Jump to content

User talk:TheNuggeteer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ChristieBot (talk | contribs) at 04:03, 28 September 2024 (Your GA nomination of A Boy Is a Gun). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.




email me

User page

Userpage

    Talk

Talk

    Contributions

Articles

    Photo gallery

Logs

    Links

Directory

   


GA Review

Hello, you agreed to review the article Tropical Storm Harold for Good Article status but haven't begun since you opened the review 11 days ago. Are you still able to perform the review? JayTee⛈️ 15:36, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@JayTee32 Sorry, working on multiple reviews (probably a bad idea). 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 03:56, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Coming back to this, you've been very active the past few days and still have not gotten back to reviewing Harold even after I pinged you two days ago. Please do not commit to reviewing an article if you can't do so in a timely and concise manner. JayTee⛈️ 01:54, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive

New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive
  • On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edsel Galeos has been accepted

Edsel Galeos, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 01:32, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August blitz bling

The Minor Barnstar
This barnstar is awarded to TheNuggeteer for copy edits totaling between 1 and 1,999 words (including rollover words) during the GOCE August 2024 Copy Editing Blitz. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Miniapolis 13:26, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Afrique Victime

The article Afrique Victime you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Afrique Victime for comments about the article, and Talk:Afrique Victime/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vigilantcosmicpenguin -- Vigilantcosmicpenguin (talk) 01:22, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review limit

Hello, I've noticed that you've put up several articles for peer review. Per the first point of Wikipedia:Peer review/Guidelines, editors are limited to only one peer review request at a time. I suggest you choose which one you most urgently want feedback for and then take down the others. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 00:10, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Must've missed it, Tropical Storm Kai-tak already has a response, so can you archive it? Going to close Ilana (The Creator), leaving Afrique Victime. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 03:39, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Afrique Victime

Hello! Your submission of Afrique Victime at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:02, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New page reviewer granted

Hi TheNuggeteer, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! —Ganesha811 (talk) 23:04, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No Poop July moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to No Poop July. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Pbritti (talk) 02:52, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Severe Tropical Storm Lionrock (2010)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Severe Tropical Storm Lionrock (2010) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TyphoonAmpil -- TyphoonAmpil (talk) 03:43, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved content from 2010 Pacific typhoon season into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content (here or elsewhere), Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. C F A 💬 13:28, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Panda town

Why did you tag this new article for notability concerns, and then mark the page as patrolled? If an article is not notable, it should be draftified and/or deleted, but certainly not patrolled immediately after tagging until multiple people have seen it.

I see you've recently received the NPP bit. Generally speaking, "checking for notability" is a hot topic for NPPers (at least, according to WP:NPP#Notability). If you go into the New Page queue and take a look at all the oldest articles, you'll see them all marked for notability, and/or several other tags, because nobody particularly wants to sign and vet them out so they're always chilling at the back-end. (This also includes redirects that are recently converted into articles). If a page is tagged with "passable" tags that are not AfDable, such as a "too long lead" tag, those are safer to patrol as an article shouldn't be deleted for having "too few sections" or etc. But because notability is policy, if something isn't notable, it shouldn't be on Wikipedia, and shouldn't be patrolled immediately if there are notability concerns. Just something to consider moving forward.

I do believe the topic in question is notable, because clicking on the coordinates takes me to a populated, legally recognized place named "Panda", and populated places have presumed notability per the info contained in WP:GEOLAND, so I've removed the tag. Utopes (talk / cont) 13:42, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: 2025 in hip hop music

Hello TheNuggeteer. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of 2025 in hip hop music, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2025 in hip hop music. Any fault here, either as Admin or just as a regular editor, is entirely my own. . Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 09:58, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/No Poop July at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step III of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 13:09, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chanthu

The reason i reverted Chanthu's GA nomination is because it is nowhere near ready for a GA Nomination and needs a very thorough expansion to tell the story of what Chanthu did, how it evolved and what impacts it caused etc. As for you not being a significant contributor, when you nominated the article you barely had 3 edits to the article, which barely added anything to the article. Compare Chanthu, to one of my GA's Cyclone Anne of 1988. Sure its not perfect but it tells the story and is probably the best summary of Anne out there, which is the standard required for a GA nomination.Jason Rees (talk) 12:37, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think I barely added anything to the article, currently, XTools says I contributed 5,214 bytes or 48.4 percent of the article, making myself the top contributor (for authorship). For text added, the original creator, HyperSonicX, has 43.6 percent, while I have 37.7 percent of texxt added. Is this significant enough to nom? 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 12:48, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
When i look at the three edits that you had perfomed before nominating it for GAN they didnt add anything major in. That is just my opinion though, however, your focusing on the wrong thing. Your priority should be to expand the article significantly to ensure it covers all available sources and not to come along do a couple of minor edits and nominate it for GA. Jason Rees (talk) 13:37, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DCWC September update

The Developing Countries WikiContest has now been running for two months, and we've seen tremendous improvement in the encyclopedic coverage of several underrepresented areas from a wide range of editors! The coordinators would like to highlght some of the newer faces who have been making notable contributions in the contest, including but by no means limited to:

Only one month remains until the end of the contest, so it's time to make your remaining nominations! Please consider answering some review requests, particularly the older entries, as a way of helping out your fellow participants and moving up the leaderboard. Good luck!

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 22:00, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Iloilo Central Market

On 5 September 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Iloilo Central Market, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the demolition of the Iloilo Central Market was criticized as being unlawful? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Iloilo Central Market. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Iloilo Central Market), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
92 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B 2017 Pacific typhoon season (talk) Add sources
170 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B 2019 Pacific typhoon season (talk) Add sources
680 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Ethnic groups in the Philippines (talk) Add sources
8 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Typhoon Nuri (2008) (talk) Add sources
1,444 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Tuareg people (talk) Add sources
6 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Adebayo Alonge (talk) Add sources
1,092 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company (talk) Cleanup
1,783 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Lolita (1962 film) (talk) Cleanup
696 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Bridgestone (talk) Cleanup
172 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B 2018 Pacific typhoon season (talk) Expand
176 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B 2021 Pacific typhoon season (talk) Expand
44 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C Cheese (recreational drug) (talk) Expand
105 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Girl math (talk) Unencyclopaedic
1,128 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: GA Censorship of TikTok (talk) Unencyclopaedic
194 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (talk) Unencyclopaedic
365 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Sinopec (talk) Merge
35 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Transnational Corporation of Nigeria (talk) Merge
1,438 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: GA Bariatric surgery (talk) Merge
59 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Tropical cyclones in 2022 (talk) Wikify
29 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Scout24 (talk) Wikify
17 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Qatar–United Kingdom relations (talk) Wikify
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Michael P. Link (talk) Orphan
22 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Edsel Galeos (talk) Orphan
18 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start DrSmile (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub Rebecca Trussell (talk) Stub
11 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Jean-Paul Proust (talk) Stub
14 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Dumarao (talk) Stub
25 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: B Serge Telle (talk) Stub
41 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Ronda, Cebu (talk) Stub
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Jean Herly (talk) Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:59, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mayor of Pasay moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Mayor of Pasay. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:41, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tropical Storm Talas (2017)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tropical Storm Talas (2017) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 17:43, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tropical Storm Talas (2017)

The article Tropical Storm Talas (2017) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Tropical Storm Talas (2017) and Talk:Tropical Storm Talas (2017)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 20:42, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of .tv

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article .tv you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sohom Datta -- Sohom Datta (talk) 01:26, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of .tv

The article .tv you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:.tv for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sohom Datta -- Sohom Datta (talk) 03:24, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Old Pacific typhoons, List of typhoons in the Philippines (1900-1929), and a check-in

Hey there TheNuggeteer. I saw you published List of typhoons in the Philippines (1900-1929). I see you have 1900-1902 done, but that's it. I wondered if you needed help finding the sources for the rest of the early 1900s. I know you've been using the Selga chronology, but there are plenty of other sources for that time period, especially pertaining to the Philippines. It also seems like you're trying to tackle a lot of different articles. I just wanted to check in how you're doing with your editing. It seems like you're really ambitious to getting stuff done, which I think is great and really admirable! However, it might lead to stuff getting rushed, or not properly researched, and maybe a rush to publish incomplete works. I've been editing for a while, and I know that some projects take some time to really get right. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 03:37, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When I found the Selga chronology, I thought the chronology would boost the creation but instead made it slower, should I only include the typhoons or all systems? 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 07:29, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Severe Tropical Storm Lionrock (2010)

The article Severe Tropical Storm Lionrock (2010) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Severe Tropical Storm Lionrock (2010) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TyphoonAmpil -- TyphoonAmpil (talk) 03:43, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have been busy all week, after offering to co-review this article last Saturday, and so hadn't had time to properly inspect the article. I was about to go through it this morning, but found that the article had failed the process as of a few hours ago. I re-read the article, and whilst I still think the prose problems can be resolved in a timely manner, I would recommend that a WP:GOCE volunteer review the article prose before it is renominated. This is assuming that the article isn't merged into the season article as Hurricanehink has proposed. Mr rnddude (talk) 04:11, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Mr rnddude I don't think I should request a CE, since one of my requests from July were still unanswered. You can review if you want :) 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 04:44, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Severe Tropical Storm Lionrock (2010)

Hello! Your submission of Severe Tropical Storm Lionrock (2010) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 16:13, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Typhoon Nat (1991)

Hello! Your submission of Typhoon Nat (1991) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Z1720 (talk) 23:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to your user page

Hey there, I saw you recently added your birthday and location to your user page. It's not a good idea for young users to add their age and location, on such a public website. Check out the page Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors. If you want, I can delete the edit where you added that. I suggest removing your birthday and exact location for privacy reasons. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hurricanehink You can revert that. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 22:20, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done, just be careful in the future. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 07:00, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kitab-ı Bahriye

I noticed your username when you promoted this DYK to a prep set because I hadn't seen you around DYK backrooms much. Just wanted to say thanks for working on the prep sets. They are kind of a hassle to do, and only a handful of editors build. Thanks and take care, Rjjiii (talk) 04:03, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I regularly nominate and review DYKs, and wanted to work in the backrooms for once. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 04:22, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors September Newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors September Newsletter

Hello and welcome to the September newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since June. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below.

Election news: Project coordinators play an important role in our WikiProject. Following the mid-year Election of Coordinators, we welcomed Mox Eden to the coordinator team. Dhtwiki remains as Lead Coordinator, and Miniapolis and Wracking returned as assistant coordinators. If you'd like to help out behind the scenes, please consider taking part in our December election – watchlist our ombox for updates. Information about the role of coordinators can be found here.

Blitz: 13 of the 24 editors who signed up for the June 2024 Copy Editing Blitz copy edited at least one article. Between them, they copy edited 169,404 words comprising 41 articles. Barnstars awarded are here.

Drive: 38 of the 59 editors who signed up for the July 2024 Backlog Elimination Drive copy edited at least one article. Between them, they copy edited 482,133 words comprising 293 articles. Barnstars awarded are here.

Blitz: 10 of the 15 editors who signed up for the August 2024 Copy Editing Blitz copy edited at least one article. Between them, they copy edited 71,294 words comprising 31 articles. Barnstars awarded are here.

Drive: Sign up here to earn barnstars in our month-long, in-progress September Backlog Elimination Drive.

Progress report: As of 05:14, 11 September 2024 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 233 requests since 1 January, and the backlog of tagged articles stands at 2,824 articles.

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we do without you! Cheers from Baffle gab1978 and your GOCE coordinators Dhtwiki, Miniapolis, Mox Eden and Wracking.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Message sent by Baffle gab1978 (talk) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:54, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
2,325 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Brazilian jiu-jitsu (talk) Add sources
17 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Slaughter alley (talk) Add sources
135 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Arcade cabinet (talk) Add sources
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Jacques Dupont (politician) (talk) Add sources
4 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C 2022 Basilan local elections (talk) Add sources
644 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Non-player character (talk) Add sources
5 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Typhoon Koppu (2009) (talk) Cleanup
351 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Communist Party of the Philippines (talk) Cleanup
674 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: GA Japanese Brazilians (talk) Cleanup
4 Quality: High, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: GA Timeline of the 2010 Pacific typhoon season (talk) Expand
42 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C 1970 Pacific typhoon season (talk) Expand
789 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: GA 2023 Pacific typhoon season (talk) Expand
801 Quality: High, Assessed class: GA, Predicted class: GA Steak (talk) Unencyclopaedic
2,567 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Hamburger (talk) Unencyclopaedic
6,619 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Al-Qaeda (talk) Unencyclopaedic
95 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B 2010 Pacific typhoon season (talk) Merge
12 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Controversies surrounding the eurozone crisis (talk) Merge
14 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start November 2023 Brazil heat wave (talk) Merge
268 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B 2020s in music (talk) Wikify
1,455 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Remy Ma (talk) Wikify
506 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B 2020s in fashion (talk) Wikify
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Antonio Menchaca Careaga (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Baylor Teen Health Clinic (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Böðvar Guðjónsson (talk) Orphan
64 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub André Saint-Mleux (talk) Stub
15 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Libertad, Antique (talk) Stub
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub François-Didier Gregh (talk) Stub
16 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Maria, Siquijor (talk) Stub
10 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Hinabangan (talk) Stub
13 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Tayasan (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:25, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Abduction of Jonila Castro and Jhed Tamano

On 13 September 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Abduction of Jonila Castro and Jhed Tamano, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that two kidnapped activists were released after claiming at a press conference that they were abducted by government forces? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Abduction of Jonila Castro and Jhed Tamano. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Abduction of Jonila Castro and Jhed Tamano), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Kusma (talk) 00:03, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ernie Pike

Hey :) I've left some comments on the GAN for Ernie Pike recommending you close the review as a fail. If you disagree then let me know, else you should probably close the review. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 03:12, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tropical Storm Talas (2017)

The article Tropical Storm Talas (2017) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tropical Storm Talas (2017) for comments about the article, and Talk:Tropical Storm Talas (2017)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 05:41, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Severe Tropical Storm Lionrock (2010)

The article Severe Tropical Storm Lionrock (2010) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Severe Tropical Storm Lionrock (2010) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IntentionallyDense -- IntentionallyDense (talk) 00:43, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Slow down

Hello. Over the past couple weeks I've seen your edits and the issues over at GAN, and while I can appreciate wanting to be bold and work on what you can, you do need to slow down some, as you seem to be taking on more than you can chew. There were concerns raised on the GAN talk page about taking on things without finishing them, and the response to that now appears to be nominating something at FLC, which has surface issues that have already been commented on. To be honest, it's starting to cross the line from "I want to help out where I can" to not wanting to listen to the constructive criticism you are getting. The line between being productive and disruptive is unfortunately not as clear-cut as it probably should be here, and you need to take care to not ride that line too much. To start, I'd suggest just focusing on one process you want to work on and get good at that before branching out, rather than trying to tackle everything at once, as that's just going to be a recipe for disaster on both sides. Wizardman 16:11, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TheNuggeteer, I'll go a step further than Wizardman and explicitly say that I think you should step away from Good Articles entirely for now, both as a submitter and as a reviewer. I know this can be hard to hear, but your actions have been leaving other editors feeling really frustrated, and the encyclopedia works a lot better when we're all having fun writing it. No one's going to hold a grudge against you for very long if you take a step back, but if you keep doing the same kind of thing people are just going to get more and more annoyed. I don't want you to feel guilty or ashamed about leaving these reviews unfinished and needing to complete them: you can simply close them and move on, and for any that you haven't even really started, we can simply delete those and return them to the queue. It really will all be fine in the end.
Actually, if I can make a suggestion, I think it would be a really good idea for you to avoid all content review, contests, and editathons for a while. We run these for a variety of reasons; a major one is that it motivates editors to create good content and collaborate with others. But it really doesn't look to me like you need that motivation! I look at your contribution history and I see a new editor who is already highly motivated to help out and really excited to build the encyclopedia. You've created a lot of new articles, you've made thousands of edits, and you've joined all kinds of different projects. What it also looks like, though, is a new editor who is thinking more about the recognition they can get than the things they can do to make the encyclopedia better. Maybe that's true, in which case you really need to rethink your approach. Maybe it's not true -- in which case, I invite you to prove it, to us and to yourself. -- asilvering (talk) 19:56, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I would like to corroborate this. You really need to finish your GAN reviews before starting new ones, and often leaving them dormant for unnecessary periods of time. I had to directly tell you to finish a review you started but left dormant for nearly 3 weeks and seemingly ignored requests by the nominator to follow up, despite you being extremely active at the time and taking on more reviews. I'm glad to see you have now done it, but I don't feel like I should have needed to intervene like that. Thanks for bringing it up Wizardman. TheBritinator (talk) 23:35, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tumor necrosis factor

I’ve been seeing a lot of you over at GA and I was wondering if you would like to collaborate on your review for the page Tumor necrosis factor. It’s a pretty big page and I’m interested in reviewing it but would also appreciate some help. I think we could both learn a lot this way. Usually with co-reviewing one person picks something to tackle but we could also just both work on the review together and share our process. If you’d prefer to collaborate via email as well I’m open to that as well. IntentionallyDense (talk) 17:15, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK Update?

Hi @TheNuggeteer: I assume you'll be reviewing my DYK DYK:Dilaw (song) nomination. I just want to check if it's been approved or not. Thanks! Royiswariii (talk) 11:52, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, why not? I plan on nominating AmBisyon Natin 2040 for DYK and this can probably be my QPQ. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 12:07, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
sure, i can do that. Royiswariii (talk) 12:58, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Typhoons in Taiwan

Hello! Your submission of Typhoons in Taiwan at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and your nomination has been rejected. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry before nominating further. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Leafy46 (talk) 15:23, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Teodoro Asedillo

On 17 September 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Teodoro Asedillo, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that a former teacher in the Philippines became a Robin Hood–like outlaw? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Teodoro Asedillo. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Teodoro Asedillo), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Kusma (talk) 00:26, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Philippines at the 1928 Summer Olympics

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Philippines at the 1928 Summer Olympics you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Arconning -- Arconning (talk) 13:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re: 1953 Pacific typhoon season

Hey there TheNuggeteer. I got your email about the 1953 Pacific typhoon season. I wondered what you meant by reformatting. Do you mean expanding? If so, that would be really beneficial. Almost all of the sections are empty.

A few easy sources you could use:

Hopefully this is a good start! Good luck fellow Wikipedian. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:40, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to reformat the page to have monthly sections, like the 1937 season, because most of the sections are empty. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 04:00, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kevin Sagra for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kevin Sagra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Sagra (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

C F A 💬 12:59, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited A Boy Is a Gun, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Igor.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Philippines at the 1928 Summer Olympics

The article Philippines at the 1928 Summer Olympics you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Philippines at the 1928 Summer Olympics for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Arconning -- Arconning (talk) 14:43, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA reviewing

Hi -- I noticed you've started another GA review, and I see from above that there's a thread that you haven't responded to in which some have suggested you should not be reviewing articles at GAN until you have a bit more experience. There was also a conversation at WT:GAN to the same effect; you responded there but didn't comment on the request for you not to review for a while.

Since you've now picked up another review, can I ask you to address those concerns? You've had some experienced editors telling you you need to slow down, but you seem to be ignoring them. Can you tell me why? Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 14:26, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I honestly don't know how long to take a break for, I took a break for five days, and I don't know how much longer. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 23:12, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
By the way-I already completed the review, which is leaning towards a fail. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 23:15, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@TheNuggeteer I hate to insert myself here and I can't speak on behalf of anyome else but I have reached out offering to help you out with your review of Tumor necrosis factor. It's a pretty tricky article for anyone to review let alone someone who isn't experienced with medical topics. I know others have suggested you take a break but I'm thinking maybe collaborating on a GA review might be a good way to ease back into things. IntentionallyDense (talk) 03:34, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@IntentionallyDense What about you review the medical parts and I review the rest? 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 03:38, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@TheNuggeteer It's a little hard to just review the medical parts since every part of the page from prose, format, and sources are all dependant on the medical manual of style. I was thinking maybe we could kinda just work alongside each other and share our proccess. It might be easiest for you to start with the prose review and for me to start tackling the sources as sources tend to be the hardest part with medical pages (see WP:MEDRS). With reviweing prose for medical articles it might be helpful for you to look over WP:MEDLANG, Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Medicine-related articles#Writing for the wrong audience, and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Medicine-related articles#Writing style. One of the biggest things is making sure that these articles are understandable to a broad audience. Meaning that if you find yourself confused while reading something then that probably needs to be changed to be more understandable. If in doubt I would lean on the side of caution and bring up anything you find overly technical and I can help you figure out if the wording used is appropriate. IntentionallyDense (talk) 03:48, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
TheNuggeteer, I was going to suggest that you find another editor who is willing to help you; a mentor, in other words. It looks like IntentionallyDense is offering to take that role on for at least one review. Can I suggest that you stop picking up new GA reviews until you've completed the review with IntentionallyDense? And if IntentionallyDense is willing to take on the extra responsibility, perhaps you could follow their advice on when you are ready to start doing new reviews again? Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 12:58, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Mike Christie Okay. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 13:11, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Mike Christie Side note I am happy to take on the extra responsibility. Because the page is so complex I am probably going to ask for a third set of eyes at the GA talkpage, more so for peace of mind. I have started doing the review however @TheNuggeteer hasn't started reviewing yet (which is fine as prose reviews can take awhile). I'm hoping that they will chime in with some prose review soon and then we can take it from there! I am trying to lay out each step of my review so this can be a learning experience for everyone and hopefully that will help a bit. IntentionallyDense (talk) 18:32, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Al Gelato for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Al Gelato is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al Gelato until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Netherzone (talk) 23:36, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail

Hello, TheNuggeteer. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

IntentionallyDense (talk) 03:38, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Tyler, The Creator

Hello. Please note that according to the proposals page of the WikiProject Council, which determines if a proposed WikiProject can be created, no WikiProjects should be started unless their proposal process is overhauled. Once you see this message, you might want to WP:G7 that page and all relevant pages thereof. Elias / PSA 🏕️🪐 [please make some noise] 05:00, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can also consider If your group can't wait for the new process, please only create group pages in the userspace of one of your members. So I can probably move it into my userspace. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 07:41, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
seconding this. given that this wikiproject only has one other participant and such a niche scope, i don't think it will be very useful in the grand scheme of things, and even less so in userspace where it will be sequestered away. i suggest you have a look through Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject SZA (2nd nomination). ... sawyer * he/they * talk 13:18, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DCWC submission declined

Hey TheNuggeteer, and thanks for your participation in the Developing Countries WikiContest. I've declined your submission of this GAN review for points as it does not meet the standards expected for a review of this kind. Your review is quite short and none of your comments make reference to the good article criteria to explain why you failed the nomination, and some of the suggestions you made — such as lengthening the lead or rearranging sections — are neither within the scope of a GAN review nor explicitly required by any policy or guideline. Please see the relevant section of the scoring rules for more information, and let me or another coordinator know if you have any questions.

Speaking only as an editor and not an event coordinator, I would highly recommend that you immediately disengage from content quality–related processes on Wikipedia and focus your efforts elsewhere for some time. Many editors over the last few months have warned you about the improvements needed in the way you approach these processes. So far, those improvements have not been forthcoming, and continuing on that path will likely lead to the community placing sanctions on you based on the "competence is required" rule. These kinds of decisions are unnecessarily stressful for everyone involved, and will make it much harder for you to return to contributing to those areas in the future. I think everyone would prefer if that mess could be avoided, so the best option that I think you have is to voluntarily step away from article creation, GAN, FLC, NPP, and possibly others. Use your time away to take it slow, build your editorial experience in other areas, and familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines so you can come back in the future (at least a few months later) a much more constructive contributor. And you don't need to dive back into things headfirst, there are resources in place for you to seek help if you need it. For example, you could make use of the GA mentorship, articles for creation, or NPP school processes to ease your transition back into those roles with lower stakes and guidance from experienced editors. I hope you will consider my suggestions, and I wish you the best wherever your editing career takes you next. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 22:34, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bilorv's minimalist challenge

Hey, I don't want to be the fun police, but that challenge is for getting an article to GA before there are 50 revisions in the page history total. Both of the articles you're citing have well over 100 edits, so they don't qualify. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:19, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I thought you meant the how many edits the user created to the page. Did you revert it? 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 04:22, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, a few people have made that mistake, I think I'm going to clarify the wording of the challenge. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:36, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Bigkis Pinoy Movement

Hey, quick question: you have been around for a while and could create an article directly into mainspace yet decided to submit Draft:Bigkis Pinoy Movement for review (I'm currently going through the AfC backlog). Is there any specific reason for doing so? Superboilles (talk) 21:14, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bigkis Pinoy Movement (September 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 03:20, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library

Hey there, I'm reviewing Philippines at the 1928 Summer Olympics which I saw you nominated for GA. I think looking at the improvements made by another editor before they renominated it, and their use of WP:The Wikipedia Library would really help you with writing better Wikipedia articles. Tell me if you have any questions. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 08:04, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nice! The only library I know was JSTOR. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 08:17, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK Nomination

Hi TheNuggeteer! I'm asking if you can review my DYK nomination here: DYK/Bini (group). Thanks! Royiswariii (talk) 16:56, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Royiswariii I have no QPQs lined up yet. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 22:50, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 26 September 2024

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:12, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

Hey TheNuggeteer! I responded to your comments on the GA nomination for Swawilla Fire a few days ago, which you may not have seen. Just a reminder, no need to rush anything. :) SirMemeGod  13:03, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, just a bit shaken by a discussion made to me and a recent talk page message above. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 13:08, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You're fine, I completely understand. I'm not one to rush people about things, if it takes a month, I'm fine with that. (striking out my comment as things should be done in a timely manner, but you get my point). :) SirMemeGod  13:25, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Last prep at DYK

Hi there. If you're promoting hooks to the final set, keep in mind that we like to have at least half the set empty, so that problematic hooks from earlier preps can be swapped in if necessary. Thanks! ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:06, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for the notice! 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 23:05, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of A Boy Is a Gun

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article A Boy Is a Gun you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PSA -- PSA (talk) 01:43, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you are willing to further discuss this nomination, as well as nominating more articles for GAN going forward, please do not hesitate to ping me here. I also invite people who have previously said something about it here to participate. Elias / PSA 🏕️🪐 [please make some noise] 03:56, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of A Boy Is a Gun

The article A Boy Is a Gun you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:A Boy Is a Gun for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PSA -- PSA (talk) 04:03, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TheNuggeteer&oldid=1248184899"