User contributions for Kleopatra

8 February 2011

• 05:0905:09, 8 February 2011 diff hist +1,488 Template talk:Taxobox →Administrators: Please follow policy and have consensus for editing this template: I already gave up.

7 February 2011

• 03:2203:22, 7 February 2011 diff hist +346 Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/5 albert square →X!'s question: funny, but off topic, please take elsewhere
• 03:1703:17, 7 February 2011 diff hist +204 Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/5 albert square →X!'s question: pick one, HJ Mitchell: you can read my mind or not understand a word, but not both
• 01:0901:09, 7 February 2011 diff hist +697 User talk:X! →5 albert square RfA: new section
• 01:0601:06, 7 February 2011 diff hist +768 Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/5 albert square →X!'s question: new section
• 01:0401:04, 7 February 2011 diff hist +212 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/5 albert square →Oppose: response to non-question - move to talk page
• 00:1400:14, 7 February 2011 diff hist +578 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/5 albert square →Questions for the candidate: answer HJMitchell

6 February 2011

• 22:2222:22, 6 February 2011 diff hist +1,071 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/5 albert square →Questions for the candidate: you've copied the linked policies/guidelines; not necessarily shown understanding or ability to interpret according to community consensu
• 17:2917:29, 6 February 2011 diff hist +377 Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Plants →This and that; which is cismontane chaparral, and which is transmontane chapparal?: ec
• 17:0117:01, 6 February 2011 diff hist +106 User talk:Kleopatra No edit summary
• 16:5416:54, 6 February 2011 diff hist +1,090 Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Plants →This and that; which is cismontane chaparral, and which is transmontane chapparal?
• 16:3116:31, 6 February 2011 diff hist +1,779 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/5 albert square →Oppose: oppose per #7; specific non-admin closures are allowed; admins aren't better or more complex thinkers;
• 15:5815:58, 6 February 2011 diff hist +7 User talk:5 albert square →Follow up question at RfA: change
• 15:5715:57, 6 February 2011 diff hist +22 User:Kleopatra ←Redirected page to User talk:Kleopatra current
• 15:5615:56, 6 February 2011 diff hist −37 User talk:Kleopatra why bother

5 February 2011

• 23:3923:39, 5 February 2011 diff hist +642 User talk:Plastikspork →Bug in your browser and (semi-) automated edits: first edit was at bot discussion; alt account should have been watch listing that
• 23:2723:27, 5 February 2011 diff hist +613 Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard →AN/I discussion about 27,000 automated edits: post comment posted at AN/I and Plastikspork for bot owner input if necessary
• 23:2423:24, 5 February 2011 diff hist +236 User talk:Plastikspork →Bug in your browser and (semi-) automated edits: also, alert to other editors of bot/alt account bug would be appropriate
• 23:2223:22, 5 February 2011 diff hist +580 User talk:Plastikspork →Bug in your browser and (semi-) automated edits: new section
• 23:2123:21, 5 February 2011 diff hist +922 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Bob the Wikipedian: bug in browser: Plastikspork should not use alt account or bot until it's totally debugged
• 17:2417:24, 5 February 2011 diff hist +604 User talk:5 albert square →Follow up question at RfA: new section
• 17:2017:20, 5 February 2011 diff hist +648 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/5 albert square →Questions for the candidate: follow up question, please, where "more complex reasoning" is required of mop-wielders
• 05:2805:28, 5 February 2011 diff hist −930 User talk:Kleopatra ←Replaced content with 'Please don't post here. {{retired}}'
• 02:1202:12, 5 February 2011 diff hist +775 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Semi-automated controversial edits with alternate account: still, don't edit with two accounts simltaneously might also help
• 01:5601:56, 5 February 2011 diff hist +194 Wikipedia:Bot requests →Taxobox maintenance, one-time: oh, you might be right
• 01:5401:54, 5 February 2011 diff hist +252 User talk:DePiep →Thx: new section
• 01:3101:31, 5 February 2011 diff hist +787 Wikipedia:Bot requests →Taxobox maintenance, one-time: you're right it was only about 975 edits, not over 1000
• 01:1301:13, 5 February 2011 diff hist +553 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Bob the Wikipedian: maybe you should block yourself
• 01:0901:09, 5 February 2011 diff hist +275 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Is sock puppetry forbidden or not: also, if your alternate account is blocking you from getting messages on your main account watch list, maybe you should quit using it
• 01:0301:03, 5 February 2011 diff hist +2,406 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Is sock puppetry forbidden or not: c

4 February 2011

• 23:4323:43, 4 February 2011 diff hist +1,164 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Is sock puppetry forbidden or not: there's no rule that you can sock puppet maintenance tasks; and, controversial edits are not maintenance
• 22:0922:09, 4 February 2011 diff hist +670 User talk:Bob the Wikipedian →Your false accusations of a personal attack: I am Not! interested in you. Stop hounding me as if you matter to me. It's about the edits. It always has been about the encyclopedia. Not you! Stop it!
• 22:0422:04, 4 February 2011 diff hist +659 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Bob the Wikipedian: dang Bob get over me
• 15:4415:44, 4 February 2011 diff hist +791 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Bob the Wikipedian: well, it's an 87% chance they are
• 15:3715:37, 4 February 2011 diff hist +40 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Is sock puppetry forbidden or not: Economist article link
• 15:3615:36, 4 February 2011 diff hist +1,997 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Is sock puppetry forbidden or not: quotes for No Such User: what's being discussed in Economist/NYT
• 15:1815:18, 4 February 2011 diff hist +355 User talk:Kleopatra →Following policy: guilty
• 15:1715:17, 4 February 2011 diff hist +479 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/ErikHaugen →Support: s: strong sense of community
• 15:1315:13, 4 February 2011 diff hist +1 Template talk:Taxobox →Comments: Major point should not be collapsed: I can't edit the template; it's almost impossible to gain consensus because something's always broken lately
• 15:0615:06, 4 February 2011 diff hist +3,737 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Bob the Wikipedian: Plastikspork's Plasticspork is a sock puppet -that's what he did with it: avoided scrutiny, edited without consensus
• 07:0707:07, 4 February 2011 diff hist +831 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Semi-automated controversial edits with alternate account: sock puppetry forbidden or not? enforce the policy or change it;; but don't 2 tier it for administrator privileges
• 05:3405:34, 4 February 2011 diff hist −46 User talk:Kleopatra →Following policy: Stop it already!
• 05:1105:11, 4 February 2011 diff hist +250 Template talk:Taxobox →Comments: why not just collapse your admin access priviliges section, let others comment on the topic
• 05:0205:02, 4 February 2011 diff hist +867 User talk:Bob the Wikipedian →Your false accusations of a personal attack: r and unwatch to give you a break
• 04:2904:29, 4 February 2011 diff hist +526 Template talk:Taxobox →Comments: me jane
• 04:2304:23, 4 February 2011 diff hist +1,504 User talk:Bob the Wikipedian →Your false accusations of a personal attack: it's not about you
• 02:1702:17, 4 February 2011 diff hist +269 User talk:Kotra →You've been quoted: new section
• 02:1602:16, 4 February 2011 diff hist +1,672 Template talk:Taxobox →Comments: Kotra nailed it in your RfA; please pause; you might see it; let's move on
• 02:0102:01, 4 February 2011 diff hist +960 User talk:Bob the Wikipedian →Your false accusations of a personal attack: new section
• 01:1401:14, 4 February 2011 diff hist +366 Template talk:Taxobox →proposal: yes, like that