Talk:Danish modern

Denmark High‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Industrial design Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Industrial design, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Industrial design on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Industrial designWikipedia:WikiProject Industrial designTemplate:WikiProject Industrial designIndustrial design articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Justification: don't speedy delete

Danish modern is a style of furniture, not a brand. No one particular company is represented, so it does not qualify for A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. The style was especially popular in the 1950s and 1960s, and is notable as a interior design movement during that time period. I'm working on bringing the article up to Wikipedia standard. kevyn (talk) 06:21, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also please note that a Google search for "Danish modern" yields 300,000+ results. kevyn (talk) 06:47, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why would anyone want to delete this? It could use some pictures and the name of other designers. DCDuring (talk) 23:54, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal to merge with Danish design

It seems to me that the article deserves to be expanded in its own right as it is above all concerned with furniture from the 1950s and 1960s. Danish design has a much wider scope and covers a more extensive period, right up to the present day. - Ipigott (talk) 09:46, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And so you did. Very good work. --Thorseth (talk) 19:42, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I think I've just about finished adding what I intended. All we need now are illustrations for some of the designers. All contributions welcome. - Ipigott (talk) 11:32, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]