Talk:Gravel

Mining Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Geology Mid‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Gravel is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of samples of different types of gravel, with a 10 cm ruler for scale be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Cobble

Somebody should make a Cobble article that isn't a disambig. Someone who knows about it at all. --Kevin ^(TALK)_(MUSIC) 03:52, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gravel size

Gravel in US is limited by #4 sieve which is 4.75 mm, not 2 mm, as in probably Great Britain? See Geotechnical and Foundation Engineering —Preceding unsigned comment added by Veriti (talk • contribs) 21:50, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like sediments and soils use different scales, as far as I can tell. It's not obvious to me that this is a transatlantic problem, but they certainly turn up often enough. Mikenorton (talk) 22:26, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Soil classification is made by the International ISO 14688-1:2002 standard. This standard is also approved as European standard EN 14688-1:2002. So why is the article using obsolete references? Read https://www.iso.org/standard/25260.html Välfärd - att färdas väl (talk) 07:16, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blue metal

Crushed rock used for building roads is often called "blue metal" in Australia. Its not metal, is it basalt ? It is a dark bluish-grey colour.Eregli bob (talk) 08:15, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Etymology

I cannot find a source that agrees with the Breton etymology. The sources provided give the Old French etymology of "gravele" or "gravelle". The Collins dictionary mentions a possible Celtic root, but does not concretely name a source word or language. Wiktionary cites the proto-Celtic *grāwā as the ultimate origin, but I assume this is not a good citation to use. If no citation for the Breton etymology can be found, I recommend that it be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.171.61.32 (talk) 20:41, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I concur. The cognate "grève" in French ultimately derives from the proto-Latin *grava, which means "sand." Thus there's nothing attested about Breton or components of riverbanks. I'm revising. JonathanE1980 (talk) 17:10, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pea gravel

What is called 'Pea gravel' on this page is called 'pea shingle' in the UK. Also the shingle disambiguation page does not acknowledge this use.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gravel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130608071757/http://www.eoearth.org/article/Abiotic_factor?topic=49461 to http://www.eoearth.org/article/Abiotic_factor?topic=49461

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:04, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

U.S.-centric on production and uses

Because I can't find statistics for any other nation. Surely the U.S. is not the only nation that collects statistics on gravel use? But Google Scholar doesn't dredge up (heh) anything for gravel except from the U.S. Geological Survey, which has only U.S. figures. If any editor can find reliable sources for other nations, please add to the "Production and uses" section. --Kent G. Budge (talk) 18:22, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah; found some material. It's a different set of USGS reports. WIll add as I have opportunity. --Kent G. Budge (talk) 18:24, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gravel

How is gravel form 2405:201:E033:9A89:2479:3D3:43BC:D968 (talk) 14:40, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]