Talk:2010 Conger–Albert Lea tornado

Weather: Thunderstorms / Tornadoes Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tornadoes portal This article is supported by WikiProject Severe weather (assessed as Low-importance).

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Minnesota Low‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability table

Running my AfC table.

EF5's Tornado AfD Table
Criteria no.	Sub-criteria	Description	Pass?	Fail?	Comments
1 (Coverage)	1a	Any coverage?	Y		CBS News, 10 years after the tornado
	1b	Any significant coverge? (e.g. CNN or the NYT)	Y		CBS News, 10 years after the tornado
	1c	Any lasting coverage past 6 months after the tornado?	Y		CBS News, 10 years after the tornado
2 (Strength)	2a	Was the tornado EF0-EF2?			Usually a sign of non-notability, there are exceptions to this though
	2b	Was the tornado EF3?			May be a sign of notability
	2c	Was the tornado EF4?	Y		Usually a sign of notability
	2d	Was the tornado EF5?			If a post-2013 EF5, then an instant pass. Usually a quick-pass
3 (Damage)	3a	Did the tornado kill at least one person?	Y		One person.
	3b	Did the tornado injure at least one person?	Y		14 people.
	3c	Did the tornado cause monetary damage totaling over $200,000 USD?	?		Damage estimates unknown.
4 (Aftermath)	4a	Did the tornado significantly damage a town?		Y	Did damage towns, none significantly.
4 (Aftermath)	4b	Any notable deaths?		Y	None that I'm aware of.
5 (Content)	5a	Is the article not a CFORK of an existing section?	Y		No section on tornado.
	5b	Can the content not be easily merged into a section?	Y		No section on tornado.
	5c	Is the article longer than the page on its respective outbreak?		Y
	5d	Is the article a GA, FA or has recently been featured on DYK?		Y	Not published yet.
6 (Overall)	6a	Are at least five of these criterion met, with exceptions made if needed?	Y		If at least 1b, 3b, 3c, 5c and 1c are met, then a pass is warranted. If not, then a fail is warranted. Exceptions can be made at my discretion.
Final verdict:		Pass: Will publish.