Talk:Novo (disambiguation)

Requested move 19 Octember 2024

It has been proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved.

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

Novo (disambiguation) → Novo
Novo → Novo (film).

As I can see the page was moved in 2009 without preliminary discussion https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Novo_(disambiguation)&diff=prev&oldid=280204729|moved in 2009 and Novo, the movie, is not so important. See also Special:WhatLinksHere/Novo MrKeefeJohn (talk) 08:34, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support, the film is not the primary topic. JIP | Talk 10:37, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination and JIP. There are 11 entries listed upon the Novo (disambiguation) page, with no indication that the film's standing in cinematic history is such that it dwarfs the combined notability of the remaining ten entries. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 16:04, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support no clear primary topic per views[[1]]. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:32, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If we look at range=all-time for that, and the same for people with the surname, there's 13 views/day for the base name (film) and 158 views/day for Nacho Novo. That's no indication of primary topic by usage whatsoever, really. I don't see a long-term significance argument, either. (Support) In the future, please try the expedited WP:RM/TR process for such reversals of dubious changes. --Joy (talk) 09:15, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. The film isn't the primary topic: see Massviews [2]. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:48, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]