Talk:Cueshé

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Tambayan Philippines Low‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Vandalism and request for deletion for this article

I've noticed a lot of irrelevant edits for this article and I think it's really inappropriate. I can understand why many hate Cueshe but this, I just can't understand why many would just put in irrelevant information to this article just to show their criticism. If they really hate the band, then why won't they just forget about spitting their insults and ignore the band? Why won't they just leave them alone instead of "attacking" them by using obscene information? It is like taking revenge on someone although that someone did nothing to them.

Music is music and everyone has to make a living. Criticizing the work of Cueshe is just playing unfair and telling them it's undeserving for them to step in the music scene. And finally wikipedia is a place to get information, not putting in our personal opinions. People visit this site to gather information. Why can't critics just go to forum sites instead of wikipedia to dicuss about their opinions of this band?

If vandals persist to vandalize this article, I might request for deletion of this article. Ralph bonifacio (talk) 11:52, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Real Score

Check the ratio of criticisms and vandalisms, because they're REALLY unbalanced. I mean, there are so many vandalisms compared to the real editors. JUST DELETE THE ARTICLE, because nobody would get information from such crap.
--- unbiased online kid

Major Edits done

I finally removed some of the irrelevant stuff about Cueshe and edited it to sound a bit more formal. I also added an info box to better organize the info. I will advise, though, that this article is for informational purposes and is not the place for personal opinions about the band. Pls. stop vandalizing this page or I may have to ask an admin to lock this article, banning newbies and unregistered users from editing it.
--- interrelate

I removed this sentence from the article:

Their debut single Stay a blatant rip-off of one of the songs of Silverchair, an Australian band.

As well as this:

Rumour has it that fame from their hit album "Half Empty, Half Full" has made Cueshe arrogant (which is very evident). The band claims however, that they're just having fun and that there is nothing to worry about. They were later caught up in an issue about an interview with TV Patrol World where they were called a bunch of second rate music pirates with no talent and no knowledge about music except how to steal it. Their single Stay is purported to be a rip-off because of its similarity to particular Simple Plan and Silverchair songs.

Source these, or they don't belong in the article.

--- goatasaur 01:58, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pop-alternative?

Isn't pop-alternative an oxymoron? The whole reason for alternative music was to break away from pop. These guys are a pop-rock band plain and simple. From their songs, to the way they promote themselves.

awwwww come on

tssss... now by removing so many changes you're adding bias to the article. isn't wikipedia supposed to be neutral? sheesh. rebalance it. you have to return some stuff on their controversies coz after all every band has/had their own share of ups and downs. will you deny cueshe an unbiased article? sheesh. hmmmpppph.

well anyway, good luck, whoever is editing it. the vandals will remain unless you lock the article. maybe you should.

Lead

This article is missing its lead. - Roy Boy ⁸⁰⁰ 21:49, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed it. - Roy Boy ⁸⁰⁰ 21:51, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hilarious

"Long before Cueshé came into the limelight were years of struggle and hard work. Like the time back in their hometown of Cebu when they had to compromise their music for gigs. Or the trying times when Jay met an accident. To make ends meet, Mike sold cigarettes, Fritz drove a passenger jeepney with Jovan as his conductor. Or the moment they left Cebu and set foot in Manila, living together in a small apartment living on canned goods and noodles. Add the skeptics and detractors who called them a "one hit wonder, a "phony" and mere sell-out. Jay, the fat guy, is probably the most criticized member because he only sings about two lines in most of their songs."

What is this? Vandalism as the article's lead? Hahaha! I won't fix it, though, it's too funny. Moonwalkerwiz 00:39, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

bading cueshe

Rewritten

I've actually rewritten a bit of the page. It looks so unprofessinal and really needs to be rewritten. I have done something but whoever wants to contend with my editing, feel free to leave your comment on this talk page or to my user talk page to ameliorate more on this one. Thanks. BritandBeyonce 12:54, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cueshé. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080205111452/http://www.filipinomusica.com/cueshe.html to http://www.filipinomusica.com/cueshe.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:47, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]