Talk:.480 Ruger
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
January 2010
[edit]Wrote to Midway asking for permission to use one of their images. Kartano (talk) 23:42, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- Permission was denied to use this image. Kartano (talk) 00:42, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
March 2010
[edit]Wrote to the GunBlast website asking for permission to use their image of the .480 Ruger. Kartano (talk) 00:42, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
- Done - image added, permissions forwarded on to OTRS. Kartano (talk) 01:54, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Citation Needed Correction
[edit]The request for citation at the end of the following sentence should not be necessary, as the comment is not claiming a specific fact and provides popular culture reference which is reasonable to believe (it's not hard to imagine internet forums buzzing about a new product within an industry).
"Magazine articles and online forums were, for a brief while, replete with discussion about the potential of the cartridge." - Under USAGE Gregrium (talk) 21:40, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
Outdated Information
[edit]This section is outdated and needs to be rewritten:
There were many handgunners that disliked the heavy Super Redhawk, and waited for Ruger to release the cartridge in their Super Blackhawk single-action. This never came to pass, so many potential buyers chose to just pass on the cartridge.
Ruger now has a Super Blackhawk in 480 Ruger.[1] DrHenley (talk) 02:04, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Update (Dec. 2015)
[edit]A picture of the 480 Ruger needs to be added to the page, possible a comparison to other magnum class calibers picture should be added as well.
There is a Lot of POV in this Article
[edit]This seems to be a particularly pervasive problem in the handgun section, but there is a lot of POV writing in this article. Syr74 (talk) 01:39, 17 March 2018 (UTC)