Talk:Parents Action League

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Parents Action League article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 30 days

This article was nominated for deletion on 9 September 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Parents Action League. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Parents Action League at the Reference desk.

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Minnesota Low‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

PAL's damaging propaganda about the gay community

I have restored the six words, directly quoted by an SPLC employee and reported in a reliable,secondary source. These words explain why PAL was designated an anti-gay hate group.

"The Southern Poverty Law Center designated Parents Action League as an anti-gay hate group for "damaging propaganda about the gay community"".

There is no consensus to remove this vital, contextual information. The argument that it is generic, and therefore does not apply, does not hold water.

The direct quote from the Star Tribune article is:

The center's Heidi Beirich said the Parents Action League was included on their hate list for "damaging propaganda about the gay community," including calling gays and lesbians "promiscuous, dysfunctional, unhealthy.

Star Tribune

Notice the absence of equivocation. Also notice the absence of the word 'generic'. – MrX 13:01, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New PAL activity

This article talks about PAL information being presented... even as it refers to the group as dormant (which would be in keeping with the disappearance of its website.) I've not taken to the time to evaluate this potential source as an RS, but if anyone wants to run with it, there you go. --Nat Gertler (talk) 19:09, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How nice to see that our old PAL Barb is up to some new anti-LGBT activism. It may warrant a brief mention.- Mr X 🖋 19:41, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New tags

Neither of the new tags (Notability, neutrality) belong there. The groups notability is shown by coverage in such national outlets as Rolling Stone and Mother Jones. The neutrality tag is a notice that there is a discussion about neutrality active on the Talk page, which is clearly not the case. I'm avoiding editing articles at this time, but I encourage other to confirm what I say and remove those tags. --Nat Gertler (talk) 21:51, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I took down both of the tags. There's no reason for keeping them up due to what you have mentioned. Alexius08 (talk) 10:53, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]