Talk:Digital holographic microscopy

Physics Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

History - Misleading/uncited content

The "History" section contains mis-leading and uncited content; notably

At the time, the market driving digital image sensors was primarily low-resolution video, and so those sensors provided only PAL, NTSC, or SECAM resolution. This suddenly changed at the beginning of the 21st century with the introduction of digital still image cameras, which drove demand for inexpensive high-pixel-count sensors.

This doesn't have much bearing on digital holography since the resulting still image sensors were covered with structures such as micro-lens arrays for (irrelevant to this application) low-light sensitivity, Bayer filters (for single-chip colour), etc. all of which destroyed quality imaging with coherent light. From my personal experience at the time, I'd say the growth in digital holography was enabled by that in industrial imaging and machine vision (that's where we looked for suppliers), which was itself enabled by improvements in computing in particular the PCI bus as a cross-platform way to efficiently get images into the computer in the first place. Consumer-grade sensor chips may have been for camcorders, but there was no shortage of higher-spec kit intended for astronomy. --84.51.139.208 (talk) 00:11, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Similarly, "still lacked the required pixel count and density for digital holography to be anything more than a curiosity." looks a bit subjective. --Louis Knee (talk) 21:47, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I notice the article on the Owen digital holocamera (1999) has screenshots reporting pixel counts of 512x512 or 486x786, about CCIR, and IIRC early videos from the Katz camera deployments (2007?) were 800x800. Implied claim that there's a required pixel count and density will need referencing. --Louis Knee (talk) 22:50, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, as microscopy is just one application of digital holography I think it would make more sense to move the history from here to that article. --Louis Knee (talk) 20:27, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Listing vendors

Wikipedia is not a source for vendors. Just like the yellow pages don't have biographies of the people listed, the encyclopedia doesn't contain lists of vendors. This information can be found in other ways, but wikipedia articles are not for advertising. They're encyclopedia articles.

--KMLP (talk) 05:35, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Graphics

It is a bit unclear in the drawing what happens with the reference beam regarding the reconstruction. It almost seems as if the spherical wave of the reference magically turns into a collimated beam until it reaches the detector. - This should be clarified ... BoP (talk) 14:33, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Digital holographic microscopy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140413141602/http://4-deep.com/submersible-microscope/ to http://4-deep.com/submersible-microscope/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:44, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]