User:Alan Liefting/On The Easy Of Adding References Or Otherwise
Appearance
This is a resource page for referencing issues.
Methods
[edit]- ref name and then full ref as footnote
- makes it hard to split page.
Issues
[edit]- ease of adding to articles
- reliable sources of bibliographical metadata
- simplfying the wikitext. (wadin thought it can be daunting)
- avoiding vandalism
- avoiding good faith edits that leave damaged code
- ensuring sufficient bibliographical data is added
- giving a consistent "feel" of "look" to WP citations
- allowing biblio metadata to be pulled out via CoinS
- does not work if a ref template is used.
- archiving urls
Policies and guidelines
[edit]
Tools
[edit]- Auto filled with a bot
Some ideas
[edit]Can the operation of RefToolbar 2.0 be changed so that the following happens:
- when, for example, the doi number xxxx is entered it will look up {{cite doi/xxxx}} (in this case pulled from Category:Cite doi templates) to fill in the fields. If the doi number does not have a WP template then data is grabbed from external sources.
- If it is a new doi number then a new template is created and added to Category:Cite doi templates.
This system could be set up for ISBN, pmid, etc as well.
hmmmm, is it worthwhile creating out own database???? The stuff is already elesewhere.
- An earlier idea
- Citation bot and expanding citations
Citation bot (talk · contribs) expands out templates such as {{cite doi}}, {{cite pmid}} out to a {{cite}} template as I understand it. There are some reasons why I don't think it should be done:
- The handling of the <ref> tag of the WikiMedia software is not perfect apparently. The cite/core is being talked about over at MediaWiki.
- I have muttered and grumbled to myself about the need for a centralised and consistent method of reference formatting.
- The coding of a page is easier on the eye (if not using wikEd). This is nicer
<ref>{{Cite doi|10.2307.2F1514012}}</ref>
- than this
<ref>{{cite journal| first = Audi| last = Georges|title = The NUBASE Evaluation of Nuclear and Decay Properties| journal = Nuclear Physics A| volume = 729| pages = 3–128| publisher = Atomic Mass Data Center| year = 2003 |doi=10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2003.11.001 | bibcode=2003NuPhA.729....3A| last2 = Bersillon| first2 = O.| last3 = Blachot| first3 = J.| last4 = Wapstra| first4 = A.H.}}</ref>
- Page splitting might be easier
- Vandalism might be easier to control.
- global updates of a references can easily be done
- ensures a consistency in formatting.
I cannot see any reasons for not tanscuding the cite doi, pmid templates directly into a page. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 22:58, 7 March 2012 (UTC)