why—why?
Munch was at the time affected by a decline in his mental health.[4] Like the baby in the image he felt that he too had entered the world in a sick state.[4]
Reception
[edit]The reaction to the painting in the late nineteenth century was one of surprise.[1] Discussing sexually transmitted disease in public was unacceptable at the time on moral grounds.[1] It has been described as shocking even in the 21st century.[6] In addition, the artist had portrayed an inversion of the traditional artistic subject of the Madonna and Child.[1]
See also
[edit]Notes
[edit]- ^ Nineteenth-century physicians believed that congenital syphilis, then called hereditary syphilis, was acquired from semen ("semen inheritance") at the time of conception, and that the unborn baby then transmitted it to the mother via the placenta. This false theory was used to explain why the mother was typically without symptoms until after childbirth. Tests for syphilis were not developed until 1906 and it was later found that treating a pregnant woman for syphilis prevented congenital syphilis in her baby.[1][3]
References
[edit]- ^ a b c d e f g h Perciaccante, Antonio; Coralli, Alessia (1 March 2018). "The History of Congenital Syphilis Behind The Inheritance by Edvard Munch". JAMA Dermatology. 154 (3): 280. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.5834. ISSN 2168-6068. PMID 29541782. Archived from the original on 10 May 2023. Retrieved 10 May 2023.
The portrait's title is very interesting . It's a reminder that, in the 1890s, syphilis in neonates was assumed to be an hereditary disease.
- ^ a b c d Ravenal, John B. (2016). "Sea change: Illness and mortality". Jasper Johns and Edvard Munch: Inspiration and Transformation. Yale University Press. p. 79. ISBN 978-0-300-22006-3. Archived from the original on 11 May 2023. Retrieved 11 May 2023.
- ^ Oriel, J. David (2012). "5. "The sins of the fathers": Congenital syphilis". The Scars of Venus: A History of Venereology. London: Springer-Verlag. pp. 69–70. ISBN 978-1-4471-2068-1. Archived from the original on 30 June 2023. Retrieved 10 May 2023.
- ^ a b c d e f Cernuschi, Claude (2001). "Sex and psyche, nature and nurture, the personal and the political: Edvard Munch and German expressionism". In Howe, Jeffery W. (ed.). Edvard Munch: psyche, symbol and expression. Chestnut Hill, MA : Boston College, McMullen Museum of Art [Chicago]: Distributed by the University of Chicago Press. p. 126. ISBN 978-1-892850-02-7.
- ^ a b "Edvard Munch | Inheritance". The Metropolitan Museum of Art. Archived from the original on 10 May 2023. Retrieved 10 May 2023.
- ^ a b c d e Cordulack, Shelley Wood (2002). "8. The physiology of inherited disease, death and immortality". Edvard Munch and the Physiology of Symbolism. Massachusetts: Rosemont Publishing and Printing Corp. p. 91. ISBN 978-0-8386-3891-0. Archived from the original on 10 May 2023. Retrieved 10 May 2023.