Talk:ASPM (gene)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the ASPM (gene) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Molecular Biology: Genetics / MCB

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 15 January 2019 and 25 April 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kileytimmons, KZarabian. Peer reviewers: Aripastore, Jrmalleck.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 13:12, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

large uncertainty

the statement, "The mean estimated age of the ASPM allele of 5,800 years ago, roughly correlates with the development of written language, spread of agriculture and development of cities" seems highly speculative given the large uncertainty of the dates in question. Is there any evidence that will pin this down to something reasonable like ±600 years, instead of the present ±6000 or so? if not, then then we should look for some criticisms to include to balance this claim. -- 99.233.186.4 (talk) 20:10, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, especially since the Wik article on the history of agriculture says, "Agriculture involving domestication of plants and animals was developed [true, this is development and not spread, but still] at least 10,000 years ago, " and the Wik article on the history of writing gives a date of 3,000 B.C. 211.225.33.104 (talk) 05:47, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the lower bound of "500 years ago" because it is obviously far too generous. What we know is probably better stated as "less than 14100 years ago". —Soap— 21:25, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]