User contributions for Dark Laughter
Appearance
A user with 57 edits. Account created on 17 February 2010.
23 March 2010
- 03:0603:06, 23 March 2010 diff hist −343 Wendy Doniger Who on earth cares what someone says in an EMAIL?? Worthwhile work is published properly, surely?
- 02:5302:53, 23 March 2010 diff hist +9 Manichaeism I improved the language
- 02:4802:48, 23 March 2010 diff hist −14 Manichaeism Other cosmologies have had good vs. evil struggles too, so I removed the implication that Manichaeism is the only religion that would teach anything like this
- 02:4002:40, 23 March 2010 diff hist −24 Manichaeism I improved the language
- 02:3202:32, 23 March 2010 diff hist −3 Michael Cremo I made another grammatical correction. One labels something pseudoscience. One does not label it "as" pseudoscience
- 02:3002:30, 23 March 2010 diff hist +4 Michael Cremo Added necessary word
- 02:2902:29, 23 March 2010 diff hist −7 Michael Cremo This is simply an edit to correct the grammar of this article. Hopefully that will be acceptable
- 00:1700:17, 23 March 2010 diff hist −1 Hindu views on evolution →ISKCON and evolution
- 00:1200:12, 23 March 2010 diff hist −1 Michael Cremo No edit summary
- 00:1100:11, 23 March 2010 diff hist 0 Michael Cremo No edit summary
- 00:1000:10, 23 March 2010 diff hist −44 Michael Cremo No edit summary
- 00:0600:06, 23 March 2010 diff hist −9 Michael Cremo No edit summary
- 00:0500:05, 23 March 2010 diff hist −5 International Society for Krishna Consciousness Made the article more accurate
- 00:0200:02, 23 March 2010 diff hist −9 Hindu views on evolution →ISKCON and evolution
- 00:0100:01, 23 March 2010 diff hist +4 Hindu views on evolution →ISKCON and evolution
- 00:0000:00, 23 March 2010 diff hist +3 Hindu views on evolution →ISKCON and evolution
22 March 2010
- 23:5923:59, 22 March 2010 diff hist −1 Hindu views on evolution →ISKCON and evolution
- 23:5723:57, 22 March 2010 diff hist −900 Islam and other religions Using the Koran as a source for claims about Islam or about what Muslims supposedly think is totally silly. They often interpret it differently, you know
21 February 2010
- 20:2620:26, 21 February 2010 diff hist −1,029 International Society for Krishna Consciousness Remove rubbish/trivia
- 20:2120:21, 21 February 2010 diff hist −25 International Society for Krishna Consciousness →2000 to the present
- 20:1520:15, 21 February 2010 diff hist −45 International Society for Krishna Consciousness corrected prose
- 19:5319:53, 21 February 2010 diff hist −18 International Society for Krishna Consciousness No edit summary
- 19:4819:48, 21 February 2010 diff hist −6 International Society for Krishna Consciousness tried to make lead clearer
- 19:4519:45, 21 February 2010 diff hist −14 Blade Runner Not an improvement - text added not well written
- 19:3519:35, 21 February 2010 diff hist −41 Hindu cosmology interesting but non-relevant fact
20 February 2010
- 21:3521:35, 20 February 2010 diff hist −9 Blade Runner No edit summary
- 21:1921:19, 20 February 2010 diff hist −48 International Society for Krishna Consciousness garbled prose corrected
- 07:2807:28, 20 February 2010 diff hist +114 Talk:Hindu views on evolution →Blavatsky's view
- 03:0303:03, 20 February 2010 diff hist +11 Life — How Did It Get Here? By Evolution or by Creation? No edit summary
- 03:0103:01, 20 February 2010 diff hist +5 Day-age creationism No edit summary
- 02:5202:52, 20 February 2010 diff hist −15 Young Earth creationism Undid revision 345109949 by 204.44.5.4 (talk) undid nasty edit
- 02:4902:49, 20 February 2010 diff hist −28 Old Earth creationism not relevant
19 February 2010
- 19:2019:20, 19 February 2010 diff hist 0 Young Earth creationism No edit summary
- 19:1519:15, 19 February 2010 diff hist +9 Deism No edit summary
- 19:1219:12, 19 February 2010 diff hist −22 Hindu views on evolution →Hindu opposition to Christian Creationism
- 19:0819:08, 19 February 2010 diff hist −68 Hindu views on evolution You consider it necessary to say that "views on evolution" includes "viewpoints in regards to evolution"?
- 19:0319:03, 19 February 2010 diff hist +550 Talk:Hindu views on evolution →Blavatsky's view
- 18:5518:55, 19 February 2010 diff hist −5 Hindu views on evolution No edit summary
- 18:5318:53, 19 February 2010 diff hist −63 Hindu views on evolution No edit summary
17 February 2010
- 06:5806:58, 17 February 2010 diff hist +621 Talk:Hindu views on evolution →Blavatsky's view: new section
- 06:5306:53, 17 February 2010 diff hist +252 Talk:Hindu views on evolution →Iskcon members ("Hare Krishnas") are NOT HINDUS
- 03:2803:28, 17 February 2010 diff hist −3 Talk:Hindu views on evolution →Iskcon members ("Hare Krishnas") are NOT HINDUS
- 03:2803:28, 17 February 2010 diff hist +441 Talk:Hindu views on evolution →Iskcon members ("Hare Krishnas") are NOT HINDUS
- 03:2003:20, 17 February 2010 diff hist +212 User talk:Abecedare No edit summary
- 03:1703:17, 17 February 2010 diff hist +87 User talk:Dark Laughter No edit summary
- 03:1503:15, 17 February 2010 diff hist +186 User talk:Abecedare No edit summary
- 03:1203:12, 17 February 2010 diff hist +163 Talk:Hindu views on evolution No edit summary
- 03:1003:10, 17 February 2010 diff hist +184 User talk:Dark Laughter →February 2010
- 02:5402:54, 17 February 2010 diff hist +316 Talk:Hindu views on evolution No edit summary
- 02:5102:51, 17 February 2010 diff hist −2,644 Hindu views on evolution ISKCON members are as noted not Hindus. Swami Prabhupada was very emphatic about this Tag: references removed