Jump to content

User talk:78.190.51.205

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


November 2024

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to 2000s in fashion have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: 2000s in fashion was changed by 78.190.51.205 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.918651 on 2024-11-20T06:40:44+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:40, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. WiiUf🐉 08:41, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1 78.190.51.205 (talk) 08:45, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
2 78.190.51.205 (talk) 08:46, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kestrel Web Server (November 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 04:24, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
for things such as software development anything other than primary sources are usually unavailable and reliable sources are very limited, is it possible to make an exception for secondary sources rule since bias isn't concern as things like politics
I removed one unreliable source from stackoverflow, not sure if github that belongs to the microsoft's own repos are considered unreliable 78.190.51.205 (talk) 13:54, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, 78.190.51.205! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 04:24, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kestrel Web Server (November 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 14:30, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
secondary sources are not available then what to do 78.190.51.205 (talk) 14:50, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Kestrel Web Server has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kestrel Web Server. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:37, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]