Edit filter log

'==Welcome!== [[Image:Chocolate chip cookies.jpg|thumb|300px|Some cookies to welcome you! [[File:Face-smile.svg|25px]]]] [[Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia|Welcome to Wikipedia]], Dev0745! Thank you for [[Special:Contributions/Dev0745|your contributions]]. I am [[User:K6ka|K6ka]] and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on [[User talk:K6ka|my talk page]]. You can also check out [[Wikipedia:Questions]] or type {{tlx|help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: * [[Wikipedia:Introduction|Introduction]] * [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|The five pillars of Wikipedia]] * [[Help:Editing|How to edit a page]] * [[Help:Contents|Help pages]] * [[Wikipedia:Article development|How to write a great article]] * [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost|Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community]] Also, when you post on [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk pages]] you should [[Wikipedia:Signatures|sign your name]] using four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a [[Wikipedia:Wikipedians|Wikipedian]]! —[[User:K6ka|'''<span style="color:#0040FF">k6ka</span>''']] <span title="Canadian!" style="color:red">🍁</span> ([[User talk:K6ka|<span style="color:#0080FF">Talk</span>]] · [[Special:Contributions/K6ka|<span style="color:#0B4C5F">Contributions</span>]]) 17:49, 19 December 2017 (UTC) Thanks, - ([[User:Dev0745|Dev0745]] ([[User talk:Dev0745#top|talk]]) 15:10, 19 October 2018 (UTC)) ==Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction== {{Ivmbox |2=Commons-emblem-hand.svg |imagesize=50px |1=The following sanction now applies to you: {{Talkquote|1=[[WP:TBAN|Topic-banned]] from all pages and discussions related to [[Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019]], including the associated protests}} You have been sanctioned for continued [[WP:POV|POV]], [[WP:TE|tendentious]] and [[WP:DE|disruptive editing]] in this topic-area, despite prior warnings. This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Involved admins|uninvolved administrator]] under the authority of the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]]'s decision at [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision]] and, if applicable, the procedure described at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions]]. This sanction has been recorded in the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions/Log/2020|log of sanctions]]. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the [[Wikipedia:Banning policy|banning policy]] to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions. You may appeal this sanction using the process described [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Appeals and modifications|here]]. I recommend that you use the [[Template:Arbitration enforcement appeal#Usage|arbitration enforcement appeals template]] if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard.&nbsp;Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you.<!-- Template:AE sanction.--> [[User:El_C|El_C]] 14:15, 6 March 2020 (UTC) }} == ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message == <table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;"> <tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2021|2021 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2021#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2021/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small> </td></tr> </table> <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/07&oldid=1056563443 --> == People of Assam == I have reverted your [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=People_of_Assam&type=revision&diff=1119930801&oldid=1117029724 recent edits] because the cited sources says the Baganiya language is different from the Nagpuri language. Please do not keep inserting this POV. [[User:Chaipau|Chaipau]] ([[User talk:Chaipau|talk]]) 15:00, 4 November 2022 (UTC) {{Ping|Chaipau}}, I reverted you edit and replaced Assam Sadri in place of Sadri as Sadri language of Assam known as Assam Sadri and Bagania. Sources not mention Adivasia. Sadri is language of Sadan, the non-tribals people of Jharkhand not tribal so calling it as Adivasia is nothing but Propaganda of tribals of tea garden. [[User:Dev0745|Dev0745]] ([[User talk:Dev0745#top|talk]]) 15:57, 4 November 2022 (UTC) :Sorry, we just go by WP:RS. If a source says something, we go by it. Wikipedia is not the place to correct the propaganda of the tea garden tribals or anyone else. [[User:Chaipau|Chaipau]] ([[User talk:Chaipau|talk]]) 16:13, 4 November 2022 (UTC) Can you provide where it is mentioned the Assam Sadri is called Adivasia. Also as per my knowledge scholar have called it Assam Sadri or Bagania not Adivasia. [[User:Dev0745|Dev0745]] ([[User talk:Dev0745#top|talk]]) 16:22, 4 November 2022 (UTC) ==Nagpuria people== Why you are trying to turn [[Nagpuria people]] into a poorly written "History of India"-type article?[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nagpuria_people&diff=1121613246&oldid=1121612691] You have been doing this since 2018 and you were told then too,[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nagpuria_people&diff=863189690&oldid=863189530][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nagpuria_people&diff=863189812&oldid=863189766] that your edits are not relevant to "Nagpuria people". Why you keep adding them back? There is a talk page discussion where you never responded: [[Talk:Nagpuria_people#Focus]]. Your text is either unsourced or irrelevant or misrepresents sources. Even your most recent addition to his page[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nagpuria_people&type=revision&diff=1121612117&oldid=1121604483] is irrelevant because it is unrelated to this subject. The source does not mention "Nagpuria" anywhere.[https://www.academia.edu/730314/The_Copper_Hoards_of_the_Indian_Subcontinent._Preliminaries_for_an_Interpretation] [[User:Dympies|Dympies]] ([[User talk:Dympies|talk]]) 06:13, 13 November 2022 (UTC) Thank for your suggestion. I was adding history of the Chotanagpur region. But I will try to remove which are irrelevant and but I think some thing are important in history section. [[User:Dev0745|Dev0745]] ([[User talk:Dev0745#top|talk]]) 06:21, 13 November 2022 (UTC) :First of all, I don't think you are in a position to decide that since you are the one who added all of that irrelevant content to the article. You should restore my version and then carefully restore only the relevant parts. [[User:Dympies|Dympies]] ([[User talk:Dympies|talk]]) 06:26, 13 November 2022 (UTC) I also don't think you have right to remove all important materials which are added since 2018. There are many important materials related to Nagpuria people such as names, culture, communities etc. You are not admin.. If you want any changes, then talk with admin. [[User:Dev0745|Dev0745]] ([[User talk:Dev0745#top|talk]]) 06:31, 13 November 2022 (UTC) ::You don't need an admin to make a decision in content dispute. You are clearly showing [[WP:OWN]] behavior and evading concerning about your problematic editing (addition of irrelevant content and misrepresentation of sources). [[User:Dympies|Dympies]] ([[User talk:Dympies|talk]]) 15:07, 13 November 2022 (UTC) First read [[WP:OWN]] carefully. It clearly state ''be cautious when removing or rewriting large amounts of content, particularly if this content was written by one editor; it is more effective to try to work with the editor than against them''. So large amount of written material should not be removed. You are not the only person in Wikipedia who can decide. If you have any objection, you can edit any topic, but removing so much content is against Wikipedia policy. If you have confusion, you can talk with Admin. [[User:Dev0745|Dev0745]] ([[User talk:Dev0745#top|talk]]) 15:22, 13 November 2022 (UTC) ::You are showing page ownership by obstructing any attempt to improve the article. Do you understand that your own knowledge isn't enough and it needs to comply with [[WP:BLP]] and [[WP:VERIFY]] contrary to your [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nagpuria_people&diff=1121772917&oldid=1121772096 claim here]? Why would you even make this claim when I already cited BLP and lack of sources in my earlier edit[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nagpuria_people&diff=1121771882&oldid=1121657452]? Tell me you don't have a [[WP:CIR]] issue. [[User:Dympies|Dympies]] ([[User talk:Dympies|talk]]) 02:17, 14 November 2022 (UTC) You need to check the article of the people before removing them. The added person are either native speaker of Nagpuri language, or caste which speak only nagpuri language such as Chik Baraik, Nagvanshi and Routia, you can check it. Some are prominent writers, musician of Nagpuri language and they belong to the caste which speak Nagpuri language. So your claim about [[WP:BLP]] and [[WP:VERIFY]] not hold ground. [[User:Dev0745|Dev0745]] ([[User talk:Dev0745#top|talk]]) 02:24, 14 November 2022 (UTC) :I just checked names like [[Bulu Chik Baraik]], [[Lal Pingley Nath Shahdeo]], [[Nikki Pradhan]] and others and there is no source or information in this article that confirms them to be "Nagpuria" people. I only see that you are unnecessarily adding "Category:Nagpuria people"[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nikki_Pradhan&diff=1111977431&oldid=1104114497][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bulu_Chik_Baraik&diff=1111978052&oldid=1107063410][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lal_Pingley_Nath_Shahdeo&diff=1111977001&oldid=1111333590] in these articles. Are you unaware of [[WP:CATDEF]]? :Why you restored this completely irrelevant content again [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nagpuria_people&diff=1121773734&oldid=1121772917 here]? It is partially related to history of Eastern India but nothing much with "Nagpuria people". It is ironic that you were opposing the addition of "irrelevant" content just below this section at [[User_talk:Dev0745#Requesting_few_inputs]], while you are yourself promoting "irrelevant" content elsewhere. I sense this to be deceptive POV pushing on your part. :Apparently, you were topic banned by {{U|El C}} just 2 years ago and you were warned last time by {{U|Johnuniq}} for your disruptive editing just 1 month ago.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dev0745&oldid=1120010300#September_2022] You are not only exhibiting [[WP:CIR]] at this stage but also showing disruptive [[WP:OWN]] behavior by obstructing every single improvement that is being made to the article. Your uncollaborative approach including the false claim that only admins can make decisions within content dispute as justification for your obstruction should be also noted by these admins and they should sanction you accordingly. [[User:Dympies|Dympies]] ([[User talk:Dympies|talk]]) 14:47, 14 November 2022 (UTC) ::{{ping|Dympies}} I would need two or three clear examples of an ongoing problem that a discussion has failed to resolve. They would have to be explained in simple terms that an admin with no topic knowledge can follow. There would need to be a genuine engagement with the points raised and nothing else should be discussed at the same time. That is, there would need to be a tight focus on the problem and replies would have to clearly address points raised without distractions. I know it's hard to get opinions from others but there should be an attempt, say at a wikiproject. Ping me if you can identify a couple of discussions, preferably on an article talk page, where I might be able to see a reason for administrative action. [[User:Johnuniq|Johnuniq]] ([[User talk:Johnuniq|talk]]) 02:42, 15 November 2022 (UTC) {{od}} {{ping|Johnuniq}} The whole article [[Nagpuria people]] is created by Dev0745 and the problems are that he has: 1) used unreliable sources, 2) misrepresented sources, 3) added off-topic content, 4) added unsourced content, 5) he is showing [[WP:OWN]] behavior. Some crucial diffs:- 1) adding people's name without any sources[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nagpuria_people&diff=1121775566&oldid=1121774011] but he claimed above that he is doing it because the pages of these people say they are "nagpuria" but I have shown an example that they don't and its just Dev0745 who is adding category "Nagpuria people" in those pages without any heed to [[WP:CATDEF]]. 2) Adding information nothing to do with the subject.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nagpuria_people&type=revision&diff=1121607746&oldid=1121604483] I already asked him about it and he is trying to justify it by replying below that "{{tq|why would be this page be exception when other article of ethnic groups also talk about regional history}}". [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nagpuria_people&diff=1121022049&oldid=1121018153 This is another example] of completely off-topic addition with no relation to "Nagpuria people". [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nagpuria_people&diff=1121401133&oldid=1121400806 This is just same]. 3) Falsifying sources. I could find many but here I am providing you with the smallest and easiest examples to judge misrepresentation: *[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nagpuria_people&diff=1121117343&oldid=1121106386 Here]. ::Dev0745's text: :::"Brahmins were unwilling to recognise them as Hindus and branded them as untouchable and were not performing rituals in their wedding ceremony." ::Actual text: :::"The only objections to their being recognized as Hindus has been their unclean habits."[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301622899_The_Hinduization_of_Tribals_of_Jharkhand_An_Outline_since_Beginning] ::Its a clear-cut falsification because nowhere the source claim that "''Brahmins were unwilling to recognise them as Hindus." Not to mention that he is using a source from 1896 to talk about this subject, contrary to [[WP:RAJ]]. *[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nagpuria_people&diff=1121057466&oldid=1121054874 Here]. ::Dev0745's text: :::"Kashyap gotra found in very large numbers as many followers of non-vedic tradition were adopted it during 1st millennium CE due to spread of prosthelic activities of Brahmins." ::Actual [http://www.powerpolitics.in/Issues/July2019/page63.php text from unreliable source] he used: :::"‘Kashyap’ is the universal gotra, possibly because, as in Srimad Bhagwat Puran saga of creation – dated to the latter half of the Christian millennium - , Maharishi Kashyap and his myriad wives generated the most varied and largest number of beings." ::The source does not attribute "''prosthelic activities of Brahmins''" behind "Kashyap" gotra (lineage). 4) Using unreliable sources. Just [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nagpuria_people&diff=1121003920&oldid=1120887566 here] he used unreliable sources like "indpaedia.com", "Jharkhand General Knowledge 2022", "okworldguru.com", in a single edit. There should be no doubt that Dev0745 has [[WP:CIR]] issues together with the problems I mentioned. This is not even the only article he has disrupted. The damage he is causing can be reviewed only if he is under some restriction. [[User:Dympies|Dympies]] ([[User talk:Dympies|talk]]) 13:43, 19 November 2022 (UTC) ::{{ping|Dympies}}, following are my points: 1) Notable people are added as they are sourced. Some people's mother tongue is nagpuri. Some belongs to only nagpuri speaking caste such as Chik Baraik, Nagvanshi, Rautia. Some belongs to caste who speak Nagpuri as well as other language but they are prominent writers, musician of Nagpuri language. Is it necessary that sources will say that they are from Nagpuria community not their mother tounge is nagpuri, belongs A or B caste (nagpuri speaking caste) or prominent writers of Nagpuri language and belong to the A or B caste (which speak Nagpuri language as well as other language). 2) The proto-history is connected to Sadan or Nagpuria people as according to some histrorian Copper Hoard people were early Aryan speaker also according to Jharkhand Co-ordination committee, Sadan or Nagpuria people are early Aryan speaker. So there is a clear connection with proto-history with Nagpuria people. 3) *The article [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301622899_The_Hinduization_of_Tribals_of_Jharkhand_An_Outline_since_Beginning] is secondary scolarly article written in 2016 about situation of colonial period. Source is not direct colonial paper. I have corrected wording later. If the writing of situation during British rule citing secondary sources fall under [[User:Sitush/CasteSources#Writings of British Raj administrators|Raj Era writings]], then I think it should be removed. *Is [http://www.powerpolitics.in/Issues/May2020/about_us.php powerpolitics.in] unreliable? How can anyone decide? 4) I can agree about Indpaedia, okworldguru (doesn't warranties completeness and accuracy which I read later). But do you think Jharkhand General knowledge of [[Prabhat Prakashan]] is unreliable? I think Prabhat Prakashan is leading publication. Also I have citied Psychology Press publication. [[User:Dev0745|Dev0745]] ([[User talk:Dev0745#top|talk]]) 15:05, 19 November 2022 (UTC) I stated you earlier chik-Baraik, Bhogta and Nagvanshi are traditional speakers of Nagpuri language. You can check in communities section. Before accusing other about competent issue first look about your activity. You have removed huge content here[https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1121612691] without verifing it which is against Wikipedia policy. And why would be this page be exception when other article of ethnic groups also talk about regional history such as Neolithic, Indus valley civilization, copper age etc. [[Punjabis]], [[Bengali people]], [[Sindhi people]], [[Konkani people]] are few examples of this. Do you think this page is exception [[User:Dev0745|Dev0745]] ([[User talk:Dev0745#top|talk]]) 15:22, 14 November 2022 (UTC) == Requesting few inputs == @Dev0745 To help process of my self evaluation and improvement I seek following inputs from you. * a) You deleted {{dif|1099694557|mention of vegetarian food}} found in Indus valley civilization. Not giving that information creates impression that only [[Non-vegetarian]] food was found. :From your talk page replies about other articles it seems that you have tried to retain information saying ".. I think some thing are important in history section. .." but you do not seem to apply similar argument in this case. Just trying to understand how important this deletion was important to you and why you did not find balancing information is not relevant to the articles neutrality? * b) The earlier deletion is at least some what understandable {{dif|1099695753|in this deletion}} you seem to have deleted large chunk of well sourced information about "* Non-vegetarian cuisine from Indian Muslim communities " and you have not cited any information about your deletion in your edit summary either. Why did you delete it? I would like to understand your point of view, may be that shall help me improve myself. [[User:Bookku|&#32;Bookku ]] ([[User talk:Bookku|talk]]) 13:39, 13 November 2022 (UTC) :<s>@[[User:El C|El C]], Sorry before posting this message I did not see User @[[User:Dev0745|Dev0745]] is under some old sanction. IDK if he was allowed to edit the article I am discussing and at least is he allowed to explain the above requested questions to me?</s> [[User:Bookku|&#32;Bookku ]] ([[User talk:Bookku|talk]]) 13:46, 13 November 2022 (UTC) ::Sorry it did not strike me that the sanction is on very limited topic unrelated to the topic I am discussing here. [[User:Bookku|&#32;Bookku ]] ([[User talk:Bookku|talk]]) 15:10, 13 November 2022 (UTC) {{ping|Bookku}}, I deleted mention of vegitarian ladoo as in pre histroric times, they were just ladoo not vegitarian ladoo. Also article is about non-vegetarian food not vegitarian food. The non-vegetarian dishes of muslims discussion about halal and haram, party, dowry, other food stuff like Mithai i.e sweets are I think out of topic. Dishes should be added but extensive discussion about other things are irrelevant. You can add non-vegetarian dishes but don't add other irrelevant topics.. [[User:Dev0745|Dev0745]] ([[User talk:Dev0745#top|talk]]) 13:56, 13 November 2022 (UTC) Thanks for your inputs, I shall study it further and come back to you if needed for any further improvements. [[User:Bookku|&#32;Bookku ]] ([[User talk:Bookku|talk]]) 15:10, 13 November 2022 (UTC) Thanks..[[User:Dev0745|Dev0745]] ([[User talk:Dev0745#top|talk]]) 15:49, 13 November 2022 (UTC) :@[[User:Dev0745|Dev0745]] I had few more questions /options to seek community inputs, so I have made an [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard#Non-vegetarian, Requesting inputs|inputs request @ WP:RFN]] [[User:Bookku|&#32;Bookku ]] ([[User talk:Bookku|talk]]) 07:42, 14 November 2022 (UTC) == Nomination of [[:Varsha Rittu Lakra]] for deletion == <div class="afd-notice"> <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article '''[[:Varsha Rittu Lakra]]''' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]]. The article will be discussed at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Varsha Rittu Lakra]] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. <!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> [[User:Wareon|Wareon]] ([[User talk:Wareon|talk]]) 06:59, 23 November 2022 (UTC) == November 2022 == [[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px|alt=Warning icon]] Please stop your [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]]. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at [[:Dom (caste)]], you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]. ''In case of concerns, you may initiate a discussion on the article talk page. Such explained POV pushing and removal of sourced content may lead to blocks & topic ban!''<!-- Template:uw-delete3 --> [[User:Ekdalian|Ekdalian]] ([[User talk:Ekdalian|talk]]) 19:12, 25 November 2022 (UTC) :[[User:Ekdalian|Ekdalian]], can you why undid by edit? You had stated news articles are unreliable so I removed present Circumstances section which was added by me by citing news article. Then I added history of Dom dynasty by citing official government page of Jashpur district which you have removed.. Can you explain about it? If you can't explain I will undid your edit. [[User:Dev0745|Dev0745]] ([[User talk:Dev0745#top|talk]]) 19:20, 25 November 2022 (UTC) == Notice of discretionary sanctions on caste articles == <table class="gs-alert" style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: #E5F8FF; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%; margin-bottom: 1em"><tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Commons-emblem-notice.svg|50px]]</td><td>This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]]—such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]—on editors who do not strictly follow [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies]], expected [[Wikipedia:Etiquette|standards of behaviour]], or the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Discretionary_sanctions#Page_restrictions|page-specific restrictions]], when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the [[WP:GS/CASTE|guidance on these sanctions]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.</td></tr></table><!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --><!-- Template:Gs/alert --> -- [[User:Ekdalian|Ekdalian]] ([[User talk:Ekdalian|talk]]) 19:21, 25 November 2022 (UTC)'