User contributions for Geoeg
Appearance
Results for Geoeg talk block log uploads logs global block log global account filter log
A user with 490 edits. Account created on 2 October 2007.
7 November 2007
- 18:4918:49, 7 November 2007 diff hist +3 User talk:Geoeg →To Mr.Mike Godwin: forgot to delete address to protect it against spam but here I edited it
- 18:4418:44, 7 November 2007 diff hist +1,540 User talk:Geoeg →To Mr.Mike Godwin
- 17:0617:06, 7 November 2007 diff hist +105 User talk:Geoeg →To Mr.Mike Godwin
- 17:0417:04, 7 November 2007 diff hist +770 User talk:Geoeg →To Mr.Mike Godwin
- 16:4816:48, 7 November 2007 diff hist −1 User talk:Geoeg →To Mr.Mike Godwin
- 16:4616:46, 7 November 2007 diff hist +1,329 User talk:Geoeg No edit summary
- 16:2916:29, 7 November 2007 diff hist +760 User talk:Geoeg →childish behavior
- 16:2216:22, 7 November 2007 diff hist +265 User talk:Geoeg →Blocked
- 16:1416:14, 7 November 2007 diff hist +1,621 User talk:Geoeg No edit summary
- 04:1004:10, 7 November 2007 diff hist +581 User talk:Geoeg →Blocked
6 November 2007
- 19:3119:31, 6 November 2007 diff hist +150 Photogrammetry No edit summary
- 19:2319:23, 6 November 2007 diff hist −23 Photogrammetry →See also: Del. link that seemed unrelated
- 19:1419:14, 6 November 2007 diff hist +536 User talk:Geoeg →childish behavior
- 19:0319:03, 6 November 2007 diff hist −1,968 Talk:Least-squares spectral analysis No edit summary
- 19:0119:01, 6 November 2007 diff hist −9,396 Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 18 Undid revision 169634042 by Isotope23 (talk) I said he authorized the removal. Ask Mikegodwin.
- 14:1214:12, 6 November 2007 diff hist −5,692 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests Removal of section as per approval by Mikegodwin, see Talk:Least-squares_spectral_analysis
- 14:0914:09, 6 November 2007 diff hist −9,396 Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 18 Removal of section as per approval by Mikegodwin, see Talk:Least-squares_spectral_analysis
- 14:0414:04, 6 November 2007 diff hist −1,411 Talk:Least-squares spectral analysis No edit summary
- 12:4012:40, 6 November 2007 diff hist −28 m Petr Vaníček No edit summary
- 12:4012:40, 6 November 2007 diff hist +300 Petr Vaníček Undid revision 169310827 by Dicklyon (talk) POV
- 12:3712:37, 6 November 2007 diff hist −1,135 Least-squares spectral analysis No edit summary
- 12:1912:19, 6 November 2007 diff hist −65 Least-squares spectral analysis Undid revision 169550866 by Dicklyon (talk) No need to distinguish them as Vanicek was not distinguished in same way too.
5 November 2007
- 03:5103:51, 5 November 2007 diff hist +4,726 Talk:Petr Vaníček No edit summary
- 03:4703:47, 5 November 2007 diff hist −1,163 Least-squares spectral analysis Undid revision 169185982 by Dicklyon (talk) Your reversal is based on POV pushing; See Talk page.
- 03:4703:47, 5 November 2007 diff hist +262 Talk:Least-squares spectral analysis →Put up or shut up
- 03:4503:45, 5 November 2007 diff hist +71 Talk:Least-squares spectral analysis →Dicklyon's behavior needs attention from Wikipedia admins
- 03:4403:44, 5 November 2007 diff hist 0 Talk:Least-squares spectral analysis →Put up or shut up
- 03:4303:43, 5 November 2007 diff hist −1 Talk:Least-squares spectral analysis →Dicklyon's behavior needs attention from Wikipedia admins
- 03:4303:43, 5 November 2007 diff hist −6 Talk:Least-squares spectral analysis →Dicklyon's behavior needs attention from Wikipedia admins
- 03:4103:41, 5 November 2007 diff hist +4,568 Talk:Least-squares spectral analysis No edit summary
- 03:3103:31, 5 November 2007 diff hist +247 Talk:Least-squares spectral analysis →Terminology section
- 03:2703:27, 5 November 2007 diff hist +276 Talk:Least-squares spectral analysis →Put up or shut up
- 03:2403:24, 5 November 2007 diff hist +177 Talk:Least-squares spectral analysis →Put up or shut up
- 03:2203:22, 5 November 2007 diff hist +300 Petr Vaníček Undid revision 169101359 by Dicklyon (talk) You should stop pushing POV on things you are not expert on.
- 03:1903:19, 5 November 2007 diff hist +283 Talk:Petr Vaníček →Why the Omerbashich reference is a bad idea
- 03:1303:13, 5 November 2007 diff hist −376 User talk:Geoeg No edit summary
4 November 2007
- 04:1904:19, 4 November 2007 diff hist −26 Gravitational field I just pointed out the resulting word repetition. Deleted first mention of "Newton's".
- 04:1404:14, 4 November 2007 diff hist −13 Geographic information system Undid revision 168869345 by 74.32.116.155 (talk) Seems commercial; Discuss it first.
- 04:1104:11, 4 November 2007 diff hist +29 Gravitational field Undid revision 169005737 by Mpatel (talk) seems incorrect linking
- 04:1004:10, 4 November 2007 diff hist +300 Petr Vaníček No edit summary
- 04:0604:06, 4 November 2007 diff hist −1,163 Least-squares spectral analysis Do not make edits you did not justify on Talk page. Moreover, do not mark such large edits as minor.
- 03:5803:58, 4 November 2007 diff hist +219 Talk:Least-squares spectral analysis →Terminology section
- 03:5503:55, 4 November 2007 diff hist +560 Talk:Least-squares spectral analysis →Terminology section
3 November 2007
- 04:4604:46, 3 November 2007 diff hist +240 Petr Vaníček Undid revision 168655787 by Dicklyon (talk) Changes implemented w/o explanation and based on allegations w/o proof.
- 04:4304:43, 3 November 2007 diff hist +139 Talk:Least-squares spectral analysis →Terminology section
- 04:4204:42, 3 November 2007 diff hist −1,424 Least-squares spectral analysis Undid revision 168655948 by Dicklyon (talk) Your rev. explanation is irrational; I did not get the joke on Talk page
2 November 2007
- 03:0603:06, 2 November 2007 diff hist −28 Petr Vaníček the fact that someone is in the same field as the subject of the article does not constitute COI. no other facts exists in the case.
- 03:0503:05, 2 November 2007 diff hist +268 Petr Vaníček Undid revision 168456167 by Dicklyon (talk) Reference actually supports statement.
- 03:0303:03, 2 November 2007 diff hist +132 Map →Scale and accuracy
- 02:5502:55, 2 November 2007 diff hist −1,424 Least-squares spectral analysis Undid revision 168451007 by Bfigura (talk) Read that paper's abstract; Read Google disclaimers; Read Talk page