Talk:Hapag-Lloyd Flight 3378

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hapag-Lloyd Flight 3378 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Aviation: Accidents

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the Aviation accident project.

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Vienna Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Vienna, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Vienna on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ViennaWikipedia:WikiProject ViennaTemplate:WikiProject ViennaVienna
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Austria Low‑importance

	Austria portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Austria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles about Austria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AustriaWikipedia:WikiProject AustriaTemplate:WikiProject AustriaAustria
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

How much kerosene?

that there was only 1.3 t of kerosene left in the tanks

How much? Tempshill 22:01, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

t is the symbol for a teaspoon, which is about 5 mL. So they had 6.5 mL of kerosene. 24.170.177.163 06:13, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

lol, t is actually the symbol for tonne Dan100 (Talk) 21:07, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ton or tonne? Nippoo 23:29, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Er, tonne, like I said. Dan100 (Talk) 15:45, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment Comments

references. map of the route would be good. lead section, plus other sections. And is there a reason this is important? For example, did the incident lead to legislation or regulation involving fueling or inspection of aircraft? So what? --Auntieruth55 (talk) 01:33, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Google-Translate of official report in German language

Is it still relevant? Layzeeboi: German diskussion: English-WP version of incident history now more complete than this one Zopp (talk) 19:54, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please clarify: Is what still relevant? The article itself? In which case, is your comment relevant? Are you suggesting a nomination for deletion? Layzeeboi (talk) 07:53, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Time

Article suddenly switches from CEDT times to UTC "within the story"... ;-} --Arilou (talk) 13:10, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]