This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject The Kinks, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.The KinksWikipedia:WikiProject The KinksTemplate:WikiProject The KinksThe Kinks articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Library of Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Library of Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Library of CongressWikipedia:WikiProject Library of CongressTemplate:WikiProject Library of CongressLibrary of Congress articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
The following statement may be original reasearch, but keyboard parts are audible on the original version. Has anyobody got a source as that mentions the player? The given source doesn't mention this information, and I've been having trouble finding such a source, and I know that, unless a source can be found mentioning this information, it stays out. I guess it's entirely possible that no reliable sources exist. This may be another example of original research, but I'd say it's likely that, being the bandleader and primary keyboardist for the Funk Brothers at the time, it was Earl Van Dyke who played keys on on the original version. Because the musicians were all uncredited prior to 1971, it's often difficult to find out with certainty about who played what (whether it's all the instruments or just some of the instruments) on the pre-1971 Motown recordings. Anybody got a source for the keyboard parts?--2601:153:901:60C0:E934:2013:9A24:2311 (talk) 03:41, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The information that the Jagger-Bowie cover version had additional lyrics (which seems to be a relevant fact to me) was deleted from this article while I personally was informed that I should "be prepared to cite a reliable source". Actually, I do not know what kind of "reliable source" is needed here. Everybody can listen to both recordings, and there can be no doubt about the difference in the lyrics. Would links to the lyrics on various lyrics pages on the internet be a "reliable source"? -- Sebastian Panwitz (talk) 19:25, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Reliable sources are defined here. You should provide a source to establish that the added lyrics have some degree of significance, but also because we should not be adding information to Wikipedia based solely on our own observations; that is the definition of original research. Cheers. DonIago (talk) 21:10, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]