Talk:Theatre of Canada

Article issues

There is far too much unsourced material, including unsourced embedded lists, sections, subsections, paragraphs, as well as dangling sentences (sentences after a source). There very well could be synthesis.

The "External links" section was bloated so I moved some here for possible discussion.

• The Canadian Theatre Record
• L.W. Conolly Theatre Archives at University of Guelph, Archival and Special Collections, which holds more than 150 archival collections related to Canadian theatre
• SIBMAS: International Directory of Performing Arts Collections and Institutions
• The Canadian Adaptations of Shakespeare Project -- Otr500 (talk)

Policies and guidelines

There were 8 links which is too many. Three seems to be an acceptable number and of course, everyone has their favorite to try to add for a forth.

The problem is that none is needed for article promotion.

• ELpoints #3) states: Links in the "External links" section should be kept to a minimum. A lack of external links or a small number of external links is not a reason to add external links.
• LINKFARM states: There is nothing wrong with adding one or more useful content-relevant links to the external links section of an article; however, excessive lists can dwarf articles and detract from the purpose of Wikipedia. On articles about topics with many fansites, for example, including a link to one major fansite may be appropriate.
• ELMIN: Minimize the number of links. --
• ELCITE: Not applicable Do not use {{cite web}} or other citation templates in the External links section. Citation templates are permitted in the Further reading section.

External links This page in a nutshell: External links in an article can be helpful to the reader, but they should be kept minimal, meritable, and directly relevant to the article. With rare exceptions, external links should not be used in the body of an article.

Second paragraph, acceptable external links include those that contain further research that is accurate and on-topic, information that could not be added to the article for reasons such as copyright or amount of detail, or other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article for reasons unrelated to its accuracy.

silence as consensus is not a valid reason for excessive links.

• • Please note:
• WP:ELBURDEN: Disputed links should be excluded by default unless and until there is a consensus to include them. -- Otr500 (talk)

Sources

There are some issues with the references:

The Katherine Foster Grajewski reference (currently #1) returned 404 dead link.

"tarragontheatre.com" (current #4) does not supply a link to provide text-source integrity.

Some references do not have a page number -- Otr500 (talk) 13:43, 2 December 2024 (UTC)