Talk:Pacific FC

Football: American & Canadian Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American and Canadian soccer task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Canada: British Columbia / Sport Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian sport.

Shitty refs for the short name

Two sports writers using initials to support "PFC" are you serious? Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:23, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Is the "Ferryside Derby" even real?

Does it really make sense to call a fixture a main rivalry and when the clubs have only met one time? I feel like this is a similar situation to a controversy on the Vancouver Whitecaps FC talk page that occurred a couple years ago where it was decided that Vancouver Whitecaps FC did not really share a remarkable rivalry with FC Edmonton as they did not compete in the same league, play each other with enough frequency, or have enough significant history. Nelson Roy (talk) 20:33, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Correction: the FC Edmonton vs Vancouver Whitecaps FC rivalry discussion was on this page: Template talk:Vancouver Whitecaps FC. Not the Vancouver Whitecaps FC talk page. Nelson Roy (talk) 21:06, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that "rivalry" is a bit of a stretch after just 1 match. It was a significant match and does deserve a place in the history section but no more. BLAIXX 01:06, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is not even a derby. It is not supported by the supporters group. It cannot be supported by the league as they play in different leagues. I can't see Canada Soccer supporting it. The only thing that can be said about the one time they have met is that the victory—the second Vancouver had suffered to a CSL side—resulted in the (long overdue) removal of their head coach. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:07, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly. In my opinion the rivalry section should include a rivalry with Cavalry FC (which I already made a section about and am currently working on its own page), and eventually the Vancouver expansion team (that will likely play in Surrey). I was recently discussing Pacific FC's rivalries on a reddit community and many fans seem to think Vancouver Whitecaps FC is their main rival because they don't want to play "third wheel" in the Al Classico, however, I would argue that the Cavalry - Pacific fixture is much more competitive and fiery, especially after the 2021 season. Definitely beats watching Cavalry massacre FC Edmonton every 3 weeks or so. Nelson Roy (talk) 16:53, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]