Talk:Briarpatch

Magazines Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

POV problems

Article is written with biased language and weasel words. Agent 86 21:08, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What?

"Briarpath magazine" !!!! ????

"Briarpatch is Saskatchewan's independent alternative news magazine committed..." !!!! ????

Those two quotations appear to be in conflict. Are they both true?

< http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Briarpatch&oldid=64350979 >.

I, only, got that looking f/ a definition. Does anyone have a definition?

I've found none, @ anything:

< http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/briarpatch >;

< http://m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?briarpatch >;

< http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/briar_patch >;

< http://m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?briar+patch >;

Briar_Patch.

< http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/brier_patch >;

< http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/brierpatch >;

< http://m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?brier+patch >;

< http://m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?brierpatch >.

Hopiakuta 13:50, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is, sort-of, a definition, though not quite:

brier.

Hopiakuta 13:50, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is in the spelling. As hinted at from the above dictionary links, briar is a variant on brier. If one keeps going with online dictionaries one will eventually find something like this:

< http://www.thefreedictionary.com/brier+patch >; which is hinted at by the definition found when you click on the link to "brier" above. This is confirmed, as well, in the Wikipedia listing for Uncle Remus.

Claudew 15:25, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to propose a disambiguation effort for the term "briarpatch" built on three or four parts:

1) the literal definition of the word briarpatch using one of the dictionary defintions that refers to a thorny bramble or hedge of thorns, etc. and that mentions the spelling variations (e.g. briarpatch, brier patch, briar patch, brier patch).

2) Briarpatch (magazine) to include the current page's content.

3) Briarpatch (community) to add a history of the Briarpatch society/network that originated in San Francisco in the 1970s (see < http://www.briarpatch.net >).

4) Briarpatch (Uncle Remus) where the briarpatch plays an important role as a setting for some of the Uncle Remus tales and where it is explained that the word has entered modern parlance with a special meaning.

I'm willing to add the Briarpatch (community) page, but I'm a new contributor and haven't quite mastered the styles for disambiguation. If someone could set it up for me, I could learn from the underlying code and then I could add the history content. Or just point me to the section within the disambiguation documentation that is what I should follow (I find the documentation somewhat challenging and could sure use some tips. Thanks in advance for any help.)

Is this the appropriate place to place this query? Anybody willing to help me?

--Claudew (talk) 16:02, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adding Cleanup Tag

This article is about two thirds POV, unencyclopedic, and just plain patent nonsense. Wind-powered servers? Hauling stuff around on zero-emission SUVs? Suits? Eh? Time for a cleanup. --Hiddekel 22:17, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the article refers to Sport Utility Trailer (ie. pulled behind a bicycle), not an SUV, and I assume the wind-power reference means that they or their service provider pays a premium for wind-power-generated electricity. I disagree that it is patent nonsense. Hopefully though, someone with more information than either of us can work on this article. If it is less encyclopedic than other similar articles on Canadian political magazines like Peace Magazine, Straight Goods or This Magazine, a possible solution is to remove/rewrite the POV material? Any takers? --Delzen 17:46, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can confirm that the Sports Utility Trailer, as in behind a bicycle, is used by the Briarpatch editor and I suspect you are correct regarding how wind-powered electricity works. I have lived in the province the magazine is published and there is a premium you can pay for electricity that supposedly goes toward supporting/using alternative energy sources, mostly if not entirely wind. Admittedly it is a gimmick as the power grid does not separate power sources, but it is the government's gimmick not merely the magazine, and the magazine can be understood to be doing its best to support alternative energy.

Fair use rationale for Image:Briarpatch Cover.jpeg

Image:Briarpatch Cover.jpeg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:42, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Briarpatch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131111175845/http://briarpatchmagazine.com/deeper-roots to http://briarpatchmagazine.com/deeper-roots

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]