Talk:Athiyur

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Athiyur article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

India: Tamil Nadu / Geography Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tamil Nadu (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Protection

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Not done: requests for changes to the page protection level should be made at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 03:16, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is no need for this article to be edit protected to begin with. What we have here is an editor who thinks they can add whatever they want to the article, and when the content that doesn't follow manual of style gets removed, gets upset and asks for protection. The same editor previously tried to get the article protected because I fixed text that had all words begin with capital letters. We have used the edit summary and editors talk page to try to explain why content is removed or edited, so I don't know what more we can do, but asking for protection so that content not allowed or not following manual of style can remain in the article is not the answer. Cmr08 (talk) 21:33, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I concur with your opinion Cmr08. I am currently copy-editing the article to include adding references. I currently have the GOCE inuse tag in place to prevent edit conflicts. I hope we can all work together and keep the article in the best condition possible. I have left a note on the talk page of one user who has continuously been adding copyrighted and watermarked inappropriate images to the article to please stop that. I have not seen any communication from that user. Hopefully that user as well as other editors will continue to try to improve or expand the article rather than disrupt other editing of the article, and or vandalize the article. What are your thoughts on this Cmr08? Carriearchdale (talk) 22:15, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Now that you mention it, all the times I left him a message or an edit summary, he has not once made an attempt to discuss. By the way, the message I left on you talk page was written before I noticed the reply here. Cmr08 (talk) 22:21, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Athiyur. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:06, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Athiyur. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120423111018/http://census2001.tn.nic.in/ to http://census2001.tn.nic.in/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:53, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]